 So here the idea is that there's really, somebody has really figured out how to run our automobiles on water, ocean water, even better with lots of, you know, so it's abundant, it's free, and yet all companies buy up these innovations and prevent them from being public in order to keep the profits from oil because they would be destroyed if it turned out to be water. And I find these ideas ludicrous because if somebody actually created a motor that could run on water, he could make so much money. I mean, there's no oil company that could buy him out because think about the potential of such a thing. It's enormous. And the oil company could make a fortune off of it. Yes, they couldn't make it off of selling water maybe, but these engines would have to be new and they'd have to be completely new technologies. I mean, they could start an auto company. They would make a fortune. So the idea is, I'm going to kill this innovation, which is going to revolutionize the world so that I can keep a technology that's actually going to make me less money. I mean, if the profit maximizes, they would adopt a new technology. So, you know, I think competition for the innovation, the fact that if it's a real innovation venture, capitalists would fund it, private equity guys would fund it. I think that if this innovation was really that profitable, that breakthrough, then all companies would buy it and use it and bring it out there because they could make a lot of money off of it. I just don't see the logic. I just don't buy. I just don't see how it would work that you had this amazing innovation and somebody would buy it to kill it. There is actually a good movie where this is portrayed. It's a wrong premise, but the movie's pretty good. I think it's called The Man in the White Suit. And it's an old British movie, I think, from the 1950s. In spite of the false premise, I recommend the movie because it's very well made and very well acted.