 We talked about this, I can't remember what it was, a week ago or two weeks ago. Actually when I had Fleming Rose on, if you remember I had Fleming Rose on. When we had Fleming on, we talked about this. Denmark, a country from which Fleming Rose, they got published in the Danish cartoons. The Danish parliament has passed a law that prohibits the burning of the Quran and other religious scriptures in public places with up to two years in prison as a penalty. So I guess you can burn your Quran at home in a non-public space, but you can't burn a Quran in public. Now, this is a clear violation of free speech, but what is more important in a sense is why they're doing this. They're doing this because, not because Jews and Christians are complaining about the burning of the Old Testament or the New Testament, not because Christians are complaining about, I don't know, the horrible depictions of Jesus and museums and so on. They're doing it out of sheer cowardice and explicit capitulation to the worst of the Muslims. They're doing it in capitulation to those people shouting at their father in the streets. They're doing it in capitulation to the Islamists in Europe who would indeed take over Europe and turn it into a Sharia law, totalitarian place. They're doing it as an act of surrender, as an act of submission to Islam. This is the worst kind of appeasement. Now, if you thought, okay, they're doing it because they really are offended by the burning of, but they're not, they don't care. They're doing it to appease the worst people in Europe today. And they think that appeasement will work. All appeasement does is prove to the Islamists, and I'm not even talking about the Muslims because I don't know if a majority of Muslims support this or not, but we're talking about the Islamists. Is this going to satisfy the Islamists? Of course not. They will want the stopping of cartoons of any presentation of Muhammad. They don't want other accommodations for Islam and more and more and more and more until they take over. I think it's unlikely they take over, but that's going to be the direction. The more you appease them, the more they'll demand. Sweden, by the way, refused to pass such a law in spite of the fact that not passing such a law might deny membership in NATO because Turkey is so far still objecting to its participation in NATO, partially because of this idea of burning the Quran, which happens in Sweden more than it does in Denmark. And Sweden is not doing it because the politics of Sweden, the political parties on the far right are strong enough to prevent this from happening in Sweden. But things like this, passing of things like this will encourage far-right political parties in Denmark to raise up. And it's not going to be pretty when far-right political parties raise up in Europe. All right, so that is the Quran. Okay, away from Islam. Oh, I just don't want to read you this tweet. This is good. I like this tweet. This is by an Arab, Lui Ahmed. He writes, someone who fled the Middle East 10 years ago, I came to Europe in hopes of a secular rule of law that protects my right to freedom of speech and freedom from religion. These are the kind of Muslims we want, but I was mistaken. The Islamists who I fled from are thriving in the West and I'm manipulating democracy and the naivete of Westerners to advance the insidious agenda. Today, Denmark bans the burning of the Quran to appease them. In a few years later, criticism of Islam will be banned. Once you give them a finger, they will take the whole hand. That's what they did in most countries. They've wielded political power. Now they enjoy 57 Muslim countries where criticism of Islam leads to imprisonment or death sentence. Why should the West change its laws to cater to Islam? It's literally insane. I cannot believe it's happening. I mean, that's courage. That's courage. And that's the kind of people we need. This is why I'm against kind of blanket bans. We want to allow safe passage to people like this to the West and keep the Islamists where they are.