 I want to speak about the Middle Bronze Age, but I want to give a deeper insight into the processes of the transition under the early Middle Bronze Age and at the Middle Bronze Age. I have taken some traces of the warlords and the supplements, which can be dating in this period. And I will look on these traces so that I can micro-side. Moravia is the country part of the Czech Republic, which is on the north edge of the Carpathian Basin. So I must say that the situation is in the Middle Bronze Age, or the early Middle Bronze Age, different, as in the, for example, very well-known sites as the Transhausen in the south or Jelshovce in the east. The early Bronze Age is the end of the early Bronze Age, but this is my topic. Now, it's typically with the information burials in the flat cemeteries. After the classic phase of the Amni-Ketzler culture is assumed that we have the termination of the standard information right and the royal rights are disintegrated. And it shows us as the almost complete absence of the burial finds. The latest period of the early Bronze Age is known as the Vieterhof Group. It is the part of the cultural complex of the Magyarovci Vieterhof behind Kirchen. And we can interpret, as well as the most interpret, as the pit burials period, pod burials period. And we should have some disposal of cremation remains, some cremation burials. We know, or rather that we have some graves, some disposal of the bodies in the graves. And we know that as the pit burials, so the pod burials are typically not only for the Vieterhof Group, but for the Amni-Ketzler culture, too. When we look on the data, I count what was possible. We see that the pod burials in the Amni-Ketzler culture are in the similar volumes. As the pod burials, what is different? We can see the high difference in the graves of the other graves. They are the graves of the architecture's information. I have counted only the largest cemeteries and the newest excavations. So it is probably more than 700 graves of the Amni-Ketzler culture in Moravia. And we have only 61 graves of the Vieterhof Group in Moravia in the later period of the LRA Bronze Age. So it is not a big change to the antipicorites as the pit burials and pod burials, but it is disappearing of this information burials. So where we can look in for the answers to this question. We have one site. It is Borke-Ketzler Burl Cemetery, which is on the southern Moravia, the only cemetery of the Vieterhof Group. It is a cemetery which is covered with the woodland area, so it is preserved. It is published. And we can see on this cemetery the first time the direct continuity between the Amni-Ketzler Bronze Age and the Middle Bronze Age. And from the excavated part of the burials, we can take burials from the Bronze Age. So and I must say that the topography of the cemetery is sure that on one side you can see the Vieterhof Burl Cemetery, and on the other side you can see the burials of the Tumor's culture. I have counted after the publication and the graphic documentation the depth of the burials on this cemetery. And we can see that on this cemetery, we have one part of the burials, which are under the old land surface. It is about more than one-half, but only eight of these burials is deeper than 30 centimeters under this old land surface of the ground. The other of these burials are over. So they are in the earth covering all on the old land surface. What is important, too, that not all of these burials, which are known and taken as the Vieterhof, are dated after the finds. This part of this grave is dated only after the position of the grave in the Tumori. So when the Tumul's hole is dated in the Vieterhof, then all the finds, which are known as bronze age, are dated in the Vieterhof. So it is a very high proportion of these graves. So we can look at it as and figure out that for the Vieterhof group burials, it is typical as the high amount of graves over the old land surface as a very high amount of the graves, which are very low deep under the grave surface. And no one of the burials was in the subsoil. It's very important. And we have less burials with the grave goods. The second face of the grave of this cemetery is from the middle bronze age. Here it is a situation a little bit different. We can see that we have here part of the graves, which are under the old land surface. But some of them are already in the subsoil. They are deeper. So another part of these graves, and it is a higher amount in the Vieterhof culture, are over this old land surface. And at most are these graves dated after the finds. For the sure data about the Vieterhof group, we have dated one of the graves, which was possible, but very obvious of these finds of the burials are very bad preserved. So we have dated one which was possible. And we have some dates to the typical grave of the Vieterhof group. So it is for us very important for other interpretations. We have in the neighbour countries one of the sign which can be compared to this burial site, this pit burial cemetery. It is about 128 kilometers south. Here it is preserved by the mountains. Over life is a sediment of the river. And so we have Niora Vankowski dated this site to the middle bronze age as a whole. Other analysis of the British cat dated this nine of the burials to the early Bronze Age. It is precisely a middle, then again Bronze Age one. And we can under these graves, under these burials, to which are, it is in this Tumuli 164, which are in the cover of the Tumuli or on the old land surface. The other of the graves are under the old land surface and the most of them are really deep. So I would show here that the situation can be really, when we take this, they think of the British cat as real. The situation can be very, very encouraging. It could be very different. What we have presented already early is my colleague Gert Parma. We have counted some data about the burials of the middle Bronze Age of Moravia. We have shown that, figured out, that we have really changing corretus through the whole middle Bronze Age. As I have now showed in the Bronze Age, R2C on the late face of the Bronze Age II, we have as distinctive increase of burial burials as the above level ground burials. In the face, B2C1 prevailed in our data, the Tumuli in the C2 cremation burials. In day one, we have at most the burials above the ground level. So I would show here that this really long change. It's a long change under the early Bronze Age and the middle Bronze Age to the arm fields. Every time is changing one trace of the right. Let me show, very short, what is in the space development. We can see that our sides have the continuity under the early Bronze Age to the middle Bronze Age. And when we're looking for some break, it is not so big break. But on the side, Gullinu is Durka. We can show that, it is middle of Sintra Moravia. We can show that we have distance under the group of the Punietitsa graves and the Vieter group, one Vieter group, create this bar. So it is, when we are looking for some change, it could be on the end of the post-classical face and the Punietitsa culture is after the location of the sites. And when I concern on the settlements, only, I will speak only about the lowland settlements. So the head to location wasn't, then wasn't paid attention in the last years. It could be in the question for other research. So in the lowland settlements, I will take two traces of the change in the beginning of the early Bronze Age. These two traces are from the French houses, which appeared already on the end of the early Bronze Age. The first of them we have in the settlements of the Vieter group in Hodunitsa. This is a really precise dating. And the other we have in the settlements, which are as Vieter group as Tumul sculpture, as in the Tumul sculpture settlements, and later too. So I will already show, I will see here that we have the settlements from the early Bronze Age with the most household structures. And in the end, we have the other type of construction which began in the end of the early Bronze Age. The other, there is what I will show from the settlements. I will show that we have on the end of the early Bronze Age the pit, pit, trapezoid pits of the storage pits, which are really huge. And on the beginning of the middle Bronze Age, we have pits which are cylindrical or trapezoid too, which are really low volume. So it could be another change of the settlements we can take with the social organization or the interpretive as the influence with the crops which are planted in this time. But it is one of the changes which we can date it on those settlements. I want to, to the conclusions, I want to say that the changes could not speak about the changes. There are plant formations. It is a long transformation process of every of the type of our question as the way our eyes as, for example, the settlements. When we would speaking about the ecomonom, we would find very much of the changes which are in one long process of transition of the ecomonom from the early to the late Bronze Age. And we must take our data as the long processes. So when we take only one trace, we would really find the change. When we take all of the higher amount of the traces, we find that no one period is the same as the earlier period of that time. So thank you very much for your attention. And it's my fault.