 Mae'r iawn. Trump yn ymddiwch i'r llyfr. Felly yn ymddiwch i'r llyfr. Yn ymddiwch, y cyfnodd, y cyfnodd, yn ymddiwch i'r llyfr. Donald J. Trump, y 450th ymddiwch i'r Unedig sydd y Meri. A'r llyfr yn ymddiwch. Rwy'n du'r wneud o'r cwmaint… Andrew Knee. Ac rai'n ei ddifemodd lleonydd ei hyn yn ymddiwch i'r Llywodraeth. Ac rai'n ei ddifemodd. Mae'n gweithio... Mae ymddwch chi'n gwoith. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Mae'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio'n gweithio. Dyn ni'n gwybod, pof arall, Ac mae'n gweithio'n ysgrifennu i'w ddweud o'r sorgdau, o'r ddweud, yn ffordd y ddogfod wedi'i ddod yn y ffordd. Rwy'n ddod ddod o'r ddod, o'r ddod o'r ddod yn tyfnod i'r cyffredinol, ac oedd yn cyffredinol. Well, what a turnaround? Colossal turnaround, involving a number of states which have always been traditionally anyway, Democrats such as Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, working class states incidentally, the traditionally democratic as I've said suddenly shifted to the Republicans, or more correctly They blame the American people. They blame the American public that they are racist, that they are reactionaries, that they're crazy, that they're ignorant, and so on. Of course they blame the working class in particular. And of course this is entirely wrong. What is true is that none of these people understood the real process is taking place in America and that goes for other countries also. A dyna'n deall yn Brytyn, sydd ydych yn ymgyrchau y cwestiynau ar y mewn eu sefydliadau, y Brexit. Yn ymgyrch ar gyfer, a dwi wedi nhw'n rhoi'n ddych chi'n gwneud ychydig o'r reall ymgyrch, a'r ddechrau nhw'n gwneud yn y Rhaid-Nswyf a Rhaid-Nswyf, ond rhaid yn yw'n gwneud. Rhaid, ond rhaid yn ni'n gwneud yng Nghymru sy'n ymgyrch o'r Rhaid-Nswyf a'r protofasysau mewn gwirio. The real reason for that was it was a kind of gut instinct revolt against the status quo in the case of Britain against the political elite in Westminster. This Westminster bubble including both Tories and right-wing Labour by the way, and the parliamentary Labour party who of course you couldn't distinguish between them. A dwi'n meddwl, wrth gwrs, roedd yna'n cwmpfyrddol iawn o'r ddweud, o'r llaw o'r cyflwyll, i gynfaith yn fawr, o'r ddiweddol iawn o'r rhawn. Rwy'n cyfrifio yw'n gweithio'r cyflwyll o'r ddweud, o'r ddweud yno'r unrhyw o'r ddiwyddoedd yn y Nogol, o'r ddweud o'i aethau sylfaenol yn cyfrifio'r ddweud o'r ddweud o'r ddweud o'r llaw, ac mae'n gwneud hynny o'i gweithio'r mewn gwirioneddau, ym mhwyaf. Yn Ymddangodd, mae'r gwirionedd wedi'i gweithio'r hanesaf, rwy'n credu, fel ymddangos o'u cyfrifio, yn 10 o'r 100 o'r holl o'r holl, ychydig yn fwy o'r hyn. Mae'n cyfrifio'r holl o'r holl o'r holl. Ond yw'n cyfrifio'r holl o'r holl o'r holl. yn yma, mae'r bywydio'r bydau yn rhan o'r holl o'r hefyd yn gyfarcheb o gweithio'r cynysgwyr. Mae'r bywydio'r bywyd yn gwirionedd. Mae'n cyfrifio, yn gyfrifio, ac yn amlwg. Mae'n amlwg cynysgwyr, yn gyfrifio, haf deilogio, mae'n rhaid yn gweithio'r cyfrifio. Yn ymddangos y same, mae'r bywydio'n cyfrifio. Yn ei bod nhw'n rhaid y pethau o gyfrifio'r wneud, Smartwch gwaith a wudφ, we know that this seething amounts of molten rock at extraordinary temperatures extraordinary pressures this seething mass is seeking a way out through the Earth crust and eventually a way out is found In the form of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions what do you have the same in society Felly, allwch yn cael hwnnw'n gweithio, fyddai'r hyn yn cael hwnnw, fyddai'n gweithio, fyddai'n gweithio. Allwch yn cael hwnnw, yn y llwythau, yn y brifysgol, yn y Brifysgol, yn y llwythau. Mae'n yn cael hwnnw. Felly, o'n gweithio, yn cael hwnnw'n gweithio, yn allwch gweithio, yn allwch yn gweithio ymlaen i'r llwythau, rwy'n dda wedi gwneud y dynnu, If Donald Trump were to win the election, which he didn't think for a moment would be the case, none of them did. But if Trump wins, I would no longer recognise this country. Well he did win and the fact of the matter is Mrs Clinton, you never recognised that country. You never had any knowledge of that country, not the real America, not the America of millions of unemployed workers and poor people. You've got no knowledge of this, you're in a different planet, as far as most people are concerned. And this is really the cause of your electoral catastrophe. And this needs to be examined a little bit more closely. Now in the same edition of the standard that I just showed you, I was just interested. There's one interesting interview, if I can find it. Yes, here we are. It's an interview with a Trump supporter, a chap with the name of John Fredericks, the chairman of the Virginia Donald Trump for President campaign. And this man says the following, it's quite interesting what he says, I will read it with your permission. He says, this is a working class revolution, he says. Nobody saw it coming, that's true. The elites in the media, eating their cheese and drinking their champagne, never talk to real voters. That's also true, it's true in Britain also incidentally. Working class Americans have been sold down the river by the establishment, by the Wall Street slavery class and Donald Trump is their advocate. Well I could agree with everything in that statement except the last sentence. Donald J Trump of course is not the advocate of the American worker, I'm sorry to tell you. He is of course a property tycoon himself, a billionaire, a very wealthy man. And ultimately he represents the same class, the same class interest as Hillary Clinton. The Republicans and Democrats represent the same class, the bankers and capitalists who are responsible for the problems of ordinary Americans, working class Americans. That was put very well by the great American writer Gore Vidal, who I greatly admire, who said the following. Our republic, the United States, our republic has one party, the property party with two right wings. That's a fact and this is crucial, this explains the alarm felt by the ruling class. That's why they're so concerned about Donald Trump. You see, for generations, for over a century, the solidity of American capitalism, the most important capitalist power on earth, was based upon these two apparently solid political pillars, the Republican Party and the Democrat Party who comfortably had an arrangement that they alternated, they passed power to each other for a period of, for generations actually. Without any fundamental difference, the latest example of course was Obama, don't forget, eight years ago. Obama offered change. He fought an election under the slogan of change and by God there was a reaction from millions of people. Millions of people were energized and had illusions in this. Because, why? Because Americans are desperately seeking a change. They want a change, they demand a change. Now, what change have they received under Obama for the last eight years? Well none at all, nothing that you could notice particularly. And therefore of course the Democrats, Obama was supposed to be a left-wing Democrat if you like, by betraying the hopes of the people, prepared the way for the rise of Donald Trump. There's no argument about this. Now what you will see, not just in America but in every country I would say, is an extreme political instability now. You can see that. Countries that were considered to be stable, Britain was supposed to be the most politically stable country in Europe. Look at the mess they've got now after the Brexit, they're not stable at all. And what you will see in all countries is a whole period of violent swings of public opinion to the left, yes, but also to the right. Also to the right, you see this increase incidentally, I notice that new democracy is rising because of the betrayal of Tsipras. And by the way you have to look at this, the conduct of the reform which prepares the way, always prepares the way for a swing to reaction, a swing to the right. And that was the case with Obama, there's no getting around this. These violent swings to the left and to the right, what do they represent? They represent a desperate search by the masses who are trying to find a way out of this crisis, out of this mess. It's a revolt if you like, an instinctive revolt, what you see in the States, it's like a plebian insurrection. Yes, involving millions of workers, you can't blame the workers for that. Protesting against unemployment, the hopeless position of the factories that have been closed in the so-called Rust Belt, which was once a thriving industrial area, which Trump plays upon, demagogically appeals to these people and you can't criticise them or blame them for responding to that incidentally. Many of these people, I would say most of them would have supported Bernie Sanders, that's the point. They did support Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders was the only one that could have beaten Trump by the way. The answer to these idiots in Britain in the Labour Party, these scoundrels in the parliamentary Labour Party, that say that oh no, the left can't win an election. You know, they can't win an election. Well of course Bernie Sanders could have won in the States. He's the only one that could have beaten Trump. It's a well known fact by the way that many of those that supported Trump would have been prepared to vote for Bernie Sanders, they said so. And the reason was that both Bernie Sanders on the left and Trump on the right represented somehow an attack on the existing establishment. That's the bottom line in this situation. And therefore this will be repeated. Now Trump of course is a right winger, there's no question about that. He's not the champion of the working class, that's just nonsense. And this will be seen in practice. But he has benefited from this enormous feeling of rage, of opposition to the status quo, rejection of the status quo. People are protesting against inequality, unemployment, poverty. And also the cynical rule of a tiny privileged elite of super rich people. Even like dynasty's family, they've run the United States for the last 25 years as if it were their personal private property. Passing power from the Clinton dynasty to the Bush dynasty. This stinks, the whole corrupt system stinks in the nostrils of people and they protest against it. And nobody can blame them for that. Of course Trump does not represent a real change any more than Obama represented a change. Or Clinton would have represented it, that's just nonsense. Because they're all fundamentally rooted in the same class, that's the point. Now it's true that ruling class don't like Trump, they didn't want Trump. First of all because as a person he's a maverick, he's unpredictable, they don't like people like that. They prefer someone firmly under their control, a puppet like Clinton would have been, a puppet. He's a maverick and therefore they don't like that. It's also because of the forces that he's conjured up, the forces that he's appealed with. The millions precisely of workers and dispossessed disenchanted people that are responding. And therefore that's a dangerous thing to do from their point of view. Nevertheless of course they were shocked. They were shocked of course in the Democrats who completely demoralised, I don't doubt it. But also in the Republicans don't forget that the Republican establishment didn't want Trump. At least you give Trump credit for something, he was defiant. He defied the Republican establishment all the way along the line. If Bernie Sanders had a similar firm attitude in relation to the Democrat party, I think we'd be in a different position, we'd be in a strong position. Particularly as Trump will become, I think fairly quickly, he'll become discredited in the eyes of his supporters. The ruling class of course have got a thousand means of controlling politicians like Trump and they will control him. Now on paper Trump is the most powerful man in America. The Republicans, Trump in effect, not only now control the White House, they also control the House of Representatives and the Senate. This is an apparently powerful position. Yes but he's aroused a lot of illusions you see, a lot of hopes. And therefore now he will find out very quickly he's got to deliver. He's got no excuse, can't blame the opposition or blocking of his measures by Congress because he controls Congress or the Republicans control Congress. And therefore he'll be under pressure to carry out things which he cannot deliver on. He can't solve the problems of ruined industries and unemployment and inequality, which are the product of the capitalist system which he supports, he's a fervent supporter. He's a businessman, in effect he's a salesman Donald, a very capable salesman, talented salesman. It's true and he sold the American public, he sold the working class. A beautiful dream, you know. But in reality it's a sody product, he sold them a product which is not fit for purpose. And when people realise that it will take a little time of course. But when they realise that you better look out, it will prepare the way I predict now. It will prepare the way Donald Trump will prepare the way for a colossal shift to the left in the future. There's no question about that. Now you see the international repercussions are also quite interesting. Normally when an American candidate is elected president, they fall over themselves to greet him and to send letters of congratulations and so on. This time I was quite amused. There was a deafening silence from Paris and from Berlin and from Rome. Deafening silence. Only broken by Marie Le Pen, interestingly enough, who sent him a congratulation three hours before the result was announced. That was a clever move. And of course the initial impact of this international will be the strength of the kind of reactionary populist leaders, anti-immigration, the anti-immigration crowd such as Le Pen in France and Kurt Wilders in Holland was also congratulated Donald Trump. And the only other person that congratulated him fairly quickly was Vladimir Putin. They must have run out of vodka in Moscow this morning. They were delighted of course. Because Trump has made noises that he wants to deal with Russia and so on. We will see if that transpires or not. Putin, by the way, made an interesting statement. He's not. He's not a very nice man but he's quite clever in his own narrow way. He said to Washington, he said to the new president, to Trump, we would like a deal with you that defends the interests of both our great nations. Unfortunately of course the interests of Russia and America are not necessarily the same. Therefore it remains to be seen whether they will do a deal or not, it's possible. They might, I don't know. That's Trump's idea. We'll see if it works. Either way you can bet your bottom dollar that the Russians that Putin will take advantage of the present crisis in America because there's a crisis. The confused situation that exists, the contradictions that exist to press his own agenda. The Russians will go on the offensive for the next few months. As we say in English, they'll make, hey, well, the sun shines. That's perfectly clear. Oh, the other person that also sent a message fairly early on, the Germans didn't. Well, Merkel made a very grudging kind of statement, a formal statement of approval. But the German foreign minister was astonished before she'd said a word. Actually told somebody, actually said, it was reported in the press that, what did he say? Oh yes, that this candidate, that Trump, was not the preferred candidate either of the German government or the big majority of the German people, which is true. I think he's got about 5% support in Germany. But it's not the Germans that are left the American pressure. It's the American people, unfortunately, that do that. The other person that rushed to give her support was Theresa May, our dear Tory Prime Minister, who, of course, immediately sent a letter hoping that this would mean a continuation of the special relationship between Britain and America. We know what that is. It's the relationship between the butler and his master. But nevertheless, maintain the special relationship, and I hope, of course, we'll get a trade deal, a least juicy trade deal, as soon as possible, which may or may not materialise. I mean, Trump might be fond of Brexit and fond of the Tories and so on. But as I say, he's a hard-headed businessman, and his slogan is America first, my friends. America first. Protectionism. Any trade deal that he signs, whether it is with Britain or with Timbuktu, will be on the basis of America first, defending American interests. That's to say, the interests of American big business, the bankers and the capitalists, which is basically his interest. Of course, this fact is another subject we don't have time to deal with. But his economic programme, and it's based fundamentally on protectionism and isolationism, of course, that's a threat. That's a serious threat. It's seriously alarmed. The entire bourgeoisie on a world scale, because it's a threat to the entire capitalist world order, which is based on globalization and increased trade between the nations. Protectionism is a direct threat to that, which could, if he persists in this, which he may well persist in it, because it's a tradition in America of this kind of protectionism and isolationism. If he persists in this, it could really bring the whole of the world economic order crashing down. That's the reason for the alarm, because although the governments were very slow in coming forward with the statements on the elections, the markets were not. The markets don't wait for any man or any government. They immediately voted with their feet. In Asia, the stock markets crashed. In Europe, there were serious falls on the stock markets, partially recovered since. And there's been a flight from the stock exchange, from stocks and shares, from investment into safe havens, such as gold. So now's the time to buy gold if you're looking for a good investment. Gold, Japanese yen and the Swiss franc. Those are supposed to be safe havens, which indicates what. It indicates the profound fears of the capitalist for the future, which is the future on a world scale, a stormy future of crisis, of slumps, of wars, of crises, of permanent political crisis and turbulence, of which what you've seen in America is just, if you like, the first act. Somebody said it's the end of a chapter in the States. I say it's the beginning, not just of a chapter, but of a whole volume of crisis on both in America and on a world scale. What you've seen at present time in America is nothing compared to what the future holds. So watch this space.