 नमश्कार यूस्क्लिक्त में आपलों का स्वागत है और आप देख रहे हैं हमलों का खास कारेक्रम इतिहास के पनने मेरी नजर से कुछ दिन पहले प्रदान मंत्री नरेंदर मुदी ने अपने मासिक रेडियो कारेक्रम मन की बात में भूद्पुर्व और दिवंगत प्रदान मंत्री पीवी नर्सिमा राव को याद किया था सैयोग से 28 जुम जिस दिन ये कारेक्रम ब्रोट्खास्त हुए ता नर्सिमा राव की जन्म शताभ दीवाश की शुर्वात का दिन ता उनका जनम उनने सो इक्किस में हुए ता मोदी जीने नर्सिमा राव की बहुत तारीव की कि वे अनेक भाशाये जानतेते बच्पन से ही नैश्लिस्म की भावनाव से प्रेरिथ ते अपने यूथ में स्वतन्त्रता आन्दोलन में शामिल हो गए ते वगेरा वगेरा इस्तरे की बातें उनके बारे में की हमारे प्रदान मंत्री आसे तुस्रे दलों के निताव की तारीव आमूमन नहीं करते है खास सोर से अगर वो पहले कभी प्रदान मंत्री रहे कों जवाहार लाल मेहरु, इंदिरा गान्दी, मन्मोहन सीं किसी के बारे में कोई खास बात कभी नहीं की क्रिटिसाइस जरूर किया, आस सो से नहींरुको और मन्मोहन सीं को, जिनका नाम लेकर, तो एक तरे से 2014 के पहले पुरा कैंपें रचा गया ताब सवाल यह उपता है, कि नरसिम्मा राउ के बारे में इतना पोजितगली क्यो बोले मुदिजी इसवक्त बात दरसल सिंपल है, एसा माना जाता है, कि नरसिम्मा राउ जब प्रदान मंत्री थे, तो उनके रिष्ते सोन्या गान्दी से अच्छे नहीं ते राउ के सात्फी मानते है, कि सोन्या गान्दी हलके वे उसमः राजनिती में अक्तिब नहीं फिर भी वो एकस्पक्त करती थी, कि नरसिम्मा राउ उनके पास आएंगे, और उनको कंसर्ट करेंगे सोन्या गान्दी या फिर कोंग्रेस के बाखी नेता अफकोस इस बात को नहीं मानते है, वो कहते है, कि 1997 और 1998 के पहले उनको राजनिती में कोई रुची ही नहीं ती पता नहीं, क्या सहीं, क्या गलत, परंतु नरसिम्मा राउ के, कोलिटिकल साइट लैनिंग का प्रोसिस, 1996 के लोग सबा चुनावी फार के बाद हुधा, जब कोंग्रेस की सबता दुबारा पावर में नहीं आए, 1998 में सुन्या गान्दी कोंग्रेस की अद्यक्ष बनने के बाद, जो कोलिटिकल साइट लैनिंग की में बाद कर राउ की मैं बाद कर राउ, उस प्रोसिस में और तेजी अप फाइनालीती आदे, 2004 दिसम्पर में नरसिम्मा राउग का दिहांत हुधा, उस समें, कोंग्रेस सेंटर में सक्ता में ती उपी की सरकार तुस्रे पाटिस के साथ कोलिटिन बना चुकी, नरसिम्मा राउ के परिवार को ये सजस्ट की आगया था, कि उनका अंतिम संसकार हाईद्रा बाद में की आजाए, जैसे की हुध, तो जाहिर है, कि, नरसिम्मा राउ और दस जन्पत के बीच में रिष्ते टीक नहीं, उस सिच्वेशन में अभी भी कोई खाज प्यर बडल नहीं कि रहा है, एक पुरानी कहवत है, तो अगर कोंग्रेस के नेता ये अपोचुनिती देते है, नरसिम्मा राउ के मेंवरी को लाएव नहीं रखकर, उनकी तारीफ नहीं करकर, तो मोदी जी को एक अपोचुनिती दिखाई देती है, अपनी पुलिटिक्स को प्लेए करनें. आसे आज हिंदूस्चान में कमी नहीं असे लोगो की, नरसिम्मा राउ को वैलराईस करते है, उनकी हीरो वर्षिक करते है। चीन के साथ जो सिच्वेशन है, ये अगर नहीं होता, तो आज हम विंदुस्धान में सुन्दे रहे होते, की नरसिम्मा राउ वोस भी देंज्याउ पिं अपिन अपिन अपिन्गा, उनको एकनोमिक रिफाम्स का हीरो माना जाता है, अर्टी टेक्त माना जाता है। ये कहा जाता है की, नरसिम्मा राउ अगर नहीं होते, बहारतिय अर्थवेवस्ता अबही भी लिसिंस भोटा राज में कैध होती, अर्थिक उदारिकरन या फिर एकनोमिक लिब्रिलाईसेशन से, बहारत्त के जन मानस या फिर वरकिंख्लास के जिन्दगी पर, बहुत नेगेटिव असर्द हूँए, इसके बारे में हम अभी बात करेंगे। लेकिन उस से पहले, क्या इस में कोई डाउट है, इस में कोई डाउट है की बहारत्त के पोस्ट एमरजंसी के इतिहास में जो तो सबसे बड़े खाले दबभे है, वो दीरेक्ली नर्सिमा राव के रेस्पोंसिबलीटी में थे। जी हा, मैं सबसे बहले तो, 1984 में आंटी सिख राइच, और फिर उसके बाद, दिसमबर 1992 में बाभरी मजजत के देमौलेशन के बाद की जो खटनाय है, उसकी बाद कर राव. पहना बलाक चाप्टर, 1984 में इंदिरा गान्दी की रत्या के बाद, जो सिखों के खिलाब जो तारगेटेड वायलिन्स वो आता, दिल्ली, कान्पृर, भोकारो, अगर की शहरु में यहां तकी कोईमबतूर में भी वो अता, उस समय भारत का ग्रें मंत्री या होम मिनिस्र कों ता, नर्सिमा राव. तो क्या राजीव गान्दी को अकेला बलेम करना थीक होगा, वो तो ज्मा-ज्मा दो दिन पहले ही बद्भाम मिने भने थे, उनो ने क्यो नहीं यें डियरेक्शन् थीके, मधले नर्सिमा राव ने क्यो नहीं टियरेक्शन् जीब है, दिल्ली पूडेस को अत बाकी स्दीक गब मिनज को, कोई वायलेंस नहीं हूना चाही है अखिर का, चंद्र शेखर की जो सरकार थी को मात्र केर्टे कर सरकारती नाइंटी वन में लेके उनो ने तो अंचोर किया ता की राजी वांदी के असास्सिनिशन के बाद में देजबर में एक वी तमिल्यन्त पर हम्ला ना हो सिमिल्ले, 1992 में नर्सिमर आउ तो प्रदान मुत्री बन चुकेते तबता उनहो ने क्यो नहीं बाप्री मज्जित को देमालिश होने से रोका या फिर उस प्रोसिस को क्यो नहीं बहुत पहले कहतं करतिया after all, there were ample indications that the thousands of car sevats who had assembled in Ayodhya had not assembled there only for a mere ritual puja if people like me, who at that time used to regularly cover Ram Mandir Andolan if we were fairly certain that there could be a wound on the roof of Babri mosque purely on the basis of our sources then the Prime Minister of the country who has a complete intelligence network backup his input comes why didn't he know that what is the plan to demolish Babri mosque still Narasimha Rao did not believe in his government and the other BJP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad leaders like Lal Krishnan, Adwani, Ashok, Singhal etc. to the extent that many Sadhu saints, Baba people also believed in it their belief that there would be no harm on Babri mosque just a symbolic puja and we came back since 1957 after staying in MLA for 14 years on 30th September 1971 the PM Narasimha Rao was appointed as the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh till that time Indira Gandhi had established complete dominance but it was necessary to remove some strong Chief Ministers from the States and instead appointed Nominated Chief Ministers in the same process to remove Brahmanand Reddy and send Narasimha Rao to Andhra Pradesh from this Indira Gandhi started the practice of Nominated Chief Ministers and the same practice is still going on even though it is the BJP in power within 2 years Narasimha Rao lost his job because of poor performance there was no mass base and in the party there were no friends there were more enemies Indira Gandhi was also considered to be the worst then he told his friend that Narasimha Rao would never be the worst in fact one of the chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh J. Vengal Rao who was the opponent of Narasimha Rao he had never lived his autobiography i.e. my life story he had written this in 1996 which confirms the past rumors he had written in his book that Indira Gandhi had complained P. V. has done nothing but flirt around with Lakshmi Kanthamma this woman was the leader of Congress from Andhra Pradesh for many years Vengal Rao's book as i told you was published in 1996 after the defeat of Congress from that book Narasimha Rao was damaged and his political marginalization process was speed up after winning the 1984 elections Rajiv Gandhi when he made his ministry again he did not give Narasimha Rao home ministry he later defends HRD and ultimately went to external affairs peculiarly after 1980 Narasimha Rao never voted for Andhra Pradesh till 1991 in 1984 and 1989 which was voted for 8th and 9th Lok Sabha Narasimha Rao represented Ramte constituency from Maharashtra when 1991 election was announced and Rajiv Gandhi he sent Narasimha Rao SORRY and dropped him along with one of his close friends he told me he was so humiliated that he decided to pack up from Delhi and go away back to his village even before the election was over in 1991 at that time he was packing his books in his study at that time he got news of Rajiv Gandhi's murder only after that Narasimha Rao's political career started he made Manmohan Singh his finance minister and major structural changes started by the way the process of economic liberalization without blemish and everything hunky doli don't believe but it will be wrong to give Narasimha Rao many politically non-partisan economists believe that from the 2nd half of the 1980s Rajiv Gandhi as prime minister had begun the slow and hesitant shift to the market on one side global shift towards market reality on the other side collapse of socialism in eastern europe and the changes in China's economic policies were taking place at the same time in Hindustan balance of payment crisis was taking place in august 1990 the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait affected the economy of India the main reason was that crude oil prices literally gone through the roof finally when Chandrasekhar Prime minister Bane and Yashwan Sinha were his finance minister at the same time the economic advisor who was he from Dr. Mahon those people then took care of India's economy and decided that India will have to pledge the reserves and after that they will get 400 million US dollars in credit so in a way Narasimha Rao there was no other option other than reforms but if he wanted then the negative effects of economic reforms could mitigate or reduce common public or the burden on working class could reduce so what were the negatives of economic reforms first of all the basic value system consumerism or competitiveness the norm of society products or gadgets the race to buy started neighbors and owners this remained not just an adline for a television but became part of our daily thinking health, education and other social sectors allocations started decreasing and this process is still going on this void we all have felt very stark during the Covid-19 pandemic public health system it has completely collapsed we have seen the disease to be treated in government hospitals and many people have died outside of government hospitals without getting treatment there are many other cases which people have spent their savings to pay hospital bills in 1991 under Narasimha Rao economic reforms had imposed constraints on our federal framework that is the state's fiscal powers were reduced due to this many things were affected their probability increased including increased corruption and rise of crony capitalism crony capitalism and new forms of corruption we still have to see clear ideological shift is visible in Indian economic policy from being state controlled to being market friendly society has a disparity it is big poverty and poverty has increased unemployment of the citizens has become contractual if the old work relationship were still going on then after the lockdown was announced the migrants crisis we do not have to see natural resources and now our national lifelines that is Indian railways are being privatized all these Narasimha Rao decisions of time are falling out no wonder that this regime champions PV Narasimha Rao there is no doubt that Narasimha Rao should remind us in the year of birth but maybe not from the sense of devotion but with a critical eye