 May 40 here. So in Steve Steele's column he was talking about what do the Republicans have to do to combine the two key elements of their coalition, the working class and the managerial class. What are possible policies that can appeal to both the working class and the managerial class? So traditionally the Republican base was the country club set, the managerial class, but now Republicans are increasingly down-market, increasingly populist, increasingly the party of the working class. How can they regain the managerial class? So I think the Republicans number one about winning issue is crime. So anything they can do is to emphasize their crime-fighting program. So locking up super predators, laws like three strikes and you're out, tough law and order, and making the streets safer, locking away bad guys. And that seems like a pretty good program for Republicans you'd think would apply an appeal to both the managerial class and the working class because the managerial class needs assurance that there will be safety to invest and to plan, to program things and to accomplish great things, right? You need safety. Working class is more vulnerable than the managerial class and they're more likely to live near super predators. So I think a tough law and order platform is likely to be quite appealing to both the managerial class and the working class. Anything you can do to reduce crime rates, that should appeal to both classes. Reducing immigration should particularly appeal to the working class, but to the extent that it's part of a law and order platform that also should appeal to the managerial class. The managerial class wants assurance that you can have law and order, that you can plan for the waterhead. And so if you tie in the immigration controls as part of making the waterhead more knowable, so that you can plan more rationally, that should appeal to both the managerial class and the working class. Then being anti-work culture, I would think would appeal to both the managerial class and the working class. It would be much more appealing to the workers, but if you can roll back on that extreme civil rights legislation or simply roll back enforcement of it, reduces prestige, reduce incentives to engage in lawfare, reduce the power of civil rights legislation to disrupt businesses, disrupt communities, disrupt individual lives, I think that could be a powerful winner of both managerial class and the working class. And then trade restriction. That should appeal to working class, reshoring jobs, bringing jobs back home, manufacturing more in the United States. That should be appealing to the working class. And that also creates jobs for the managerial class, creates opportunity to profit from trade restriction. So the finance class, the Wall Street class, probably won't appreciate trade restriction as much as the working class and the managerial class, but Wall Street overwhelmingly votes for the Democrats. Then non-interventionist foreign policy, a few stupid wars abroad that could appeal to both the working class, who would traditionally fight such wars, and a managerial class who wants safety, doesn't want the economy upended by all these crazy crusades overseas to remake other nations engaged in nation building. So a sober foreign policy, like what Donald Trump engaged in, he didn't start any new wars, he doused back intervention overseas. And I think that should be a winner for both the working class and the managerial class. And he moved towards a less litigious society. Less money going to lawyers, less prestige going to litigation. If your incentives to engage in litigation, anything that Republican administration could do to reduce the incentives to file lawsuits, that could appeal to both the managerial class and the working class. You're more selective with how you subsidize education, right? So not paying off people's student loans, being more selective in the funding of education, making it more socially acceptable for people to go from high school right into work, reducing the need for everyone to go to college. That should be appealing for the working class and the managerial class. And then you're defunding the radical left, which is launching many of its attacks on traditional society from the Academy. So maybe less subsidizing of these radical left-wing attacks from the Academy onto traditional American values in American society. That could be a winner for both the working class and the managerial class. Some thoughtful deregulation to encourage entrepreneurship, to encourage the formation of new businesses, the expansion of businesses. So if it's intelligently done, thoughtfully done, that could appeal to both the working class and the managerial class. Sometimes that might mean tax cuts, or just this onerous regulation that is doing more harm than good. Building infrastructure, improving America's infrastructure, that should get support from both our managerial class and their working class. And a more nationalist America, a nationalist foreign policy, a more self-interested foreign policy. A less idealistic foreign policy, less about nation building and making the world safe with democracy and more about America first. That should appeal to both the working class and the managerial class. But Trumpism, to be effective, can't just be a reaction. Can't just be a populist reaction that needs institutions, intellectual institutions, think tanks, to push it forward.