 So along with Colin and Megan, we've been crafting a problem about collaborative innovation spaces. And the input, as I think the problem, in a big picture sense was the recognition and realization of many of you know that this idea of physical locations where people come together and innovate, whether it's to build technology or to build applications or share ideas or become entrepreneurs, has exploded certainly around this community. Margaret has the Innovation Lab, obviously across the river at the Heart of Business School, WBUR. Radio Ointown has its own I-Labs. There's a plethora of innovation spaces, hacker spaces, maker spaces all around Boston, all around the country now that are popular that people who are going there with varying levels of sort of program, pedagogy, expectation, evaluation from the top down at these places and doing innovative building. And I think the goal of our project along with our team will be to do a couple of things. One is to sort of take a big picture, look at this, the space across the various kinds of spaces, some of which I just mentioned. There are these kinds of spaces that are affiliated with venture capital companies. They have a very particular interest in funding projects that are going to come out and make money and be successful businesses. There are innovation spaces affiliated with universities, obviously here at Harvard and every major university is developing one of these now. They have a very different set of goals and probably a very different set of ideas about how they evaluate success. I think it's fair to say, and we'll talk to the I-Labs extensively, I think as part of our project, that they do themselves have a type of teaching mission and a pedagogical mission separate and apart from whether a particular project emerges from the I-Labs and makes tons of money and gets a venture kind of funding. Independent sort of hacker spaces, maker spaces around town probably have their own set of considerations, they're all bumping up against some of the same core sets of issues, again, relating to pedagogy, evaluation metrics of success. I'm a lawyer, so I come at this and see immediately legal issues, including intellectual property issues around getting people together and hatching out ideas and making sure that intellectual property concerns are being addressed. And I think the goal of our project is to take this book across all of these disciplines, identify commonalities, and really frankly make sure that these different quotes and these different circles are learning from each other. I like to think of it as making sense of the sexy innovation. I'm the only qualification that I would add to the sense of the sexy. Chris said, as much as we're talking about innovation spaces and these different venues around the Boston area, I'm hugely interested in what it means internationally. So if you look at in Africa, for instance, I think there's some 45, 50 I-Labs, I-Hubs, all different kinds of things like that that are cropping up precisely because they don't have the same kind of resources typically in universities that we have here. And if you talk to someone who's running one, they'll say, what should I be doing? How do I know if I'm making progress? How can I think about this? How can I learn from these other spaces? So I just like to further expand the rather large frame than Chris put out there and say that we're really open to kind of looking at all these different venues and figuring out how, well obviously at the scope of it to some extent, they're figuring out what can you learn from these different committees and how can they learn from and work with each other to do more than that.