 All right, it is 530 weeks of work getting to order, so with roll call, I'll flip her's item in. Over here. Rusty present. Health person. Here. Okay. We'll start with the buttons. I believe this is a good sign of the United States of America and into the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. I guess since we have a guest, we will do quick introduction. I'm Dean Deckard, chair of the committee, health person from District 6. It's your item in District 10, Southside. Zach Ross, District 8 vice chair. I'm Angela Ray. I'm Josh Shizonen. Subillian. I'm Stuart McCormick, Public Works. Joe Curlin, Public Works. Ryan Seizel, Public Works. Hutterberg, Public Works. David Peeble, Public Works. Okay. We'll move on to approval from November 20th. I move approved. Second. Second. Any discussion on those minutes? All in favor? Aye. All in favor? Aye. Okay. Number 6, Harrow, 2723, 1-4, submitted letter from Dr. Seizel, and then asking permission to actually hunt on parcel number 5 and 4, 3, 2, 8. Yes, we received a letter from Josh, who is here this evening, seeking permission to hunt this area of land, which is primarily a large area. It's actually been outside the city, but it's city-owned. It was gifted for many years. And it's since then been being managed by the Glacial Lakes Conservancy. Same group that is managing our sugar property in the farm. Actually, I'll get up here. So based on our past practices and consistency with the alignment in our practices, that we've made no exceptions for hunting on city-owned property. Hunting is allowed in the city on private lands, especially if it was a lot of this size, given the setback requirements for hunting, such as at our prior meeting of the private property on the south side of Sheboy in the Garment Farm. Or Romer Farm, for instance. So it would be our recommendation to deny the request and buy a file or letter. You know, the gentleman's here this evening, Josh. He has said a few so-desired to listen to his side. You know, I think that would be appropriate. But I just wanted to give you a background at least of how we've handled this as a request in the past. What is Glacial Lakes? What are their comments? I'm assuming... You have to run a little correction. They have a little governance over it. It's not managed by them. It is still city property. Basically, Maywood is more responsible for managing the property than for anybody. It's a weird Glacial Lakes part of it. They haven't done anything other than go in there and look at it every few years and say, well, this really needs to be done, this needs to be done. So they're part of it, but it's more Maywood and it's more city. Thank you, sir. We just had a discussion at the board meeting on that, where they were in and they cleaned up some paths or something. Maywood on with a scope. We provided them the machinery and then they had volunteers and they did the cleanup with the scope group. I don't know if you'll listen to what I'm trying to say. Someone has the same answer. Well, so I lived half the time in the subdivision right across the street. That's how I found this parcel and then I used my hunting maps to find it. And I just thought it was strange that it's a city-owned property outside. It would be in the township, so I figured I don't know. I've noticed a lot of deer there. I mean, I'm there almost every single deer I've ever passed out. So I figured I'd ask for permission to try and hunt it. Any other comments? I get your desire to want to hunt there, but I just think that if we open this up, we would have a lot of problems. I think we would have a lot of people wood, things like that. People in Maywood board, things like that that would not be happy with this. You know, there is probably sometimes an old population deer in that area. Just the hunting of the city property, I think, would not go over well with the constituency. In fact, you were talking about there was some deer stands up in there. They went in to clean, they took the deer stands down. And I don't know if these people keep going back in there because, like you said, there are really not a lot of people over there that use that park. So, again, with a lot of people to hunt on other pieces of city property, why would we make the exception now? Against the ordinance. We've had this come before us before the past, and the precedence has been that we haven't done it. I think if we did it now, I think we would be then, you know, opening up other ones we've had in the past and the other sections of the city that people would be wanting to do it. And I just, I don't think that's what the constituents for the most part want. So, if you're looking for a motion to file this, it would be the best way to do this, yes? Okay. Move to file. Second. Which was made in the second of the file. Any other discussion? All in favor? Aye. Terrible. Aye. Is that it? Okay. That's sure. So, the next public property, is that open to Maywood? Can I walk in there at any time then? Yes. Yes. Okay. Without a bowl. With a bowl. I am. I'll use it. It's going to be an educational area. But yes, it's open to the public. I was going to say, because when I saw it, I'm like, strange to the public. Just keep it. This is the first... If somebody's here, don't go in there, and it's because they want to... I'm not here. I'm here. I'm here. Excuse me, I'm just asking about the number of people that I work with. Because this is just a request of here. That's owned by Glacier Lakes. That one was purchased through a grant, and went to say to somebody that's all open to. Can I walk in there any time? That's all the reasons why they don't have to come in. happening, the people walking through there. I know it was a big thing with being inside City Limits, you can't hunt it within City Limits. That's why I didn't know if the township was different. It's not within limits. All righty, we'll move on to number seven. Resolution number 109-2324. Resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to execute the second amendment to operating between City of Shawrigan and Port Pond, LLC. I guess this would be a joke. Yeah, okay, you know, just a really quick update. So this prior agreement will reach its first agreement with an amendment, will meet its natural ending at the end of the year. So that's why we're here to to do a new agreement. He did ask that instead of doing a longer term one, he's unaware of what's going to happen in the future with him and his family. There's some conditions where he may change and he doesn't want to go out and work on another five, ten-year agreement. He said he'll know more after this year. So he's just basically asking instead of doing that all right now, asking for a one-year amendment, we changed a few things that we've already kind of do on anyway already. And those are kind of written out. Those are written out, you know, just instead of five days a week, yes, it'll be at least open three days a week. The three-hand is repealed. That's we're done with the fencing and stuff. And number four is just basically kind of cleaning up the names and stuff like that. So not a lot of just asking men for a year so we can go on through next year and where he'll be in a better place knowing where he'll be. Questions for anyone? Yeah, it's been a great thing to have there. If he does not continue next year, I hope we can find someone else to do this. I think it's a lot of citizens like it then. So I hope that we can do anything we can do to help. I mean he's had some challenges over that one year. He's had some challenges running it and anything we can do to help him out is appropriate. So looking for a motion then. Any other discussions? Okay, all in favor? Aye. Chair votes aye. That is approved. Okay, next meeting date is set as December 26th but we're hoping not to have a meeting that day is what the consensus of the committee is. So unless there's something emergency-wise we're encouraging the director to do it. I'll make sure something comes up. I don't really foresee anything on the horizon that we would have to have a meeting. He's going out there and bust a pipe. Cool.