 18. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I think I'll be having to repeat that second meeting for you. The central theme in all of those meetings was how we could work together to achieve a just and lasting peace in the Middle East. We've been working closely with King Hussein to bring Jordan and hopefully the Palestinians into direct negotiations with Israel. And despite the recent bombing and hijacking incidents, we continue to believe that the opportunity for peace is still there and it must be exploited before it slips from our grasp. Hussein's efforts have already created enormous risks for him personally as well as for Jordan. He needs the visible public commitment of U.S. support, both military and political, signaled by the sale of U.S. defensive arms in order to withstand the pressure from Syria and radical Arab groups into continuing the next stages of the peace process. The United States remains firmly committed to supporting Israel's security. In the long run, however, that security will always be in danger unless and until we can help both sides achieve a peaceful resolution of this conflict. And the road ahead is immensely difficult and will require imagination, courage and flexibility from all the parties. Our aim is to help create conditions which will lead to a lasting Middle East peace. And I'm fully committed to that goal and so is the entire administration. Our intent, the Strategic Defense Initiative, our brightest hope for a more secure future is to find a way to move to an increased reliance on defensive systems that destroy weapons rather than threaten people. And our immediate goal is to neutralize the threat of offensive ballistic nuclear missiles. Eventually we hope to make them obsolete. Now, we seek a way to make deterrence of war more stable and enduring if we must compete. Why not compete to keep the peace rather than compete to build weapons whose only use is to destroy us and our civilizations? Finally, I want to emphasize that the United States did not invent the concept of strategic defense. The Soviet Union has long had a vigorous program of both research and development in this area. Rather than detailing their program here, I'd commend to you a publication that is recently released by the State and Defense Departments on Soviet strategic defense programs, and that is its title. It'll be enlightening reading and it's available, no charge. But before I have to leave, I want to ask for your active support for our efforts, your views and opinions are important and I know that I can count on you for that. But we're having problems up in the Congress with both of these, but particularly with the Jordan arms sale. And they need to be encouraged. King Hussein has really, he has been a tremendously strong man. And I don't think he has beguiled any more by Arafat and the Palestinians that he's received some eye-openers in the last several weeks himself. And I know that Perez is ready, as he made plain to us, to go into negotiations immediately. But Hussein is the one who's threatened from behind by the position that he's taken and that has become more evident in these last few days with these recent incidents. And this effort to prevent us from meeting some of his safety requirements must not be allowed to succeed. I think it will, I think it's the honorable thing to do. We should do it and I think it keeps him in the peace process and makes, well, for example, by the time that we could get the weapons to him, I believe that he will already be in negotiations with regard to peace and then that will prove our conviction about this because those weapons aren't like a package from the supermarket, they're not going to be delivered day after tomorrow if the Congress votes out. We can use your help. We've got it. Well, I see you've got me scheduled to move on here. Thank you so much for the discussion. Thank you so much. I had a saying I've made and maybe some of you've heard me say it before then with regard to your contacts with the Congress, it isn't necessary to make them see the light, just feel the heat. Are you going to be in peace? I'm going to be in peace. President Nancy, I'm sure you know the purpose of the meeting. After about two years and it seems longer, Martin Anderson and myself have both pretty well settled on sites for the Reagan presidential librarians, for the Reagan Senate, for public affairs. And after interviewing, it seems like it's a little bit of an architect's why we have, I'll say it's a recommendation. Martin will explain the complexities of it to you. My recommendation on an architect, which is actually two architects. Now the sites that you know, I'll just briefly say that the site for the presidential library is where we all are at Stanford is really the best site at Stanford University. How they passed that over for so many years because it's definitely the old magnificent view of both the Bay and the mountain range. And the site for the Senate for public affairs, the fellow by the name of Ronald Reagan was Governor even though Pat Brown took credit for that for it. And it's just past Foothill College, it's a magnificent site. What it is, is the old Marino Missionary Center. They have 30 acres at Martin's.