 Hey, folks. So I think Harvey and Josh said they're not going to come today. Yeah, that was my guess given the security work. So we'll wait a couple more minutes, and then I think there's at least one agenda item. And we can talk about that, but I don't know that this is going to be a super informative meeting today. Fair enough. Are you OK running it? I actually have to duck out early, but I wanted to drop in in case Matt and Harvey could make it. And hopefully you can all hear me OK. Yep. Can you hear me? Yes, we can hear you. Probably critical mess. Is whoever added proxy protocol support on the call? Yeah, I'm here. What are your thoughts? I'm into that. Sure. Hi, I'm Braden. I am a software engineer at DigitalOcean working on product for load balancers as a service. And so we're kind of in the beginnings of the projects to kind of rework some dental and architecture. And so I mean, so essentially this is a customer facing product that is a managed service for L4 and L7 load balancing. And so as kind of part of this investigative work to determine whether we switch to Envoy as kind of like the underlying piece for kind of L4 and L7, we would need to have support for proxy protocol. This is something that our current load balancer support and so I guess I'm kind of curious. It seems like there's kind of a lot of back and forth that has been kind of work done on the upstream side and it seemed like there is interest kind of maybe from the Google aspect. But it looks like some of that may be stale. So just kind of wanting to maybe ask if anyone's maybe aware of work that's being planned or work underway for adding that. And if not, then obviously if we decided to go with Envoy, we would be fine adding that ourselves if that would be something that I guess the project would want or would accept into it, I guess. Yeah, I think I don't know offhand of anyone working on this, but I think it would be like a useful and generically useful thing to add. So I'd say file a GitHub feature request and if you guys are willing to tackle it, then we'll sign it your way. Okay. Has anyone else heard of any work on this front? Yeah, so yeah, I think it'd be totally useful. So if you guys are up for doing it, go for it. Okay, yeah, I think that this work probably wouldn't start till probably until the new year, but I think we probably engage closer to then when that work would be undertaken and probably would, whether it's like a proposal is necessary or like not to design either or went once. Yeah, I would say to start with an issue and then generally what'll happen is if people have concerns about how it might be implemented, I think proxy protocol is pretty straightforward. So I don't think it would be a big deal, but again, there might be tie-ins of other people who want to use it and make it accessible and then they can weigh in, you know, back and forth and make sure that the APIs are clean enough. But I think this one's probably straightforward. So you just open an issue and people would say, like, go for it and then you just give it a shot. All right, perfect. Is that good? Thank you very much. Yeah. Does anyone else have anything they want to talk about while we're here? I will just call out, obviously, there is a security release happening today, which is why we've lost half of the maintainers on the call. They're off, you know, handling the CDs and doing the release process. So that'll land, I believe, in one hour. For anyone who wants to pick that up, if you're running on voice and edge proxy, it's always a good thing to do. And if people, again, have questions of how to get on the early release list, there is documentation of becoming a maintainer or if you run on voice, you know, kind of what the parameters are for getting on that list. I think I heard one other question. Oh, yeah, I was gonna chime in if that's okay. Can you hear me? Yep. Okay, cool. Yeah, I'm Tony. I'm looking to lift student-affected currency work right now. I just wanted to see if anybody would be interested in helping review the docs. Because right now, I think it's just me and Matt and I don't know, it's pretty low bust factor. I just wanted, I didn't want like someone to kind of jump into that currency, take a look at like, you know, a few thousand lines of code and just get confused about what's going on. So yeah, I just wanted to know who I could wrangle in to help review documents, maybe. I think we'll be interested in taking a look at it. Once it's got some more features to it. So I'd be happy to take a look at docs and things as you go along. Okay, cool. Is there, what features were you hoping for, I guess? I think you had somebody chime in. We have somebody who wants to do sort of adaptive concurrency based on error rates. Okay. And it sounded like that was sort of like a, something that would get added later, like once you get the basic thing going. Yeah, yeah, so instead of latency based, you just want like a success rate based. Yeah. Yeah. Cool. Okay. Yeah. I mean, that's it. Also, I just hadn't been at the one's meetings. Welcome back. Thanks. Absolutely. Cool. Anything else? Will we get a journey early? Go in once? Going twice? Okay. See you all in two weeks.