 All right, so essentially what we're getting ready to do is load a hand refueler. Those ramps are one of the issues that we're trying to address. The model that we're currently making will kind of mimic this. What we're trying to do is account for this unit, an air conditioning unit, the 808, which you'll see later, and an 802, which is not going to be loaded during this load procedure. The negative space is what we're trying to address. The ramp will be multiple units that will fill in the negative space and allow us to have one continuous go. By increasing the angle of attack, we're going to account for the negative space on the ramp's toe and account for that space right there where the two pieces are. This will give us less risk. It'll be made out of metal so we won't have to worry about the wood component of it for moving to countries that don't allow for plywood and be a safer load overall. All right, so one other thing that we want to make note of is we had to take in this particular mission two different types of ramps. This set of ramps was made and constructed solely for the truck that's going to go and support the mission. The reason we had to make two different types is to account for the difference of axle size. Whatever bog tail we end up using might have a different axle. The back end in this case is wider than the front and the axle, the ramps that we were using for the refuel bowser were too narrow. So they had to immediately construct these wide ones. Had we had one universal ramp that met the 808, the handy refueler and the bog tail, we wouldn't have to bring all the extra weight. The time of setting it up, we could have just had it sitting down and loaded all the equipment regardless of the units needing a ramp or not and saved a lot of time in loading. So that's another consideration that we had to take in. Plus the longevity. If we end up using this type of model and we're using an 808, I'm sorry, an 802, and the wheels aren't right, we run that risk of the front axle kicking and that causes a greater risk of damage to the aircraft. Additionally, these ones wear much more over time and over a course of multiple loads. The ramp angle actually starts becoming inverted, which makes it almost impossible to use and then makes the mission that much harder and more dangerous. So just one more of those other things to consider. Thank you. Okay, so now that the load process has been finished, things that we want to really touch based on and the importance of them were looking at the shoring. We addressed why we have the shoring, but why we use the shoring, but we weren't really making sure to put emphasis on what the main point of it is. In the video, we put emphasis on a drain plug that's on the 808. The reason for the shoring and plywood being put up the way it was is to account for as we're going up the ramp, there's a raised point. When we get to that point, the drain plug runs the risk of hitting and if we don't have the correct amount of plywood put on, actually the drain plug will hit the aircraft ramp and damage it. So when we're looking at it, even with all the plywood that we used, we barely cleared it by about maybe an inch, inch and a quarter. That's a huge risk. Additionally, if you look at how many pieces that we used, that is not the correct amount that's on the load. Traditionally, we only have per 808 three pieces. In a nice warm weather, it still wasn't enough. We had to use another five, I think five pieces to do that to make the ramp the way it was and then it still cracked along the way, which you can see in the video. If we had that splinter as they were loading up and break, thankfully it didn't, it just cracked and this was all brand new plywood that was cut. I think it cost the age flight 1,800 bucks to do or the MXS flight to cut it all. That's just the material, 1,800 bucks. Had it splintered and broke and dropped down into the space on the ramp, you could have run the risk of damaging the aircraft, despite having all of it preset. They then added more plywood and small pieces, kind of like a runner, to help account for that drop and strengthen it up. But if those pieces weren't there and they only had that 1,808 with those three pieces, effectively couldn't have loaded the aircraft. It would have ran the risk of damaging it. In the wintertime, the foam tires, the tires on the 808 are made of foam. It contracts. You need even more wood to clear that gap. So those are the huge pieces that we need to take into consideration. If we build it out of metal, we don't have to worry about it cracking. We don't have to worry about the missing of that gap because we've increased the height and allowed for it to go up all at once. So it's a much safer and less risk to the aircraft. So those are the things that we really want to address in here is the way we're doing it currently makes absolutely no sense. You run the risk of a FOD hazard because none of that plywood has a worldwide identifier on it. The plywood amount that we're using is not accurate in any way shape or form. We have to use multiple ones from multiple units to build the ramp to begin with. You're running the risk, even with all of that, the clearance, an inch and a quarter. Why gamble it? There's no need. It can be completely avoided. And again, all the setup time. We wouldn't have to do any of that. We put the ramp down, we bring the aircraft ramp onto it, and we just load. That's the end of the operation. If we had to go to a base that allows the plywood but then for some reason have to forward deploy out of there to a base that wouldn't have that plywood, allow that plywood, we run the risk of then saying all that has to go on to a C-17 and hoping that that same amount of stuff comes back, which isn't realistic. It would totally impact the mission as far as being able to be mobile. Because if we go to a base and they say that and the host country says that this is not allowed, all that has to go, that equipment effectively is lost and stuck there until we can get the proper equipment or the new shoring built from host country and then set back up. Another part of loading an aircraft besides the ramps is what's called sleeper shoring. This is the shoring that goes up underneath the axles and allows for an event that the aircraft hits turbulence. It helps absorb and reduce shock and bouncing. All it is is again plywood. We cut it up into small squares anywhere between 8 to 13 inch squares and it slides up underneath the axles and then we cargo strap it to the floor. How we store them is usually we just toss it into onto the unit or it's onto the side of the frame of the unit. Again, no worldwide identifier, no real tracking purposes, and every unit's different so the heights can always change even per the type of model that we're using. In 808 we might use 7 to 8 pieces and on another one we might use 6 and another one we might use 10. It all depends on how much the axles have rested and the leaf springs have settled. That's really it. Again, we're doing a process that is just not useful or beneficial and that's where we're trying to propose these guys. I bought this off of GSA Advantage as part of the SIF project. It was an innovation project that we were trying to push. Basically, all these are our blocks that you use for vehicles and storage. They have a channel in them to where you can actually put the cargo strap in so we're not running the risk of fighting them and the plywood tipping over because they stack nicely. They stack nicely, easy to use. We could put a worldwide identifier on them and put them in a kit and assign that kit to a select unit. It's just part of the mobility process. We know how many we've sent out. We know how many we're getting back. You're saving money. You're saving time. You're reducing the risk of this coming loose during a load during transportation. It's not uncommon for those pieces because you're just stacking plywood that isn't really secured by any way. Sometimes we use tape. In this case, in the video, we didn't. That's all going to come loose. That shoring essentially doesn't make any sense. It's just falling all over the aircraft or at least under the unit. It's a trip hazard if people were walking. Then we got to pick it all back up and make sure it's accounted for and hope we have all the pieces that we started with. Hopefully, as part of this innovation project, this will be a part of that consideration. I hope that this overall captures the true need of why we're trying to do the ramp. Thank you so much for your time.