 I think something that we are losing right now and something I really care about very much is this idea that you have to be singular as an artist. It can't be just copying can be part of the game obviously but and it should be at some point but you have to find the voice that's proper to you. And if today in Europe or I go to FilmFond or a broadcaster with a project and that's a screenplay and I tell them this is I'm gonna do this and chances are it's gonna be judged by commission and commissions are made of bureaucrats or pseudo-intellectuals disguising it so I don't know civil servants and they're gonna go for the average. They always go for the average. So in a way the films that you're gonna see chances are in the European system America is different it's a different hell but I mean we might talk about it later but in Europe I'm just talking about what I know it's always gonna be the last singular possible. I mean I know because in my first film it was a terrible war to make it happen. So there is an institutional reluctance to anything that's singular that's why I'm so I'm so impressed by painters because they can really you know they don't need stupid commissions. They can make their movies you know and my own master Bellatars just told me that you have to make your movie you know that's whatever it takes take your iPhone. And it's strange that the more people take their iPhones to make their movies the more standardized everything gets. You know it's weird that we have the diversity of point of views but people copy each other like never before even in the Western world singularity is despised because for many reasons why are people putting themselves on TikTok to watch themselves and communicate what they have to say. Is it democracy? I don't want to see your face. I don't want to say I'm not interested. Is it like the expression of art? This bullshit. I mean for me as a filmmaker obstacles are part of the difficult the struggle is with yourself, with the material, material world the physical world that's always been part of the human expression. And now we're fucking it up sorry for my language with the because we're in love with technology we want to give so much of our power to the computer and zeros and ones and you know it's gonna bring us to hell way before the climate change screws us up. I often or even what you said earlier about oh you have to make that movie even if it takes taking your iPhone to make the movie but then when many people are doing it it's not really worth it anymore or it just it's very it's not really good anymore so I often wonder because my generation what a lot of artists are doing is because the struggle of you know financially but also getting represented getting attention is so hard and it's so gate kept it's reliant on very old structures so they take their phones and the poets they publish their work online the painters they film their process all of these things so what we are doing our generation of artists we go online a big part of them and but because we do that it often gets devalued by older institutions and I mean there is a point for what art what art is good but we have I personally think we have found an answer to this because we have these means in technology where we can cheer each other up or find solutions but then how are we supposed to do that like how are we going to cheer them up you're speaking as what last law you want to say no I just wanted to say something to this so I mean when I talk to studio people all the time like executives in Hollywood all they want to do is please the youth there's nothing I mean they want to second guess the audience to the extent that they want to bring it down to their imagined audience so they take everybody for idiots basically they're possibly very idiotic themselves so they're definitely not keeping the gates for you know old people they want to make films for the imagined young people they don't even exist