If THIS video still leaves you with doubts, the following link will take you to a video where Opie & Anthony discuss Walsh using his "broadcast" voice when in the Fox & Friends studio... the different, deeper, "fatherly" voice Walsh is using is discussed over and over again in this video. From 2004: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMxebY...
It is RIDICULOUS to decide that two people are the same person, simply because they sound alike in ONE recording - when recording situations, audio levels, mic levels, background noise or lack thereof, the mood of the person being recorded, and so many other variables can effect SOUND. This is why law enforcement TAKES YOUR PICTURE, not a recording of your voice, as identification. A recording can be used to back up other information, but it cannot be the SOLE basis for identification.
Here we look at the visual and audio records of these men and see that Mark Walsh is Harley guy from 9/11, just as he's been for over 12 years now, and Nick Pugh is simply Nick Pugh. Pugh may be a false witness as well, but he's certainly NOT Harley Guy. Mark Walsh already holds that position... the THINKING Truthers, and Mark, and everyone who knows him, are aware of this...
Thanks very much to Falcon6073 for uploading the Opie & Anthony show clips that were very helpful here. (http://www.youtube.com/user/falcon607...)
FAIR USE STATEMENT (FU)
"Section 107 [of Title 17, U.S.C.] contains a list of the
various purposes for which the reproduction of a
particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and
research.
This is, obviously, media criticism and parody. Any attempt to subvert the right of the people to employ the Fair Use Doctine will be zealously defended.
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/...
