 I'm going to present ourselves, so Esther Donardo, Donardo Vison, Flavio Ozzelli and Martina Massimino. We're going to present our movement today based in Italy. It's called in Italian, mi riconosci sono professionista di beni culturali, which means, do you recognise me? I am a professional in the field of cultural heritage. So first of all, it's worth mentioning that it's not a movement inclusive of just archaeologists, but it includes other professions in the field of cultural heritage as well. So for example, anthropologists, touristic guides, art historians, librarians and as the name itself says, our main aim is to claim for more visibility in the media. And today we're going to address the question, can cultural heritage workers and professionals occupy the middle of political and social debate? So I'm just going to say what exactly our movement is, how it was born, how it developed and then Alunard is going to give examples of how we act. So in Italian our movement is what we call Collettivo, so a group of activists joined together by common goals in 90 years. It was born in November 2015 as a campaign for fair access to the professions in the field of cultural heritage. And since then it has grown in numbers and also in results. So now we've got a number of activists covering pretty much every region in Italy so the whole country. So in this light we have three principles which are based on our own analysis of the Italian situation and which have been guiding our actions. So we think at the moment the relevance of cultural heritage is ignored by the media and especially the working conditions of the professionals are pretty much unknown to external people. At the same time all the different professionals, not all the archaeologists but also the other categories I listed face similar problems. So we've been trying to join together all these professions to find a solution and overturn the domino view provided by the media. Very briefly about our strategy. So we've got a website where we publish articles to give information. We use very much social networks such as Facebook and Instagram. We have a group dealing for example with Ruffix. So our ways to communicate with the public is through social media, videos, articles. So these are three elements of our action. First of all information to share information with the public and at the same time try to overturn the dominant narrative about cultural heritage and working conditions. A second element is protest and then necessary is to make proposals to change the situation. So then I was going to give some examples about how we act. Yeah, so basically when we started, we launched this movement, we had a real need to say something new and basically our analysis was much appreciated but the response we had was absolutely incredible because we cannot define it in another way. So I'm showing you some examples of this strategy which is information protest proposal. It's always of course not linear in the sense sometimes the information is a protest or proposal is given before or joined with protest so it's just an idea. The first example is basically this case. On the 2nd of January 2016 we wrote this article in our blog which was totally new launched a month before about the fact that the Minister of Cultural Heritage of Italy was looking for volunteers to work at the Colosseum in Rome for the Jubilee and we were asking for volunteers with highly specialized so with graduations and even doctor ships and so on. We wrote this article and the response has been absolutely incredible. It was shared by thousands of people because what for us, at least in Italy, it's quite normal. It wasn't known by other people in Italy the fact that at the Colosseum we were looking for volunteers and so we started after just a month of life to be called by many journalists from all over Italy and in a month we got a good space in most of the national newspapers and on national television and this was the beginning of our movement because we understood that people were ready to get interested in these working conditions and basically we did it all the time and giving you just two other examples. In Italy there is a very powerful trust which is called FAI and we are working with volunteers but we thought for years that basically they have a good power and they should change their practices working with volunteers and the way they communicate on the media. Basically they ignored us for two years and so we decided to write on our blog just a simple list of questions about what they do and their practices and they got ridiculously scared about it. Everyone started to speak about it and we got a meeting with management, they were governing and now they decided to listen to our requests and they promised to change their practices. Another example is about volunteering in Italy. Basically in 1993 they decided that volunteers can do basically everything in museums, archives and libraries. This led to lower degrees of steepness and everything because of course if you have volunteers who can do everything of course you don't spend so much money for professionals. So we spoke about it for two years with articles and everything. We created a base and then we prepared a low proposal to ask the Italian parliament to regulate the use of volunteers in cultural sites and museums. This proposal has been presented to the media and the parliament this January and now we have a new government and everything but we are trying to get that low because we think it's extremely relevant to change the situation. So these are just three examples. If you can read the time you can read our site but I don't think it's the case but these are just three examples. Basically it worked so well along these years but our aim has partially changed or extended. Our aim now is to change the work market rules for cultural heritage and beyond because we think that what we are doing with cultural heritage is interesting for every kind of worker around Europe. It's a matter of flow, it's a matter of unpaid working and decrease of stipends and the only way to do it we think it's just becoming politically and socially relevant as a category. So basically to move the most possible amount of votes because politicians want to be reelected so we think that we have to try to become something like a mass movement so occupying more and more space on the media and the political debate. We think that many people are interested in cultural heritage and we are realizing that when they know about our working conditions they are quite surprised and shocked and they are ready to do something for us. So the question is, this kind of plan, does it work only for Italy or is it something which can be applied in other European countries? This is a question for all of you we don't know and now in the 6th of October we will get to another step because we are having a rally for culture and work market in Rome which will be the first rally made by cultural workers so with all workers of the cultural field all together and we don't know how it's going, we hope well, we hope very well. So yeah, that's it.