 This one's an amazing story, right? So in the United States, in many states in America, you know, squatters can enter a vacated home. And if they're not, I think if they're not evacuated from there in 30 days, they gain squatter rights. And basically, it's almost impossible to get rid of them. It's almost impossible to legally get them out. In New York City, a fed up homeowner was arrested. After squatters basically took over a million dollar home that she inherited from her parents. And they changed the door, changed the locks, and it was their home and she went there and she tried to change the locks and she was arrested. Squatters once, she was arrested. You have to go through this legal process of trying to get the squatters out that can take months, years, cost you a fortune, and in trying to get people who are using force against your own property, violating property rights without any, you know, clear cut, unequivocal. You are somehow the problem. You are the bad guy, right? You are the bad guy. It's pretty stunning. Yeah, pretty stunning. And so this was in New York City, right? But you have the same thing in Washington State and Oregon, a bunch of places down the country in Bellevue in Washington. There is a serial, this is kind of interesting. It was a serial squatter, a serial squatter named San Kim. He moved from a house to house. I'm getting this in the free press, which each squat taking so long to reserve, he's got free housing basically. When his recent victim tried to get back into the property he owned, San Kim complained to the cops and the cops arrested the landlord. He was issued a straining order from going within 1,000 feet of his property and the squatter. I mean, you find a vacant house, it's yours, or at least it's yours for a long period of time while the legal system churns to try to get you out of there. Now, all this comes from a legal theory that basically says, this is leftist legal theory, comes out of Yale probably, right? Property ownership is violence and as a society we should do everything we can to make it helpful for property owners. And that's what we're trying to do, trying to make it almost impossible for property owners to defend their property, trying to make it almost impossible for property owners to prevent people from stealing their property, from using their property without permission. And this is all a consequence of kind of a Marxist or neo-Marxist view that all property is theft. You've probably heard that, the leftist yell this at every opportunity. All property is theft, so therefore let's steal it back. This is America. This is the country that was built on the principle of individual rights and among those, you know, property rights. Of all our rights, the right to life, the application of that right is property. It's the ability to use and maintain and sustain and you're the things that you won't. And the United States now not allowing it, not allowing it. It really is stunning, really stunning. I can't, I don't think this exists in other countries. Maybe I'm wrong, but I just don't, I mean, and if all the countries in the world you'd expect, you'd expect it, you'd expect this to be outlawed here. But this is the left dominant of the legal system, the left's dominance of law schools in spite of the Federalist Society's work. This is what happens. It truly is disturbing. Ian Gilmour says at one point, squatters are a huge problem in Germany. Interesting, interesting. What would be interesting is if, how the Germans sold the bomb. I mean, I'd be curious how that happened. Maybe Ian knows. All right, I guess there was a squatting movement and I'm sure the moto was, it was, you know, property is theft, private property is theft.