 That's the mantra of analytics is that, hey, it's just a crapshoot. We built for the hundred and sixty two. This is the way we do it. And when we get to the playoffs, sorry, all bets are off. That's a nice little thing to lean on. But it also tells you that all this they've got to change. They've got to go out and get starting pitching. They've got to change the whole the way they do analytics. When you hear that, that tells you no, no, no, this is how we do it. It doesn't mean it's right, though. And I've how many years of them doing it and losing the playoffs before they go, we've got to adjust this. Yeah. But you know what, they're probably never going to because their team exceeds what people expect them to do. I mean, with all the injuries, you should not have won a hundred and three games. And they did. So the analytics work. It just doesn't work in a short series. But that's why you have to adjust. And for people, but you know, change it for the regular season. Yeah. But but you probably can't do both. You know what I mean? Like if you if you're gonna if you're gonna build a team for a short series, you might not get to that short series if it doesn't work on the long haul. I don't think you could serve two masters. I think the best thing that could happen to baseball, at least for the artistic value of baseball, aesthetics, should I say, is if the if the nationals end up winning the World Series, they are not an atlantic team. But we have a scout running it. Why can't that be done already? So the nationals are two wins away from winning the World Series. But let's say the Astros, and this could very easily happen, win the next four games and win the championship. Well, then the nationals way doesn't work. The nationals way eight straight playoff games. They're two wins away from winning a championship. If they get those two wins, then it's Oh, it works. We should change. If they lose in seven, then it doesn't work. And give me a break. You're right. It's it's such a thin line, whether or not it works. And it does work during the regular season and teams will say if we get to the postseason, it's a pretty good season. I understand that. But what Peter is saying is that, yeah, do the analytics over 162. That's right. But when you get to a best of five, when you get to a best of seven, maybe you make some tweaks to it. Yeah, but here's what I'm saying. I know what you're both saying, but it's hard to do that because you don't have the personnel to tweak it. You have an analytics based personnel. You don't have guys that could run and bunt and stuff like that. So it's different. No, you want to deviate from like third time through the order, let your eyes tell the story with a picture that I understand. Well, that is the nationals you watch and they're bunting, they're sacrificing. And I read a story to Adam Eaton, the right fielder that Davy Martinez, their manager told them in spring training, I don't want you striking out. Nothing good comes from strikeouts. I want you to put the ball in play. That's anti analytics. Mostly there. And the Astros are the same way, even though they're very much analytic, maybe as analytic a team is in baseball, but they still figured out that I don't want you to strike out. And the nationals don't want you to strike out. And here are the two best teams in baseball deciding who the champion. I think because the nationals were able to serve two masters, they have guys that hit home runs and don't have to strike out 200 times. That's the one change I'd want the Yankees to make. You can have 600 strikeouts in the three, four or two, three and four spots in the order. It's too many. It's too many and it does show and rear its ugly head in the postseason. It does.