 Well, first of all, thank you for the invitation. I hope everybody, then we can have some questions at the end. We're going to do our best to be on time to make sure that you have all the information possible. And then we can, of course, follow up with the questions. So basically, the presentation is going to be myself and Leandro. I'm Gaston Wright, the Chancellor's Director in the Southern Corn, and Leandro is the Chancellor's Director for campaigns in the Southern Corn as well. And we want to talk to you briefly about a project we carried out in Argentina last year. Just to put you in context, last year we have general elections in Argentina at all levels, presidential, municipal, governors, representatives in both the House and the Senate. And the reason why we wanted to carry out this project is because in the past, I would say, in the three previous election processes, we have seen a substantial growth in traffic on the platform between 30% to 35% of growth in terms of traffic. And it was very difficult for us to make sure that we were driving that traffic to content created by users into a specific landing page where we were able to showcase all the petitions that were targeted to candidates for the election process plus the decision makers with the capacity to respond to petitions. So the objective of this project was, as this slide says, give a space for candidates to engage with citizen-led petitions. This is just how the platform looked like. Very simple showing the same sort of layout of petitions that we have on the regular Chanchradorc platform, but now coupled and everything into a single movement called Elections Argentina. And then the responses of decision makers also being very visible, which is something that in Chanchradorc, as the traditional platform, you have to go to the petition to see if the petition has any responses. Here what we wanted is to showcase all the petitions in a single space. And that's we have the tab on the landing page that says responses. And then in the landing page, we're also able to see all the petitions, all the signatures aggregated, and all the traffic and all the interactions happening. We want to give you some metrics, because I think this is important for you in order to put in context why this has been so successful for us in terms of doing something very different. We did this with the support from Luminate. It was a bet because we have never done this in the past, and Luminate decided to take the bet with us. And I think this shows that we can do this in the future, not only for elections, but any other movement with citizen lets campaign that are sort of aggregated in a single space. So Leandro, go ahead and please tell the folks about some of the impact we have had. OK, thanks Gaston. As Gaston said, this is the metrics that we always see to measure the online impact of the platform. Well, first, the number of petitions. This shows us if the people is using the platform for petitioning the authorities, 200, more than 200 petitions were created and specifically asking for public policy, laws, general changing, targeting candidates in the context of the election. To give you an idea, between 150 and 200 petitions are created on the platform weekly. Well, signatures is another metric that we always use. We got almost 8 million signatures in this movement. We have in general and historically in the platform like 1.2 million signatures per month. As you can see in the chart, there are two spikes during the first was during the official launching of the electoral campaign. In August, we have the primary election. So there is another spike there. For example, in June, we got more than 3 million signatures. This is a lot of signatures. The other one is unique visitors. That is almost like 3 million unique visitors in the platform, which means like 8.7% of the official eligible voters in Argentina. This is something that we always show to the politician and media, because signatures also means voters. We got like 800,000 new users. That means people singing a petition for the first time in Argentina. To give you an idea, we get like 250,000 signatures monthly, historically. And as Gaston said, the idea was to have responses and 86 responses of politicians talking directly to citizens in the context of the election. The total of responses in 2019 was 146 responses. So it shows that the politician took advantage of the opportunity to respond in the context of the election. The next one is victories. Victory means that in this context was like 19 citizens that got a positive, responsive, an action from the authorities in the context of the election. Gaston? Can you hear me? You were in mute, Gaston. Oh, OK, perfect. Yeah. So I want to talk to you now about the most signed petition. Can you see the screen, right? Yes, I think you can. This is a very interesting petition, because it is a petition about clean slate. So basically, a super user in Argentina created a petition focusing on one of the specific themes of the campaign in Argentina, which was issues around corruption. The petition got 345,000 signatures. And one of the things that we were extremely surprised is the level of engagement of candidates and decision makers in terms of answering this petition. So the petition was basically asking the Congress to put on the agenda of passing a law similar to a law that exists in Brazil, where citizens in Argentina that have any sort of issues with corruption in the past with the judicial system won't be able to participate on the electoral process. The petition got so much attention in the media that not only we were able to get 16 decision makers answering the petition, basically saying what they were doing in the Congress in order to move forward with the petition, but also the campaign reached the Congress with two petition deliveries. So this is just a petition delivery. And here you can see a lot of people in this photo. These are a combination of journalists, the petition starter, who is there, the bold guy, similar to me. He's a petition starter. Then we have senators. We have judges. We have journalists. We have a bunch of house representatives. And also the person in the middle of the petition behind the banner is the president at that point of the Commission for Constitutional Issues. The petition reached the point of approval in the commission. The commission approved the passing of the law. And then it was stopped in the house and then put on hold until the next year. So now the law is at the stage where it is still being negotiated among the political parties. Now I want to move a little bit more into how we engage decision makers, which I think there are a couple of very interesting things to tell you. So basically what we develop is a tool that it's called a decision maker profile. So these are, for example, three important candidates in Argentina at three different levels. One is a governor. Another one is a candidate for president for a left-wing party. And then the other one is a counselor for a relatively mid-sized city. So basically the way it works, and then you will see that later on, is that we develop this functionality where this profile, which is a verified profile similar to the Twitter verified profile, allows the decision makers that are targeted to specific petitions on the elections movement to get in touch directly with the signers by a system that allows them to send massive messages to the signers. You will see that later on, but the proposal is very attractive. And the fact that we were launching this at the same time of the electoral process, it was very interesting for them as a way of doing campaigning, but also as a way of creating this new model of digital accountability. So in order to do that and to engage with decision makers, we have a two-fold strategy. The first one was something that we call high-touch engagement with decision makers and their communication teams. So we carry out several activities. One was that before the primaries and during the primaries, we invited to the change of their office consultants and people working in the comms teams for the candidates to better understand how the decision maker profile work vis-à-vis the petitions that we were putting on the elections movement. That helped get a better understanding of the public, also answer a lot of questions, and making sure that we were creating some sort of a connection with them and showing examples. Also, it was critical to travel across Argentina, going to the most important provinces, the most important electoral districts. So the team of Change.org, here, Leandro and two of the campaigners visited the main electoral districts to engage with decision makers at the very local level, and that's the reason why we have a high number of very local decision makers that were responding very local petitions. And also media. Media was a very, very important factor. So not only we coupled these trips with meetings, 101 meetings with comms teams and decision makers and candidates, but also we took the opportunity to show the local media content created by Change.org users in those specific provinces that were targeting candidates that people know at the local level. So that's a very, very successful strategy to the point that we got 189 media hits talking about several petitions on the platform in different media outlets at the local level. Leandro, if you can talk a little bit about the digital outreach strategy. Yes, thank you. So after several meetings, we realized that WhatsApp and Twitter are the most effective channel to get in touch and work with politicians and their comms teams. So trust is also important to work with them. So as you see before, we traveled to the main electoral district to have one-on-one meetings. There is something very important, like before a meeting or a phone call with a politician or an advisor, we researched their profile. So we asked ourselves that what are their particular interests? What projects do they have? What commission do they take part in the Congress? We see their Twitter or Facebook or Instagram to see what do they like to talk about. So another and very important thing is to make some professional presentation for them. I think that data is the key. Sorry. So yes, data is the key. So we show them users of change.org in their district. The percentage of the voters participate in change in their provinces or cities. We show them a lot of charts, like for example, the top five of topics that people like to participate in change. Why voters are participating in change in their district. I think that this is very, very important for them. The last thing is that we show the opportunity to respond. We show them that it is easy that there are trolls in the platform. No haters. It is real people that participate in change. It is safe. One of the most important things is that it is free. It is a free tool because they always ask what is the price of the tool. We give them an easy example to start. A non-controversial petition, something very easy to respond. We give them support with material guides, presentation. We show them that they contact very easily via WhatsApp or phone call that we are very open for questions. Finally, we said that there are many politicians taking advantage of the tool. Why don't you? This is, for example, one of the... Can you hear me guys? Yes. This is one example here. This is a reply of the city of Buenos Aires mayor. This is how it looks like in the platform. Then all the 45,000 people received this response on their inbox. Then people can comment on the responses, which creates a huge engagement with the users. Just to give you an idea, the open rate of these emails sent by decision makers is on average around 34-37%. People are eager to see these emails from decision makers. Then I want to do very quickly some metrics around revenue. This Chanchador is fully funded by individual donors. We were able to use the platform as a way of engaging donors. 962 monthly donors acquired since March on the specific landing page of petitions around the election process. That totals around $50,000 in donations in a period of 12 months. It is more because the lifespan of these donors is longer. This is a significant amount of money considering our annual budget in Argentina. 161 petitions were promoted. 106 petitions generated recurring donors. That is 45% of the petitions were able to engage donors. There are monthly donors, which is a really good number for us. That's pretty much it. I'm sure you will have some questions. We're under the tyranny of time, but I think it's great. We'll follow up later on and you have our emails there. Thank you, guys.