 Hei! Rwy'n goesiwch ychydig i hefyd o wybodaeth gael'i broseson, a'r ysgrifennu'r ffordd. Felly mae'n wneud o fudwch cyntredwyd. A wnaethwch i am ddiwethaf o'r arferfyniadau. donei'r gwirionedd y wneud bod ymgyrchu diwethaf yn gweithfael arloedd. Felly dydych chi'n ddweud o'r ffordd yn ei bach arall erdoedd yn ni gwrsio'r ffordd gael'n yr ardal. Felly yma wedi cael ei wneud o gwaith am wneud o ffordd ei wneud yw'n ei gweithfael. Oddydd yw erioed wlad am gyrfa ymdill sydd ymgyrchu ar y modd ddigon yma ar y maen nhw'n ddiogel i'r llwyr yma nesaf a'r rysgwyr yn unig mewn gwirionedd i'r llwyr. Rwy'n ddweud 3 ei ddweud ar ac nid oedd oedd ei ddweud i'r hwn ar hynny. o'r ysgol yw'r audience. Felly, mae'n ryebwyd i'r sgol gyntaf, yw'r sgol gyntaf, a'r sgol gyntaf o'r sgol gyda'r sgol a'r ysgol yma. Felly, yna'n rhesaith bod y sgol yma. Rwy'n ei bod y Llywodraeth Llywodraeth i'r meddwl cynferol yn Cephol Stryd o London. Mae'n meddwl mewn postgradredigol ac yw'n mynd i'r ysgol ymwrdd o'r hefyd. Ysgol yma wedi'r Sgol ymweld 15 yma, Amser o'i ddweud ymliech gylai ammell yn anhygoelfa i ddedigol. Rwy'n rhaid i ddweud, mae gennym hwnnw i'n godi, dda pobl ar bethau rhaid i gyd, mae'n heddiw i'n teimlad ar y bwyd, mae erioed wedi symud o bobl yn oeddennig yn through os i'r rhaid i gyrsionedd yn ddweud bod mae'n siaradau i'r ddweud yr oeddodol ddaraf iawn. Felly mae'r hoffi rhaid i'r cyflwyster, mae'n rhaid i'r hoffi'r ysgrif graspod mae'n cael ei gyrraedd o'n pethau wasbainol, acresol, ac rhaid i gyrraedd y memesol sydd ymlaen i'r amserwr, ac mae'n gyrraedd mewn erioed yn gweithio llwydo. A wnaeth nefyd wedi'i lleiddon, mae wedyn cymdeithasio'r meddwl yn ei colleithau ac mae'n bwysig o'r meddwl yn gwybonnig, yw gwnaeth yma â thfawr. Mae'n dweud i gwybod ar i nifer o gyd 때문에, ac mae'n dynnu o'r mynd i fathiau yn credu gwybod yn unig hynny oherwydd. yma'r bronch ac roeddwn i gydag yn fod yn ymwyaf ac wedi atweud yn gwybod, mewn amgylchedd. Rwy'n adrodd yn y byw, mae'r awdurdod yma yn dod o'n gweithio ar gyfer gyda'r styleddau a'r gyfan, a'r styleddau yn ei wneud o amser oes o'r ffordd ar gyfer gweithio ar gyfer gweithio, ond mae'r ffordd yn ei wneud. Rydym yn ei wneud o'r wneud o'r ffordd yn y gweithio ar gyfer gweithio that do a history and health module but our main users and researchers are not students so we are trying to kind of work with them but knowing that they're not really going to come and use the archives in the time they are studying at the school. So, when we do events we will get students come to them but they're interested in their personal point of view actually it help their research. We used to hold gyms from the collections which is a couple of examples here. Mae wedi cael ei weld barn i'w menyddych ein bod ychwan twfawr a'i gynllunio'n ddau, mae dyma'n gwybod a chyda'r ymddangos, yn ymddangos a'r cyntaf. Mae erbyn i chi i ddefnyddio ymddangos, ond y cwmysgol yn y cyflwytoedd mewn cyffredin heritage rei'n mynd arlau ac yn ysgrffwyd Verse. Fynd i'ch gadw'n gweithio'n g萵 addysg, yn y bydraeth ddau, yn gweithio'n gweithio dros yn effaith. Fynd i mwy fryd ar gyfer ei gyn nhw, Cymru yma i wych yn ymdegwyd, a fyddwch yn mynd i ddim yn y ddweud â gweithio'r sesio, nid oes wedi bod yn ymdegwydau i'r gyda gyda gen i, ond nid ydych chi'n ddim yn ymdegwyd a'u ddweud yn ymdegwyd. Roeddwn i'n rhan o'r ddweud, ac mae hyn yn bwysig wedi'u mynd i ddim yn cyffredinol ac yn meddwl cyflwyno'r cyffredinol, yna i ddweud ymdegwyd â'r cyfwydig, ac rwy'n dweud y cyfrexio cyfaluedol i fod yn si hold mlynedd, hiero Paedwyr, ac rwy'n dweud bod wrth fleifiau allan yr awd, ac rwy'n dweud ond, mynd i'n teimlo i gael y pwyllteidau, rwy'n bach ymweld, rwy'n gwneud gyda swydd ac mae'n gael ar sut yn gweithio. Mae'n gwneud hynny yn wandach o'r wych, wrth gwrs, ond nifer ysgblion ar y stag. Gwych yn weith bobl clywed i'r cyfleoedd, o wneud ychydig o'r cyfael o'r material? Rwy'n iawn i chi'n cael ei wneud datblygu gyda'r bobl ychydigiaeth sydd wedi gwneud i'r patriot iddiwn. Mae'n gwneud i'n wneud i'r patriot yn private sydd ganddiwch yn gyhoedd yma, felly gynethm eich hoffi ar gyfer mae'r bobl cynnigol eu cyfliad yn gyd-dug, i'n meddwl ar gyfer am y gost ar gyfer yr oedd cysylltwn yn gweithio lawer. Mae'n meddwl i nesaf, mae'n ffug i'r patriot wedi weithio hidell oherwydd alone, we're promoting the archives again wasn't much kind of come back from that. I feel that we have been trying to be quite innovative in the past as well in other ways. So there's two pictures here from a event called Archives Alive. So I worked with two actors and we created a script based around three women scientists. These were women that again women's history. There's not that many of you like I was going to say important, not important, Ond rwywer, dypa hwnnw yn siwr ysgrifennu'r hysgrunio ar y hwnnw wedi'i gweld yn wasbyddien. Mae'r ddrwf yn cael ei gwir, rydych chi'n bwysig iddo yn yn ymddangos rwyf yn lei'r hanes ylleydd o'r brifysgol ond ond ond, ond ond yn cael ei gweithio. Mae'r mwynhau ysgrifennu yn dweud yn meddwlenni, ac yn ddiogel i'n meddwl ifanc addur yn meddwl o'i mewn byw o'r hoffidol. Byddwn i'n diogel i'nol sy'n bynnag bod yn cael ei gweithio. Felly, rydw i'n ffordd i'r rhan o ddim yn ddod yn cymdeithasol. Mae gen i'n meddwl i'r pethau, ond rydw i'n meddwl i'r podcasu, i'n ddydd iawn dod i'r pethau sy'n ddod. Rhaid o'r ffawr arllwch yn ymddangosol ffâffau ar yr argynfiad. Felly, ydym ei wneud cyfathor o'r grwyth o'r bach. Felly, mae'n cymdeithasol yma ar y cwrdd â gweithfawr â'r ffwrdd. Mae'n ymddangosol rhaid o'r mynd ddod yn llawer ei cychwyn i'r ysbytyd yn 2014 – chi'n gweld y flynydd ynmiadio'n ystafell yn y gwirloedd ydyn nhw... ..yn y Llyfrgell Llyfrgell ac'r Llyfrgell Yngyrch Llyfrgell nawr yn unedio'n gwirloedd ysbytyd. Felly dyna'r ffordd blaenwyr, ac mae gennym iawn i'r pandyn nhw'n ffordd liddorol... ..y weithi nhw'n ffordd caeth 000 a'r ffordd llyn sydd i gynnyddwyr ydym ni'n gwybod... Felly rydych am ymdegyn nhw, ym mwyaf'r ysbytydd... I'm going to move on to talk about the three projects that we've worked on in the last year. This is Sir Arnold Ross. His collection is the largest that we hold. It has over 20,000 items. Obviously, normal staff correspondence, photographs reports. He's obviously very important in terms of malaria because he was the discoverer of the mosquito transmission of malaria. He was the first Britain to win the Nobel Prize for Medicine. He's very close to my heart because I actually cataloged his papers. We had a welcome trust grant in 2003, so I've read all but most of his papers, so he is dear to my heart. What's interesting about him is, although he made this amazing discovery, he was also a prominent figure in history. In terms of life and society, he was friends with Roger Kippler in HD Wells because he was a poet and a writer and an artist, but also new politicians and so forth. His collection is very rich in scientific material but also other material. What's been nice in the project I'm going to talk about is promoting his discovery in more depth. The first project is, this is Ailey Robinson, the lady with ginger hair, and she is a PhD student. She actually approached us last year. She'd received a public engagement grant from the school and really wanted to work with us and a group of school children about diagnostics and using microscopes. It was a project with local school children to look at using microscopes for diagnostics. Part of the project was to use a full microscope. Her aim was to promote and use these. It's a paper microscope which only costs $1 to produce. It really encourages people to use microscopes and look at the microscopic word or the microcosmos, which was a new term to me when I got involved. She worked the session, which she ran three at the school in the original labs, as you'll see, was to create this origami microscope and they actually looked at the malaria-infected brain sections. Also, they, as you can see, they can be connected to smartphones, so she really felt that that would connect with the teenagers. She really wanted to have a historical element to the project as well, which is where we got involved, and really show how researchers in the past would use microscopes, and the fact that major discoveries such as the mosquito transmission of malaria had only been made possible with the use of microscopes. What I quite like is the fact that Ross also designed his own diagnostic microscope, because the ones that we have, and you can see here, that was too large to travel around with, so there's really nice parallel that they're looking at portable microscopes to do diagnosis in the field, and that's what Sir Ronald Ross did. There's some great pictures here of the scholars really looking at our material from the archives. What was also really important is that staff got to look at the archives, and these are stuff that we don't necessarily come into contact with through other areas that we work in. These events are really good at building our profile, getting more staff engaged with the archives, and it's proved true recently, because we had an accession from one of these ladies Clare Rogers, which included blood slides from 1914. They're moving labs, and we're like, oh, we've just found this material. It would be nice if they'd thought of us before, but I really feel like we're building momentum with this, so it was nice that they got involved with this. Working with PhD students, and this is something I can all come back to, but Ailey, the student, wrote in a blog post. She said, running sessions like these can sometimes seem like a lot of arguably unnecessary work, but why the benefit of the students by providing means to which to explore the microscopic world and generate a discussion and interest on the topic of disease diagnosis. They also benefit the scientists who led the sessions. Public engagement projects like these allow myself and colleagues to hone our ability to explain scientific concepts without jargon and overcomplication. I found that learning to deliver presentations that can hold the attention of school children has served me extremely well as an academic presenting to my peers. I think there's lots of parallels with archivists. I think, again, themes in the conference have come up about not using jargon and trying to promote different audiences, so I thought that was quite interesting that, as a PhD student, trying to do similar things in public engagement that archivists do, that they kind of face some of the same issues. I'm now going to move on to talk about an event for our internal audience. This is History in the Making, where Slides explored and explained. We ran the session last week as part of Explore Your Archives, and that was the second time we'd run the session. This is a box of Ross blood slides, which we travelled with and obviously used diagnosis. In 2015, students from the History and Health module, as I said, there's about 14 of them a year, suggested that we put Ross' slides, a collection of malaria slides under the microscope. We're a little bit nervous about this, because obviously with the preservation versus access argument, we were quite unsure, but because this suggestion had come from a student and they were really, really keen on this, we thought, right, we'll choose one and we'll actually do it. It was a bit out of our comfort zone. These are the photographs that were taken of the blood slides. We got colleagues, including Ailee from the last project, and staff in the Public Health Malaria Research Reference Laboratory, and they examined these slides under the microscope, decided that they were still viable and presented some really exciting results. They were really excited about the staining techniques. They used something called a genton violet, which has changed considerably since the 19th century, but you can see, and this is where it proves my point, the oocysts and the gamocytes. This is where my medical knowledge ends. We're seeing. These were photographed by the laboratory and we had these on show at the event that we ran. What was really lovely was that the staff were so excited about the results, but they were actually more excited about the staining methods than the actual oocysts and gamocytes, the malaria stages. I think, again, there were similarities with the archives profession. I know maybe book conservators get excited about the binding of books and maybe some of us get excited about the arrangement of a collection. I think it was interesting to see. I'd assumed that they'd be excited about the content rather than the methods, so I thought that was a really interesting part of this project. This is the event. We had staff and students. I think we had roughly about 80 people come during a lunchtime session to come and look at the material that we'd got out. We had our academic colleagues, scientific colleagues, so you can see showing people the actual bloodslides and talking about them while myself and my colleagues were talking about the rare books and the archives. We gave a really nice rounded event in terms of there were people that could talk about the scientific discovery, and then there was us that could talk more about Ross and his life and so forth. Another kind of first was this was a visiting academic who suddenly said, I could make that microscope work, so he got his mobile phone out with the light and just started fiddling around with it. Again, we were slightly unsure about this because we were like people, you don't normally touch the archives, but we got caught up in his enthusiasm. We actually got the microscope working and other staff and students could actually look through the microscope and see some of the slides. Again, it's that preservation versus access kind of argument. We didn't want to stop him because he was so enthusiastic and it's really nice to get that interaction with our users. From this event, we've had really good feedback from the staff members that came. Again, they're really keen to do more outreach, and some of the staff that work in the labs to do this sort of outreach, so they're keen to get involved with more of the historical collections. The final event I'm going to talk about is the Cheltenham Science Festival. I'd like to think as a result of the previous two projects that this is how this came about. The public engagement officer said, would we like to be involved in a session at the Cheltenham Science Festival? I will warn you in a minute the photos aren't quite as good quality as the ones which were taken by a professional photographer. You'll see what I mean in a minute. The title of the session was The Story of the Mosquito. It was going to split into three parts. The idea of the talk was to give an overview of the story of malaria highlighting Ross' importance, but also how scientists are using his methods, the methods he used in his original discovery today. I started off the talk speaking about his discovery and then highlighting it with material from the archives. You can see there's a selection of the material I used there. Then Ailey Robinson, who appears in all of these events, she took over for me and spoke a little bit about Ross and made a really nice link between Ross and someone called Samakam Watson who did a lot of malaria work in the 1950s in our education programme in Malaya. She spoke about her research methods of her current PhD. That was really nice to hear more about her research methods. Finally, Will Stone, who's a PhD student, carried on about new research linking back to Ross' transmission, cycle discovery and how scientists still look at the original transmission of malaria and try and find weak points in it. What I really like about working with the PhD students is that I learn a lot about their current research and just the way that they work was really interesting. It was really nice to have three people responsible for the event as well in terms of, again, coming back to this jargon-free and how you promote your collections and how you talk about your collections, because they were using quite scientific terms that I was like, well, I'm not quite sure about that. Then they were saying to me maybe less is more in terms of when you're talking about Ross because I can talk for England about Ross because I know so much about him. What was also nice about the event is that we got to take the archives out, put it on for people to come and look, so it added another dimension to the event as did a live mosquito dissection, which Eilidair did in front of everyone. Conclusions and benefits. I think really the improved work in relationship with academic colleagues, as I've pointed out, it's been really useful in raising our profile, getting more accessions in, people asking us for advice. You can tell I'm responsible for records management if they come to me for lots of different areas, but it's nice if they're like, oh, well, I saw you at that event, but can I talk to you about my current record? So that's been really, really useful. It's also nice to know, and this has come up in the conference that we're expertise and our knowledge, maybe other people that work in academic settings sometimes, but within professional services, sometimes you have to prove yourself a bit and you're like, I do know what I'm talking about. This is what I do. You're an expert in malaria, but I'm an expert in archives. Improve work and relationship with our public engagement officer, and as I said, I think as the relationship grows, more opportunities will come along to work on different projects, which will be really nice. Increased visibility of the archive service to new and existing audiences. I think sometimes we're really busy and we're getting on, and I've worked there, I set up the archives over the 15 years, and I'm thinking, oh, well, that person's been here 20 years. They must know about the archive service, maybe some people don't know as much as I kind of think they would and assume they would. So I think there's a need to do constant reassessing of what we're doing and how we're doing it. And then supporting the work of our main stakeholder. As was said, we were recently awarded accreditation and we did lots of work on evaluation and supporting the school and who are our main stakeholders. One thing we have done is think about a kind of decision tree about what events we take on. I think in the past we were so excited about someone and said, oh, do you want to do an event? We were like, yeah, of course we'll do it. And then we hadn't looked at resources and time and so now we're a little bit more stricter with ourselves of like, should we be doing this? So that accreditation really helped us in honing that down. I did want to add one note because when I went through this with my colleague back in London, she was just like, that these events have been great but they do take a lot of time and a lot of resources and sometimes it can be quite stressful. So just put that out there, which I know you'll all be aware of but I don't want to look like I'm too positive. It's improved our knowledge of the collection and subject matter and I've really felt that, especially with Cheltenham, I did a lot of research on the actual kind of how we made this discovery which I had known a long time ago but had kind of got lost somewhere. So now I have an academic talk to me about malaria and I feel more confident in saying, I've got this and it just helps sometimes to reconnect with that collection and then finally it's very satisfying and rewarding experience it. It was lovely to go to Cheltenham and get out of the office and it's been lovely to come here and it's lovely to maybe work with different colleagues have different conversations and just sometimes it really reconnects you with your archives and why you do what you do. So I think I will end there because I'm being before the one minute. So yes, so that's the end. So thank you.