 Sonoma to Shelter in Place to minimize the spread of COVID-19. The planning commissioners will be conducting today's meeting in a virtual setting using Zoom webinar. Commissioners and staff are participating from remote locations and or practicing appropriate social distancing. Members of the public may view and listen to the meeting as noted on the city's website and as noted on the agenda for today's meetings. Members of the public wishing to speak. During item four, the public comment portion or during our public hearing today will be able to do so by raising their hand and will be given the ability to address the commission. Can we please ask for roll call? Yes. Let the record reflect that all commissioners are present with the exception of Commissioner Carter. Thank you. Item two is approval of minutes. There aren't any minutes today, so we'll move on to item three, public comments. I will now put the public comment for any item. I'm sorry. Oh, no, I missed something. No, no, not at all. I apologize. I was just going to give the instructions for participation. Oh, that's okay. If you wish to make a comment via Zoom, please raise your hand. If you are dialing in via telephone, please press star nine and star six to unmute yourself once called upon. And we do have public comment, caller three, six, six, two. You have been given permission to speak. If you would please introduce yourself for the record. Yeah, can you hear me okay? We can. If you would provide your name for the record, please. Yes, William Pinkerton. I'm a property owner and stream side. If this, if this comment has to do with the agenda item under the public hearing, please wait until that item. Or is this something more than one item right now? This is on items that are not on the agenda tonight. Okay. So this has nothing to do with Jane dispensary. Not yet. That's further on in the agenda tonight. So we have to stay on for the whole thing and until you get to it. Okay. Okay. Yes. Yes. And there's only one item on the agenda tonight. So it shouldn't be much longer. Okay. My apologies. That's okay. Okay. I don't see any other hands raised. So. If that's the case, I will go ahead and close the public comment period. And we'll move on to planning commissioners reports. The statement of purpose for the planning commission is. The planning and zoning laws in the city of Santa Rosa duties include implementing of plans ordinances and policies related to land use matters, assisting in writing and implementing the general plan and area plans, holding public hearings and acting on proposed changes to the zoning code, zoning map, general plan, tentative subdivision maps and undertaking any special planning studies as needed. So with that, are there any committee reports? I don't see any. So we'll move on to 4.3 commission reports. Are there any reports from my fellow commissioners tonight? Okay. Not seeing any. Then we'll move right on to department reports. Ms. Jones. Yes. Thank you. With the commission. I will be brief. I'm getting a little feedback. So I apologize. I'm sure that is. I just wanted to just quickly let the commission know that. I just wanted to say that I'm here in, in place of Claire Hartman tonight. She's your normal staff liaison, but she and several of our other planners are headed to San Francisco right now to accept an award from the Northern California chapter of the American planning association. For the downtown stationary specific plan that was recently adopted by council. So we're very excited about that. So I just wanted to share that with the commission. I'm just, you're going to be meeting her momentarily, but I did want to let you know that tonight is the debut of one of our recent hires, one of our new city planners. As I mentioned to the commission several months ago, we were in the process of hiring several new city planners. And so Suzanne Hartman is one of them. We are extremely excited to have her on board with the city. She, she's only been with us a short while, but she's already shown herself to be a rock star among planner. So we're excited to have her here. And I'm excited to have her meet you tonight. So that's all I have. Great. Thank you. So with that, we'll move on to item six, statement of abstentions. Are there any abstentions tonight? Okay. Seeing none. And that we have no consent items. So we'll move on to our scheduled item tonight. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. This is item eight point one. Public hearing Jane dispensary conditional use permit. 4040 highway 12. Conditional use permit 21 dash zero seven one. This is an exparte item. So we'll go ahead and start with. Commissioner Cisco. I visited the site and I have no new information to disclose. Thank you. Commissioner Duggan. I visited the site and have no additional information. Commissioner Holton. I visited the site and have nothing further disclose. Thank you. And Michelle Krupke. I visited site. I have no other information disclose. Thanks. Vice chair Peterson. I have no information to disclose. Thanks. And I also visited the site and have no additional information to disclose. So with that, we'll move on to our scheduled item today. Thank you. Thank you for your debut. Thank you. Take it away. Thank you. And good evening. It's your weeks and members of the planning commission. It is great to be here. And I'm sure it's a first of many. Projects. I am presenting. The. Project item for Jane dispensary. Let me go ahead and. Can you see my screen? Great. Let me just present. All right. So I'm presenting today's item Jane dispensary, which is a conditional use permits. File number. Two. One dash zero one seven one. And the proposed project site is located at four zero four zero highway 12. Alternatively known as Sonoma highway. The proposed. Use is to operate a cannabis retail facility with delivery service within an existing commercial building. And the applicant proposes to operate the retail dispensary between the hours of nine a.m. and nine p.m. seven days a week. The project site is located. I'm sorry about that. The project history, the applicant submitted a major conditional use permit review application on August 18th of last year. And then shortly thereafter there was a neighborhood meeting. That was held to discuss the proposed project and several neighbors participated in the meeting and voice their concerns. About the retail facility. And specifically its location. Because it surrounds a lot of residential districts. And I would like to just note here that even though there is no required setback from residential zones, there is a 600 foot minimum setback from any school. As well as any other permitted cannabis retail facilities. And this proposed site is in compliance with the location requirements. So the project location is in the northeastern quadrant of the city. And it is on a corner lot with frontage on highway 12 and stream side drive. The proposed space used to be occupied by a for a pet shop and there are two other operating businesses within this commercial building. The proposed site is located within the neighborhood commercial zoning district, which is consistent with the designated general plan use, retail and business services. The surrounding zoning districts include office commercial and mobile home park to the north. And then meeting residential to the east, south and west. This is the proposed site plan. And I just want to note here that as of right now, the lot has a total of 36 parking spaces. And that includes two ADA parking spaces. This is the current floor plan. Oops, sorry. And this is the proposed floor plan. The, as you are aware, the city code requires cannabis retail facilities to comply with specific operational requirements, pertaining to on site security, auto control, lighting and noise. The city code has provided detailed plans and. Reports for all of those operational requirements. And after reviewing those. Proposed plans and the entirety of the application staff was able to make the following findings for the proposed project listed here. This is a current photo of the site. This is the proposed storefront. And there are some proposed exterior modifications, including new signage and windows, but they are considered minor and they are subject only to director level review and approval. Based on the size of the, I know that says a lot. So please mind my typo there. That is meant to say floor area instead of a lot. Due to the size of floor area. The required parking spaces would be eight vehicle parking spaces and one bicycle space, which it is in compliance with because the total lot, the entire lot features 36 vehicle parking spaces. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California environmental quality act. And qualifies for the following three. And the final three. The first one is the category. Categorical exemptions. There is class one, which is existing facilities. Class three, which is the conversion of an existing structure from one use to another. And class 32 infill development projects. And in conclusion, the planning and economic development department recommends that the planning commission by resolution approve a conditional use permit to allow for the proposed cannabis retail dispensary facility to be reviewed for the next five years. And then we will be able to review that. And then we will be able to review that. And then we will be able to review that. And so that is the category number four zero four zero highway 12. And this is my contact information. If you have any questions or comments, I will also allow. Or have you meets the applicant who was on now, who will also be getting a small oral presentation. Thank you, Ms. Hartman. Are there any questions of Ms. Hartman. To introduce our. Applicants. His name is Mario Timo. Hello, can everybody hear me? Yes, we can. Thank you. I apologize. I had a little bit of technical difficulties getting. Getting on the call here, but I'm, but I'm here now. And I believe that we also have. My two partners on the, on the line, Jamie Shira and Leanne Baker. Is that true? Yes, I see Jamie Shira and. And Leanne too. Yes, I do. Hi, Jamie Shira here. Now can you hear me? Yes. Yeah. Can you hear me? Yes, we can. Oh, I think there was a delay. Hi, Jamie Shira. So my name is Mario Timo. I am the, the name on the applicant. We, you know, our company is. Is laser focused on retail dispensaries. We have one already open here in, in, in Santa Rosa and more coming. And we're excited about this, this particular low location. I'm happy to. To answer any questions. I actually, you know, we, when we, when we had our first public input hearing, this is probably. This is, this is probably six, six months ago or so. We did put together a slideshow and a document that, you know, that outlines sort of the, you know, the company mission in, in this case, I'm happy to, you know, we're happy to talk to, you know, to talk about that, but we actually didn't, didn't want to overwhelm you with a big slide show or anything like that. We just wanted to sort of meet everybody and, and tell you all what we're up to and feel any questions if, if you have them. Jamie Shira is. An owner in the company and is, has the most experience of in, in the industry out of, out of all of us. She was a founding member of the, one of the very first legal, obviously dispensaries that, that began creating a brand name for themselves. And this was happening in, in San Francisco in, in around 10 years ago. Hopefully I'd actually like her to speak a little bit to her, her knowledge of the industry and, and sort of what's, what's brought her here. And then I'd like Leanne to talk a little bit about just, Leanne is the, is the, is the COO of the company. And, you know, operations is a, is a gigantic part of, of what makes these things go because they're very, very regulated and, and everything needs to be perfectly by the book. So if she could just touch on the operations side, that'd be great. And, and we're happy to feel it, feel any questions you, you have. Jamie, do you mind talking a bit about, about the industry, Jamie? Hi, no, I don't at all. Thank you, Mario. Jamie Shira here. I have been in cannabis since 2010, as Mario said, started my career in San Francisco, always lived in Santa Rosa and commuted to San Francisco. So spent a lot of time on the road. I lost my house in the tubs fire. So I had to relocate and pause my cannabis work. Then I've now relocated in Healdsburg, but excited to work in cannabis in Sonoma County. But so to speak to what I've seen in the cannabis industry and what's been successful is creating a safe environment where people feel comfortable talking about exploring this product as a medicine or for their, you know, mental or physical well-being, however they are, are seeking it, but specifically feeling like they're not doing something wrong. They're comfortable. They're safe. And what's worked in my previous career is really bringing a level of education and sophistication to this offering. So speaking about it in a, in a way in which we're respecting the medicine or we're respecting its use and the different, the different forms that people are really exploring it for. So really being adaptive or just being understanding to how people are trying to apply it to their life and what they're seeking out of it and understanding our consumers needs. And specifically for Jane, it's this forthcoming consumer, someone who's who hasn't explored cannabis previously, but maybe their doctor saying it's a good alternative or hey, you take a prescription that helps you, you know, helps this part of your life and maybe you need something to help with sleep or, you know, the non-traditional methods like the tinctures or other forms that people aren't as familiar with. So having products that suit those needs and in an environment that feels good and comfortable for them to do so. That's really been our kind of successful formula that we've been able to bring to market and get the appropriate audience for. And Jamie, Jamie really was one of the, one of the very first out, out the gate to create a brand in the industry and formalize it and know what's important to members of the community. What's, what is what she and we have with her help have curated is a very, very large array of products that, that, that we feel really, really service the, service the community, you know, in a way we, you know, we have, we have a lot of really, really good feedback on our selections and, you know, what we carry, we listen to the, we listen to the community and try to try to make the shelves reflective of that. So, Leanne, you can, you can touch a little bit, a little bit on, on operations, if you, if you wouldn't mind. Okay, okay. So, yeah, as you all know, the cannabis industry is highly regulated and it is a challenge to navigate those waters every day. I think we're doing a good job at multiple, at both of our stores that are, that are operating now. We do have something that's very special and as Jamie touched on, you know, bringing education and making people feel welcome and included and as well as getting the right dosage, getting the right medicine, getting the right feeling, you know, when they're, when, if they do have anxiety, then this is a good way for many people to, to navigate those waters. Operating in a medical market, we do see a lot of that. And it, you know, people that truly do have these, these issues that we, we like to make sure that they understand exactly what they're getting and they're getting the right product. It's very important to us. Yeah. We do, we do have a medical license as well. And we own, we actually own a dispensary in St. Louis, Missouri that's under a medical framework. So we have a lot of experience in operating in, in that framework and also the, the medical and recreational use, which obviously California, California is. I don't, I know you guys, your guys, this time is valuable. You, you hear a lot of these, you hear a million things all the time about what's going on in the community. So, you know, I don't, we don't, we want to, we want to answer any questions, you know, pointed questions that you have and, and, you know, we're happy to do so. Thank you. Are there any questions of the applicant from my fellow commissioners? Okay. Then seeing none, we'll go ahead and open the public hearing on this item. If you wish to make a comment via zoom, you select the raised hand button. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. Each speaker has three minutes. You see the countdown timer on your screen. Please make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so. And your microphone will be muted at the end of the countdown. Chair weeks. I see no hands raised at this time. Oh, I apologize. We do have a caller, caller. 3500. You have been given permission to speak. If you would please introduce yourself for the record and then provide your comment. Good afternoon, everybody. Can you, can you hear me? Yes, we can. Thanks. All right. I appreciate the time today. My name is Bill Vreeland. I'm a resident on kentire road, right behind the proposed project. I don't think anybody doubts the, you know, the business as far as what they do and the fact that it probably fits in the area in which it's zoned. I think all the property owners, well, I can't speak for everybody, but we understand that there's a commercial component in the neighborhood in which we live. I think the underlying factor here, there's several reasons that we're concerned. And, and, you know, just to start, I think one of the biggest things that, you know, after the months have gone by, we look at it. The reason is that they don't allow dispensaries go near schools. I know there's a 600 foot setback requirement, which this location meets. So I think while the project adheres to the letter of the law, it might not adhere to the spirit. And what I mean by that is, is we're budding up right against the residential neighborhood where there's families, children, and et cetera. So I would question the location more than anything else. I know that there are several dispensaries in Santa Rosa. I would ask the commissioners, how many do we need? You know, that might not be the right question for this conversation, but, you know, I know that there are four within two miles of this location and six within three miles and a total of 13 in Santa Rosa. I admire Mario, Jamie, and Leanne for, you know, taking over the world one dispensary at a time. I'm in business myself. I don't dispute that fact. The reality is I just would prefer it not to be in my backyard. Other concerns as well would be potential devaluation and property value from perceived whether real or not, but, you know, causing our properties to devalue, parking in congestion, hours of operation, nine o'clock at night on a Sunday in a residential neighborhood. So there's several things there that make my family concerned about putting in a dispensary in our neighborhood. I appreciate the time. I hope the commissioners would decide or consider here if they are favoring fostering business concerns over the concerns of their residents, which I hope you will hear from others in our neighborhood that share a similar opinion. Thank you. Thank you. I see another hand raised. Yes. Caller 3662, you have been given permission to speak if you would share your name for the record before providing your comments. Yeah, I share many of the same concerns just voiced. Pardon me, sir. How many is too many? Can you please state your name for the record? Yeah, William Pinkerton. I'm a property owner on the stream side. And I am a capitalist. And so I don't have any qualms with what the applicant is trying to do. Like the previous caller, I just think that the location is not proper. In addition to what he cited. You also have a big homeless population. Any of them congregate around the creek area. And it's going to be a magnet for these homeless to stay over in this area more, perhaps come into the residential areas and do their thing. And so in addition, being on highway 12. That's a very good exit. To get out of town. And so in my viewpoint, you're inviting crime. So. Those are the reasons and I think it's unconscionable. That the applicant. As well as. Did we lose him? Collar. I'm here. Anyway, I was saying, I find it unconscionable that the applicant as well as this committee would allow this type of business to be open at nine o'clock at night. It just, I can't even put it together as to the common sense of that. So I'm not against them having a location. In a more commercial area. And to have as many dispensaries. I'm not against them having a location. In Sonoma County. I don't think they need anymore in Sonoma or in Santa Rosa per se, but. As far as this location, I'm dead set against it. And I'm very, very upset. That they would even consider the operating hours. Of nine to nine. I think that's an outrage. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next color is Leanne Baker. I just wanted to touch on what the last two colors have said that. Excuse me, Ms. Baker. Ms. Crocker, can you weigh in on an applicant responding to comments in the public comment period? I just want to make sure we're following all the rules. Yes. Thank you. We need to allow the public comment period to continue. If and when there are no additional comments, you can then close the public comment period. And at that time you can ask staff to respond to any of the comments. And staff can also ask for input from the applicant. And then we can continue from there. Okay. Thank you. I'm sorry about that. Thank you so much. So. Are there any other public. Comments. We have no additional hands raised at this time. Great. Thank you. So with that, I will go ahead and close the public. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Hearing on this portion and bring it back to the commission. We heard. From comments from two neighbors. One was concerned about the location and another was concerned. Also about location and inviting crime and the hours. So. Ms. Hartman, can you talk about the hours? Yes, I can. We're going to continue from the commission. And then the converse of the program. The co site will be from. Nine a.m. To nine p.m. So it will be. Closed by nine p.m. Just to. Some of what the concern was for one of those. Comments. And are those. Hours consistent with the. Comprehensive cannabis ordinance. Yes. Yes. The, the code says. days a week. Thank you. Um, any other questions from my fellow commissioners, uh, commissioners? Um, Miss Harman, could you also just sort of address the concern that the public has of how many or too many, like how is Santa Rosa, um, mapping these out just so that that question gets answered? Um, yes, we do have an updated map that shows, um, the locations of permitted dispensaries. Um, I'm not sure if Jess or Director Jess, um, or anyone on the, also on the line has, um, any further clarification about how the city is going about mapping the dispensaries? Sure. Yeah, I can, I can jump in here. Thanks, um, Suzanne. So yes, as mentioned, we do map these and with every application, um, as was mentioned in, um, the presentation also included in your packet, um, part of staff's, uh, review of a project is to determine whether a project is, uh, within, uh, or what distance they are within another similar use to make sure that we don't, um, have a problem with the concentration requirements that are outlined in the code. So for this project, um, it is not located, um, within the, uh, I think it's 600 feet from another location. Um, but beyond that, the city does not limit the number of cannabis, um, uh, retail locations within the city. Thank you. Uh, other questions of staff, uh, Vice Chair Peterson. Uh, if, if you've got it handy, what are the operating hours for, uh, liquor stores under a CUP or similar? I do not have that, um, on me at the moment. Here comes Miss Jones. Yes. Yeah. So, um, I'm going to see if I can pull this up real quickly, but, um, I don't believe that the city limits the hours of operation for alcohol permits. We do have, generally speaking, uh, um, um, trying to think of the term that's used, but we have longer hours or extended hours, um, that is permitted, um, in our commercial zoning districts. And I believe in our, our industrial zoning districts also for any, uh, any retail type use, where if they go beyond a certain time, and again, I'm going to try and pull this up quickly. Uh, if they go beyond a certain time, they need to, uh, obtain a minor use permit. Um, and let me see if I can find this real quick. Uh, let's see, for extended hours, um, gosh, thought I could come up with it quickly. Um, so if you, if you give me a moment, I can look that up, but generally speaking, um, hours are not limited, but if they go beyond a certain time in the evening or start, um, at a certain time in the morning, um, it requires a minor use permit. Thank you. Uh, any other questions at this time? I can share a crap key. Sorry to harp on the time thing. Um, but, uh, Planner Herman or deputy, uh, director Jones, can you correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the hours of operation are, are, um, held within the CUP. So if they say we want to be open from five or from noon to five PM, and that's in the application. And then later on, they want to alter that to seven PM. They'd have to start a whole process in order to do that. Is that correct? Yes. That would be correct. If they're going to modify, if they, if they want to modify any conditions of approval, um, using that one as an example, um, yes, they would need to go back, uh, to the review authority, uh, to request a change in those conditions. Okay. So basically if going from nine to nine, which is allowed by the ordinance allows them to have any operating hours they wish within the ordinance's restrictions, correct? Correct. Thank you. Any other questions at this time? Okay. So with that, um, if somebody with this item has one resolution, if somebody would like to move the resolution for discussion, Commissioner Cisco, do you want to see if Ms Baker wanted to have a response to Okay. Thank you. Uh, no, we're all good. Thank you. Okay. Thank you for circling back. Commissioner Cisco. Uh, so is there someone who would like to, uh, read the resolution for, so we can discuss the project Vice Chair Peterson? Uh, I'll do it. The, uh, I moved the resolution of the planning commission of the city of Santa Rosa, making findings and determinations and approving a conditional use permit for Jane dispensary to allow 1,997 square feet of cannabis retail dispensary with delivery located at 4040 highway 12 file number CUP 21-0771. Uh, neighborhood meeting was conducted on November 22nd, 2021, and waive for the reading. Thank you. Is there a second? Uh, Commissioner Krepke. So that was moved by Vice Chair Peterson seconded by Commissioner Krepke. Um, so with that, let's go ahead and start discussion. So we'll start with, uh, Commissioner Cisco tonight. Um, this is yet another very tight application. Um, well put together in terms of, uh, helping us see that this project meets all of the findings included in the conditional use permit. And I just wanted to say just a little bit more about the concern about being close to residential and, um, the fact that that's part of the city's goals is to make sure that these are, you know, sprinkled throughout the city, uh, increase the walkability. And so having them, you know, close to residential with all of these conditions in place for noise odor, all of that, um, so that it's, it's walkable and, um, easy to access in a variety of different neighborhoods throughout the city. So, uh, with that being said, um, I can make all of the findings for this particular project and we'll be voting for it. Thank you. Uh, Commissioner Deggan. Um, I too can make all the required findings for the project. And I think, um, you know, this location is on a major commercial thoroughfare. It's got access from Highway 12. Um, the clients don't have to go through the residential neighborhood to access the property. So I think it's actually a good site. And I think the neighbors will find out with the enhanced security that's required, uh, by our ordinance that they're not going to have a problem with, um, homeless individuals or people, um, hanging around the parking lot because that's not allowed. So I'm in, um, in favor of the project. Thank you. And Commissioner Holton. I can also make all the required findings and also be in support of this conditional use permit. You know, and, and of course, Commissioner Deggan takes my point again. No, it's, it's the same thing that we hear time and time again, the concern from residents about regarding safety and actually studies have been done to show that it actually makes the neighborhood safer. So you're going to find that it's not really necessarily a bad thing. And in regard to hours of operations, I know at several liquor stores in Santa Rosa where they're open until 11, 12 o'clock at night that are located directly across the street from a residential house. So, you know, and that didn't really, you know, have any real major impact. So I hope to, I hope some of this mitigated some of your concerns. But, uh, thank you very much. I'll also be in support of this project. Thank you, Commissioner Krapke. Yeah, I don't really have anything else to add to what my fellow commissioners have already said. I agree with just about all of it. So I'll just say that I can make all the required findings and will be in support of the application. Thank you, Vice Chair Peterson. My fellow commissioners made, you know, several of the points I was planning on making. But while we've got the public here, I mean, I think we get used to it. It's been a few years of us seeing these conditionally used permits. But, you know, every time it goes into a neighborhood, that's your neighborhood. And I think it's important to kind of speak behind the curtain and maybe discuss what sort of we see. So speaking for myself, you know, I don't see at this point a big distinction between alcohol and cannabis. And if we're going to allow one to operate legally, I think it just makes sense. And what the city decided after several years of discussion and public input was, was that they, they agreed with legalizing it and allowing it to operate as retail sales within the city. And, you know, I don't remember the specific discussion, but they did not sit a cap on the number of dispensaries. And I think the idea was, you know, one to disperse them throughout the city so that, you know, there's not a red light district kind of of cannabis. Any, you know, any one neighborhood in Santa Rosa is bearing a disproportionate burden, but also to kind of let, you know, the market decide on, you know, how much cannabis sales can this area support. So I think that's kind of the reasoning there that that Commissioner Cisco touched on. In terms of, again, we've heard it before, the security concerns, the homelessness issues, you know, I walk this trail frequently, I'm very familiar with, with what's going on there. And having more eyes, having a security plan, having monitors cameras does in fact, you know, despite maybe the historic reputation of cannabis, make the area safer, more eyes, you know, more people paying attention makes it safer for everybody. And again, I agree with Christopher Holton. To my knowledge, there's been no incidents we haven't seen, at least we haven't heard anything from Santa Rosa PD or anybody that there's been issues with this. So, so I'm optimistic that there'll be a good neighbor. And for the other concerns, I mean, this is a conditional use permit. So they have to meet the conditions of the permit to keep operating. And that includes things like odor, you can't detect, you know, the odor of cannabis outside the building, you know, they've got to have the security plan. And it's not forever. You know, it's only for two years. And I think with a second location, I think the applicant has a lot of incentive to be a good neighbor. So for those reasons, I can make the findings in the resolution and we'll be voting in favor of this. Thank you. I also am in favor of the project and can make all the required findings. It's a very comprehensive application. As been said before, we've been seeing these now for a few years. We hear the same concerns from every neighborhood. One of our roles as planning commission is to implement the policies of the city council and their policy is having cannabis dispensaries in neighborhoods, as Commissioner Cisco said. So with that, we'll go ahead and call for vote, please. Thank you. Commissioner Cisco? Aye. Commissioner Duggan? Aye. Commissioner Holton? Aye. Commissioner O'Crepkey? Aye. Vice Chair Peterson? Aye. Chair Weeks? Aye. So that passes with six ayes. Please note that this action is final unless an appeal is filed within 10 calendar days of today's action. The time limit will extend to the following business day if the last day falls on a day that the city is closed. For information on how to submit an appeal form, please contact the project planner. So with that, unless staff has anything else they'd like to convey tonight, we will go ahead and adjourn the meeting until our next scheduled planning commission meeting. Thank you all. Thank you.