The Truth about 'Fake Snow' conspiracy





The interactive transcript could not be loaded.



Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Jan 30, 2014

This is my response to all the 'fake snow' videos. Snow has a volume of 90% air, and has thermal insulative properties. If you try to burn it with a lighter, some of it is evaporating (sublimation) and what is melting is being absorbed into the air spaces. Anyone who made it to the 3rd grade should know this. If you try to burn it with a cigarette lighter, the flame will leave black soot on the snow the same as anything else exposed to the flame of a lighter.

I am aware of the High Altitude Auroral Research Program, but snow will respond this way whether or not it is a warm or cold climate, or whether or not it is caused by modified weather patterns or natural anomalies.

I gather the speculations are believed by those who don't know what the HAARP acronym stands for, or those who are not experienced with snow. And no one had the idea to burn snow with a lighter until the advent of the internet and video sharing.

I don't discount that these programs (chem trails, cloud seeding, etc) or conspiracies have merit, but i do use ration and logic for making judgement about these ideas. I ask all of you who believe in this right away to at least have some sort of understanding of atmospheric dynamics and the behavior or water vapor (the water cycle you learned in the 3rd grade)

I don't think the snow is fake, but i wouldn't eat it over the idea that there could be trace radioactive from the Fukushima contamination.


When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...