 Basically, this is a reflection. I'm the coordinator since 2011 of all the excavation of the third university in Rome, something for which I'm really happy and feel very fortunate. We have every year around 200 students during our excavation that takes place for around six months in different sites in Rome and in Tuscany. So what I'm narrating very briefly to you is something which happens within an academic environment. So it's a protected place where through the years we started dealing with huge amounts of students, graduates, people with different goals, with different needs. And this is exactly what made us starting a specific reflection. I started coordinating these groups coming from a musical environment. So I had this idea of teaching, first of all, to the students how to deal in a group. So to get very disciplinated and then how to let the personal capabilities and intention to grow and to empower the entire group. This was very easy at the beginning. They had all the same interests, the same passion. So they spoke the same language. This was more or less what we were doing at the beginning, making very small groups, very basic activities. They had to get into the rhythm. No problems at all until when this project grew a lot in terms that after two or three years, not only we were teaching students, but we had to research to study the results of our excavation and to publish and to communicate. It means that we kept on working with the same little amount of money Italian University gave for excavation to 3,000 euros a year. And that's it. And we had a lot of different tasks going on at the same time. Still believing in the fact that the academic system should be a democratic system. So we have to accept any student and any young graduate that want to take part to the excavation. There was a gap in turn that we started having people with difficulties in behaving. We were not prepared. We were just their archaeologists. And after a while, luckily, and this is what I'm sharing with you just as an archaeologist, we got people with physical disability applying to the excavation. I must confess that at the beginning, I was totally opposite in terms that I was scared by the fact that the physical environment is not ready. We have steps. We have barriers. We have the local authorities, the offices, in charge of the preservation of the site that provide for us a safety officer. But still, I mean, the toilet is a mere, how do you call, the Turkish toilet. So we were somehow ready from a human point of view, but the environment was not. And so that was the question, when is archaeology for all? Because the Academy was telling me, this is democratic. You must accept everybody. But the place was not ready for that. Agnes, the person that broke the rules, made this. Unfortunately, she, this girl, decided to be tested so that to stop us feeling worried. And we have an excavation in a catacomber room. And though she barely walked, she had an operation in the States 10 years ago. Because otherwise, she was just moving in a wheelchair. But still nowadays, she has to stick. She has her mother bringing her around. She barely see. And she came down this entire center step to prove that she wanted to do it. And there was no way we could say no. This is unsafe, please don't. It took one hour and 20 minutes for going down together. We made it. And we made it. Because I didn't want it. I was, oh my god, she's going to fall. It was not my responsibility. But I felt really anxious for that. Since she did that, we started working together. We are working together since 2014. She worked with us for four months a year. And basically, she, this is our deal. Before starting any excavation, and she comes to three different excavations with us every year, we, Agnese and I, have a full walk around the excavation, checking together what we can do and what we cannot. And this is fair. We have a proper relation, transparent, where, now I can say no, but in a context where she knows what she can do. She knows what she wants to do and what she cannot. I think I and all the team grew much more than she did. But clearly, she learned a lot in this year. We have a very nice lab about pottery. We deal with urban context. So our labs are having pottery since the Roman times to the modern time. We make any kind of activity together. It's an inclusive experience. In turn that we are all together. What I'm telling the people taking part to the project is not be with us, but just you need to do this. Go with just as part of an organized project and schedule. She comes to the excavation now. She sees all the excavation and she's happy with it. And we are happy with it because what we learned was exactly to make questions to each other. So I'm not choosing any more in advance. I'm asking her what she thinks. She tells me finally what she needs. And this is important because at the beginning she felt so fortunate of having a chance of taking part to a social activity, educational activity for several months that she was silent and accepting everything. And this is not fair. So now it's a proper exchange. We somehow sometimes break the rules when she comes and travels with us once in a while, of course. It's a kind of break time for all of us. But we learned to adjust and modify our equipment. So at the beginning we see the standing. This was not working, but I couldn't understand it. I stand for eight, nine hours. This is my normal life. I eat standing while going from an excavation to the other. And in the end I realized she told me and we found the proper way of seeing the sitting. And this was an important goal of this relation. Because though we still manage 2,000 euros per six months of field work, but we are becoming capable of adjusting and changing slowly our physical environment. Compared to all the other experiences that I heard today, this is very little. And it's not a broad and social experience. It's in a protected environment, the educational one. But what I found really interesting is that it's a way of broadening a little society but that is still a society. Every person taking part to the excavation can then apply the same tools and strategies to the broad society. So this is inclusive from my point of view. This was fundamental for me because I learned to separate all our goals. If at the beginning I was that world, it was that because I had to teach, I had to research, and I had to publish and communicate. And yes, I has no interest, neither in researching or communicating. She wants to learn. So this is our relation. I don't need to mix all the three with her. There's still a point which is not solved, the economic one. This is a project that rose tremendously, grew within our little community. But the physical environment is not changing. We made little tuning. But what I think we must conceive are ontological field works, web barriers, and not the basic. So that everybody can enter, we can always try to fix. But this is the democratic environment I realized. So the switching was from this is what we have, and you must adjust to our needs. This is it. Thank you.