 I've been covering and posting media bias really going all the way back to the early years of the Bush administration. And I've never seen the media just so blatantly acting as an extension of the Democrat Party as they are right now. I mean, trust me, they've been bad and it's been obvious that they're biased for the Democrat Party. But it just keeps getting worse and worse. And what I mean is they don't seem all that worried about putting on the appearance of objectivity anymore. And they've just gone full left-wing Democrat Party activist. And we're seeing that manifest right now in regards to these latest attempts by this party to undo the 2016 election. I mean, they've literally since day one been trying to impeach them. And yesterday on ABC and CBS Network News, they began floating like backup impeachment narratives in case this latest attempt fails, suggesting that Trump's request to meet the whistleblower are themselves an impeachable offense. And Newsbusters has been covering this as they usually do. I highly recommend the website. I've been reading Newsbusters for a very long time, probably 20 years now. And they covered this saying during a discussion on GMA, that's Good Morning America, about the White House defense strategy, correspondent John Carl Fredtid, quote, in terms of this attack on the whistleblower, it has been relentless. He continued by claiming that the president's criticism of the unknown CIA official might bolster the partisan impeachment push by Democrats. Now demanding to know to out the whistleblower, his own aides have called the whistleblower part of a deep state conspiracy. George, this could well be a violation of federal whistleblower protection laws and is also the kind of thing that could end up being one of the articles of impeachment against the president intimidating the whistleblower. So you can see what they're doing. They're taking something as benign as Trump simply requesting to know who is accusing of these things that Trump says are total lies. Just like he said, the Russian collusion claims were lies and it turned out that he was right. And they're taking that request and they're saying, oh, these are threats. He's targeting him for attack. That's not what's happening. But that's the way they're going to spin it. So Carl's co-host and former Clinton administration official, George Stephanopoulos, unsurprisingly agreed, saying, quote, yeah, the more he tries to target him. So you can see this. There's this theme of spinning Trump's desire to find out who's accusing him of doing something wrong or something impeachable. He wants to know who he is. And I'm sorry, but who's actually being targeted here? I mean, think about it. For the last few years, the media has been demonizing Trump and his supporters to such an extent that it's given the Democrat Party base all the justification they need to take some sort of action. And I've talked a lot about this in past videos. But we've seen examples of this in the form of Antifa and those two ICE facilities. You know, that happened. That occurred as a direct result of the demonization of Trump coming from the Democrat Party and the media. You know, all Trump asked for here is to face his accuser, which is kind of a misnomer in itself because the whistleblower is giving secondhand information, isn't he? He's not actually giving a first hand account, which we now know used to be a requirement to be categorized as a whistleblower and given those protections. The ABC host, John Carl, frets about Trump violating these standards for whistleblower protections. But for some reason, he didn't call the so-called and he didn't call out the intelligence community for covertly changing those standards literally just days before this complaint was put in. So, you know, before you had to be a first hand whistleblower, but they just kind of went in there, you know, changed it around just a little bit, re-released it and boom, the whistleblower comes out secondhand information, which is now apparently acceptable. It wasn't before, but for Trump, they've changed the standards and now you can give secondhand information to take down a president apparently. So, the two hosts here on ABC, George Stephanopoulos and John Carl, both clearly Democrats, we know one of them was actually, you know, part of the Clinton campaign or Clinton administration. And so they're sitting there trying to imagine possible ways to avoid facing Donald Trump in the 2020 election with the former Clinton administration official, Stephanopoulos, throwing out the possibility that Trump could also be impeached if his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, were to refuse to comply with the subpoenas that were issued by the House Democrats. Stephanopoulos says, so if he doesn't comply, that could also mean an article of impeachment. They're just finding impeachment everywhere. They're just reaching the hats, pull out impeachment. So, my question immediately is how would Giuliani's refusal to show up for a subpoena mean that Trump was going to be impeached? You know, who knows? I have no idea because they never explained it in this piece. They just throw that out there. Which, you know, I believe that a lot of this reporting that we're seeing is really just red meat for the base. They're really just trying to string Democrats along, trying to keep them hopeful. Because if you just take everything at its base, Trump has a great economy, border security is getting better. He's making some good, you know, he has negotiated a better trade deal than NAFTA although it hasn't been passed in Congress yet. And like I said in yesterday's video, there's a lot of good stuff coming down the pipe if he could get support instead of just everybody, you know, in the media and then the Democrat Party constantly trying to torpedo him. But back to the impeachment. I don't see how Giuliani ignoring a subpoena would somehow mean that Trump was going to be impeached. They're two separate people. You don't judge and sentence a president based on the actions of somebody else that he has, you know, nothing to do with. And on the topic of ignoring subpoenas, I never seen the media so outraged about this. Nothing's even happened yet. He hasn't ignored any subpoena but reading the news, you would never know that. They're already reporting as if that's happened. But just remember back to the Obama administration and Attorney General Eric Holder. He was subpoenaed in regards to Fast and Furious, the gunrunning secret covert program. He was subpoenaed to testify about that and refuse the subpoena. And in fact, Democrats during the vote to censure him, they actually walked out. They actually got up and walked out of Congress and the media loved it. The media were applauding them and pushing them on. So when they try to say that they're so outraged that Giuliani might ignore the subpoena, which I highly doubt he will. Just think of that. And I'm not saying it's good or bad if he ignores it. I'm not a lawyer. I don't know. I'm just saying that once again, this entire thing is being based on a complete set of double standards. You see, these are Democrats refusing to vote to censure Eric Holder for refusing to comply with the subpoena. Every attempt to impeach Trump up to this point since day one has failed. And if this latest attempt fails, the Giuliani thing fails, they still have one more card to play. And that is anything is impeachable. Hearing on Monday's Good Morning America, ABC News chief legal analyst Dan Abrams adopted a remarkably flexible standard for what can justify for removing a duly elected president of the United States from office. Arguing that quote anything could be deemed an impeachable offense. Not a specific violation of a crime, but that has been determined in the past to be an impeachable offense. Anything in theory can be impeachable. The question becomes, does the Congress want to move forward with an impeachment proceeding? Nothing illegal was done. And in fact, there's no evidence that there was any wrongdoing at all. These same people reported for years that Trump colluded with Russia and even that he was a Russian agent. But that all predictably turned out to be a steaming pile of BS. So now they're so desperate that they're setting their standard for impeachment to literally anything. Clearly, these partisan mouthpieces for the DNC are doing all they can to better their chances in 2020. I mean, let's remember back when Clinton was being impeached for lying under oath during an investigation. The media executed the exact same strategies that they do now. That is, circle the wagons around the Democrat and focus all attacks on the political opposition. When someone drives as one House Judiciary Committee member put this some weeks ago, a truck bomb up to the steps of the Capitol and just dumps it on them. Now, this is politically a very violent action for Ken Starr to leave this on them weeks before an election. Couldn't this be just a witch hunt? Couldn't the Democrats who've been in present Clinton's people who've been defending him all these months be right? That even though he screwed up, there's some political motivation there? Let's not pretend for a moment that the Starr report is a balanced, judicious presentation. It's not. It is a partisan prosecutor with some zealous age who's trying to make a case against the guy he despises. He was obligated to write a report and deliver a report to Congress. Was he also obligated to make it as adversarial as it turned out to be? In France, Le Monde described the report as a monster worthy of the reports of the inquisition where deviants and heretics were hunted down to the depth of their soul. It seems that nothing has changed. That's all I have for you today, folks. Make sure to check out the 24-hour live stream event from the southern border on my channel starting tonight at 7.30pm Eastern. The end of this video is going to be a little 5-minute promo that the Operation Border Control guys put together to just explain what this event is and what they hope to accomplish. I hope to see you all there. Please like, share, and subscribe. Well, I'm here to share with you some wonderful and exciting news on just that subject. People ask me, why am I going to the border? Why am I going to do a 20-day journey into dangerous territory, into cartel areas to bring the truth back to the American people? Why? Well, because I love America and I love my country. We will start in Brownsville, Texas, and we will go the entire length of the border all the way to San Diego, California to show you, the American people, what the politicians in Washington, D.C. do not want you to see. The media wants to portray a different picture. The Democrats want to distract you away from the real problem. We are going to do a border investigation where we will be doing live streaming as well as a film crew with us to record everything that we're seeing and doing to make a documentary about our border. There's a lot of security, a lot of logistics, and a lot of technology that's got to be put in place. Not to mention the fact, we're taking about 14 combat veterans on the road for 20 days. Go to bordercommand.com and see all the wonderful American patriots that will be joining us in a 24-hour marathon. Number two, share this with everyone you know, whether you've got a Facebook group you're a part of, you've got some friends on Twitter, Facebook, wherever, share this information. You can share videos, you can share the website. As always, I'm Douglas Nicodi and I hope you have a wonderful and blessed day. Stand behind us, patriots, we need you right now. Go to bordercommand.com for all the information you're going to need.