 ding-bobber. I don't understand what their reasoning could be. If it's a private community with voluntary sign-up, isn't it fundamentally different than a public forum like Google search or YouTube, where at least though unjustified, they can say they don't want damaging information to be shown to everyone. That's one level you can think about it for sure. And one of the things that could happen is for any of these technocratic platforms, right, they could just not censor and any user that is loading information on, they could just have a little button there. That should have that for everyone, saying that the only people that can view this information are subscribers, right? Right? Or patrons. That way it's a private club, right? And the platform cannot be held liable. It's like suing a city because there is a club that has been formed in the city that does something that the majority do not agree with, right? Let's say a club forms in wherever city you are and something is illegal or shunned upon by society, bad, right, bad, evil. Reading a book could be considered evil right now, right? All of a sudden people find out about that and then they sue the city because that club is inside the city boundaries. What are you fucking crazy, right? This is a society that some of these morons want to create, right? And this is a society that we want to stay silent about, right? No, no, no, no, no, no, no, absolutely not, right? Gang, there's a cost to being a human. There's a cost to be free, okay? Sometimes it's monetary, sometimes it's spiritual, emotional, sometimes it's physical. You take the hit no matter what, true, stay true to yourself and to your ideals and never, ever, ever become a slave to centralized power.