 It is time to set those waivers for week number six in your season-long fantasy football leagues. And we are here to answer your questions and get you set for that run of waivers going tonight. My name is Jim Sonnis. I am a senior writer and analyst for numberfire.com, joined here as always by JJ Zacharias, an editor-in-chief of Number Fire and FanDuel JJ. We are on to week number six. How are you doing today? I'm good. A lot of injuries this week. I feel like my entire 15 transactions column was just on running backs. I tried to force talking about, I mean, there's Kidarius Tony and then I had AJ Brown as a vibe, but there wasn't that much to talk about with wide receivers. It's just a very big running back week. It's rough. The good thing is we do get Christian McCaffrey back this week. That's a positive. We get closer to Davin Cook and Joe Mixon being healthier. So at least there are some positives, but a lot to digest here and we will break it all down for you in just one second. First, a quick reminder to make sure you are getting your questions in. No matter where you are watching, we'll take questions via YouTube, Twitch, Facebook or Twitter. No matter where you're watching, you can get your questions in. We'll take them live here on air. Help you get those wavers set. While you're there, make sure you are subscribed and come back here. We are live Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, talking NFL here on the FanDuel YouTube, Twitch, Facebook and Twitter pages. Let's start things off with Alvin over on YouTube. He had Clyde Edward D. Lair, but CEH has put on IR right now. He has Zach Moss, Davin Cook and Alexander Madison, but would you trade Chris Godwin for Kareem Hunt in half PPR? Chris Godwin fighting with Mike Evans and Antonio Brown for targets, but Kareem Hunt do for some pretty serious touchdown regression here in the near future, I would assume, for Cleveland. JJ, would you trade Chris Godwin for Kareem Hunt in Alvin's situation? I don't think it's a bad trade. I think it's a fair enough trade. If you want to do that, you can do that. I don't understand the end of that. I see Ridley's on the buy. Who is C. David or Corey Davis? Corey Davis, yeah. I do think that that leaves your wide receivers a little bit thin. I might say no to it from that standpoint, but again, I think that Hunt and Godwin are in the same tier within their position where they both have nice floors each week. They obviously have touchdown upside each week as well, but as you noted, Kareem Hunt is a big touchdown regression candidate. I wrote about it in my 15 transactions column this week. I spoke on it on my podcast. I know that I said the same thing last week and then he came out and had this 26-point performance, but I think that we need context with that. The context is that it was a 90-point game, and we can't expect a 90-point. If I were guaranteed that Kareem Hunt was going to play in a 90-point game every week, yeah, he'd be a top two running back for me from here on out. We can't assume that, of course, but then the other thing that I looked at at historically over the last 10 years, running backs and their rushing touchdowns divided by their total team offensive touchdowns and Kareem Hunt's rates. It's basically a touchdown share, but only looking at rushing touchdowns. His touchdown share in that offense is one that has only been hit by 21 running backs over the last 10 years. There's two of them per season. Of those 21 running backs, the vast majority of them, the average among that group, basically had twice as much of a running back rush share as Kareem Hunt currently has, and they had seven more attempts per game than Kareem Hunt currently has. Why? Because volume leads to touchdowns. Volume is what drives everything in fantasy football, and while Kareem Hunt is still seeing a decent enough amount of volume, it's still not to this point of like, he's this full-blown RB one. I know that I went on a little bit of a tangent there, but I think that what I'm trying to say is that God went and Hunt still sort of in the level playing field. I think a lot of people would look at this and say, just go take Kareem Hunt because he's an RB one in fantasy. Running backs are more scarce than wide receivers are, but I think that this is a pretty even trade, but given the wide receivers that are left on your team, I don't know if I would do it. And I like Zach Moss, too. He was a buy for me this week. They have a really good schedule upcoming. Yeah, your running backs aren't too bad, Alvin. And I would say too, like Tony, with that ankle injury, I might be a little bit wary about depleting wide receiver depth there. And also with Kareem Hunt, Nick Chubb has actually had as many, or he's had more red zone chances than Kareem Hunt every week has ever won. The one week he did not was week two where they had the same number. So eventually that pendulum was going to swing back towards Chubb and that's going to hurt Hunt there. So Alvin, I think you're actually okay at running back right now. That's my assessment there. Yeah, Kareem Hunt, four goal line rushes this year, three touchdowns. Nick Chubb, six goal line rushes, one touchdown. I mean, this is not going to keep up at this pace through the rest of the season. Regression. Let's talk to Daniel on YouTube. Are you worried with T.J. Hawkinson's usage the past three weeks? T.J. Hawkinson, J.J. banged up. And I feel like we're seeing some effect of that. So what's your worry level with T.J. Hawkinson right now? Kind of worried. I mean, I think you have to be a little bit worried after he was like a top two tight end. I mean, he's like the tight end after the first couple of weeks. And then, you know, the last three weeks, he's basically been a tight end three in fantasy. And so you have to be worried in some way, for sure, because his target shares aren't matching the usage. And I say usage from the standpoint of snaps and routes run. If you look at his snaps and his routes run data, pretty identical to weeks one and two. There's really not that much that's different. I think that what we're seeing is he played a little over his head early in the season. He's in an offense that doesn't have a lot of alternatives. And so defenses can key in on Hawkinson. I mean, that's not the end. I mean, it's not a death sentence for him. And no offense to you, Jim, but Jared Goff is not elite, by any means. No offense anymore. Yeah. So you have you have a poor quarterback play to go along with him being basically the sole weapon in that offense outside of DeAndre Swift and maybe Jamal Williams out of the backfield. But you don't have pass catchers to take, take the defense, take defenders off of Hawkinson. And then this injury is lingering. So I think that if you have Hawkinson, you have to just hope that it is the injury that's really causing this and maybe it is the injury and then everything will be good once he's healthy. But I don't think that you can really do anything with him right now. You probably just still have to play him because the tight end position sucks. And then, and then on top of that though, you can't really sell them because people are going to look at his recent production and say, I don't want this. And TJ Hawkinson, we know has a ceiling. We know that he can bounce back. So I would hold tight with Hawkinson, but also be concerned. I think you can do both of those things. I'll talk to you to Nanda here are Nihime Hines, Tyson Williams or Latavius Murray, droppable looking to pick up Devontae Booker in a defense. Latavius is operating his lead back for the Ravens, isn't getting targets, but is getting some work. Tyson Williams didn't do a whole lot last night, even when he was active. Nihime Hines losing work not only to John Taylor, but also to Marlon Mcatimes as well. So what's your assessment of those three guys? Part of me feels like they were trying to feature Marlon Mc a little bit for a trade. I think the same thing the game before too. So I think that you're correct, but they've done it for multiple games now, which is kind of annoying. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, maybe they were like, Oh man, there were a lot of running back injuries, you know, on Sunday. So we're going to just see if we can, we can get Marlon Mc and Marlon Mc looked good. All things considered too. I think of those three, I probably, if it's a PPR format, I like Hines the most. I don't think that we can really try. Like, I think both of us would agree that Tyson Williams has probably been the best running back in that backfield this year. But John Harbaugh doesn't think that's an answer. Right. So it doesn't matter. I mean, at the end of the day, you know, you hope that talent wins out at the running back position, which is why we do evaluate talent at the running back position. But at the end of the day, you know, coaches are the ones that are making the choices to put these guys in the field or not. And if they trust Latavius Murray Moore, even if he looks like he's running in mud, uh, I, you know, you have to prefer Latavius over Tyson. So I would rank them Hines Latavius Tyson right now. Same for me as well. Let's talk to Joseph. Are you still holding Trey Lantz? Lantz is on a buy this week. His knee is banged up and Jimmy Garoppolo might be back for week seven. So would you hang on to Trey Lantz? Given that if he does start, he's a very good fantasy asset, or he couldn't bait to get that roster spot. Yeah. He's banged up too. You know, there was that announcement, like during the Monday night or before the Monday night game that the Trey Lantz had, I think it's a knee issue. Yeah. Yeah. Kneespring. So, you know, you're running into that. So I don't think Trey Lantz is going to start in the short term. They're going to take their time with that, I would assume. So let's just say that Jimmy Garoppolo gets like another three weeks in him. They have a buy this week. I mean, it's one of those things where it depends entirely on your league and your league structure. If it's a league that's fairly shallow, that, you know, like looking at your waiver wire right now, and if like Daryl Williams is on your waiver wire, then it's probably a normal to shallow league. Whereas, you know, I'm in a lot of leagues right now where Daryl Williams was already rostered and those kinds of leagues, you know, your bench space, you know, you can, you can, you can afford to hold on to a guy like Trey Lantz just because there's not that many good alternatives on the waiver wire. But if a guy like Kaderis, Tony's still out there, Daryl Williams, Devante Booker, those are the kind of guys that, you know, that's probably normal league. You know, I say, I shouldn't say shallow because a lot of leagues are still have those guys out there. And so as a result, I think that you can drop Trey Lantz in a league like that. I think that makes a lot of sense. You know, think of what you're dropping him for. If you're dropping for something good, do it. Like that's, that's kind of the calculus there. Let's talk to Jack. Rest of season to Mark Cooper, Chase Claypool, Juju Smith Schuster, now done for the year, most likely for Pittsburgh, opens up targets, but it's also Dak Prescott versus Ben Rothesberger. So a couple of different factors at play here. Who do you prefer between those two guys? Yeah, let's break this down from like the standpoint of team and then player. Team wise, the Cowboys might score like twice as many points as Steelers from here on out. So we know that the Cowboys offense is a little bit better. I mean, realistically, we could end up seeing the Steelers maybe have a little bit more passing volume from here on out just because of the way that the teams are structured right now and how well they're playing. But I, and then you look at the players and the reason I'm saying that is because then you look at the players are, you know, is the target share projection between Amari Cooper and Chase Claypool from here on out that's significantly different. Like maybe, maybe without Juju, we see Claypool in like the 23% range, maybe the 24% range, which would be great. But Amari Cooper is probably still going to be in the, even when Michael Gallop returns, probably going to be in like the 22% range. So given the fact that he's playing that better offense, I know that, you know, he's been banged up and he's dealt with his injuries. Chase Claypool has too. I would just prefer to lean towards, even if this was like a tiebreaker thing, which I still think it's not, but I think you just lean towards the guy who's playing in the better offense. And even when he's been banged up, Amari's still getting production, but I think it's really encouraging for him to talk to Ben. By the way, I like Claypool. So I don't want that to be taken as like me not liking Claypool from here on out. I love Claypool. Yeah, it's more pro Amari. Yeah, I agree. Okay. Ben is in super flex leak. He's got Justin Fields is quarterback two with Matt Ryan on the buy is Gino Smith worth an ad. So Gino, we know he's been a backup for a reason for a while, but goes in a situation where he has Tyler Lockett and DK Metcalf, which is a lot better than like whatever he had with the jets. I think he was before Eric Decker when he was starting back in the day. So the situation around is much better. What are you doing here with Gino if you need a quarterback in super flex? Yeah, I mean, like, let's just be real with this right now with Justin Fields. They're not running Justin Fields. The reason you drafted Justin Fields or you have Justin Fields in your fantasy team is because you wanted the rushing production. And through his three starts, this is a stat that I tweeted out yesterday or maybe Sunday, but through his three starts, he has 25 rushing yards. Tom Brady over the last three weeks has 30 rushing yards. I mean, like, like how insane is it that Tom Brady, like I'm visibly angry right now because it's so ridiculous that you have a guy who ran a 4, 4, 4, 40 at his pro day and Tom Brady has more rushing yards than him through Justin Fields' first three weeks as a starter. So I mean, you have to look at it from that standpoint and then look at it from the, from the perspective that they're not throwing a lot. You know, Justin Fields, they, they're averaging 19 pass attempts and 19 targets per game, which, you know, if you want to compare that to the Buccaneers just, just for fun, the Buccaneers have thrown the ball, have averaged 44 targets, team targets per game. 19 throws in a quarter. Yeah, exactly. Like 19 is so small. I mean, Devonte Adams over the last three weeks has 45 targets. The Bears as a team have 57. I mean, it's just, they're just not throwing the ball. He is throwing the ball down the field at a decent, at a decent enough clip, but you know, Justin Fields without the rushing production is, I mean, like he's worse than Ben Rothesberger, like from a fantasy standpoint. And so you can't really feel good about that. So Gino Smith without Russell Wilson, because of what we've seen from Justin Fields. Now look, we have to hope that they eventually let Justin Fields escape the pocket more, run a little bit more. You know, the last two weeks, we haven't seen him in a negative game script where he could scramble a little bit more and throw the ball a little bit more. So be cognizant of that too. I'm not saying drop Justin Fields in a super flex format, but Gino Smith is entering a situation like you said, that's not bad. I mean, he looked good against one of the best defenders in the league this past week. He has two of the best wide receivers in the game to throw to, and the system itself can work for him because he's a mobile quarterback, similar to Russell Wilson, and he can get some rushing juice from a fantasy perspective. So, you know, I would try to add Gino Smith. If I have Justin Fields is like my QB too. And, you know, try to keep both of them in a super flexly, but I would definitely be trying to add Gino Smith this week. I think the good thing for Justin Fields is that like you said, they've not been in a negative script yet. And as he gets more comfortable, Bill laser may be more okay. Letting him rip a bit more. We're not there yet. They did not, like he played well in week four and they still didn't open things up in week five. So we're not there yet. But there is a path to that. We're not there yet though. So I think that if you can get that, that Gino production for now, that is a worthwhile situation to target. Let's talk to Andre. We talked about TJ Hawkinson before. What about Dawson Knox? Dawson Knox, three deep targets on Sunday coverage, optional, getting red zone work as well. What are your thoughts on Dawson Knox going forward? It's one of those situations in fantasy football where, you know, if you only analyze the player, if you solely look at the player, yeah, he's a sell. Like, yeah, Dawson Knox isn't going to keep this up through the rest of the season, but you have to look at what the market is saying. And I guarantee you that the market is not sitting there saying Dawson Knox is a top three tight end in fantasy football or top four tight end fantasy football. So, you know, it's one of the situations where, yeah, hypothetically you could sell them, but I don't think that you're going to get any sort of like reasonable market for them. And honestly, you know, I kind of group, he's scoring points in a very different way than like Dalton Schultz is, but these guys who have emerged and come out of nowhere and are producing like tight end ones, you know, you have to give this context to the tight end position and the tight end position is terrible. And so both of those guys could be tight end ones from here on out. Like I think Dawson Knox is a tight end one from here on out. He has the right environment for him to do well in the tight end position. You only need three or four targets to be relevant. You know, if those targets are highly valued targets and high leverage targets. So, you know, I think Dawson Knox, you know, if you only look at the player, yeah, sure, he's a sell from the standpoint that his production is not going to maintain at this rate, but he's not a sell from the standpoint of when you look at what the market is saying, I still think that the market is probably still too low on Dawson Knox just because people don't think it's real. Right. And like, we saw from Robert Tenian last year, like, you get targets like that in a very good offense. You can be a viable fantasy option the entire year at tight end. So if you're going to get a legit return for him, sure. But the odds you get that are pretty small, most likely the lower racks, low racks. Miles Gaskin got dropped. Would you prioritize him over Darrell Williams, Clio Herbert and Devonte Booker? Man, that's a really interesting question actually. So I had Miles Gaskin as a hold this week on 15 transactions. I just wanted to talk about Gaskins. I felt like we would get some questions and I would get some questions this week about Gaskin. Is he going to do what he did this past week? No, he's not going to have like a 25 plus percent target share every week. He's not going to have 10 targets. They're not even going to have a pass heavy script like they had against Tampa Bay, you know, a team where teams have just given up running the football against Tampa Bay. So that's really what these run games against the Buccaneers have become. It's just the short passes, whether it's to the running back or to wide receivers to stay closer to the line of scrimmage, you're going to see teams attack Tampa Bay in that way. The thing with Gaskin, though, that's interesting, is number one, he played well. And when players play well, you have to think about how our coaches are going to react and maybe coaches look at this and they say, well, maybe we should throw Gaskin on the field a little bit more. Because up until that point, his highest game in terms of snap share was like 60 percent. He was lower than that in a lot of games this year. I mean, that was his high. This past week, it was 68 and a half percent. So he's on the field a lot more than what we've seen from weeks one through four. That's something that you can latch on to and say, well, maybe they do utilize Miles Gaskin a little bit more, and they have a pretty favorable schedule upcoming. So we should probably at least want Miles, not throw him on the waiver wire. I think that this is like so totally fluky. It was somewhat fluky, but not so totally fluky. It depends on me. I think that if you look at those players that you were referencing Daryl Williams, Khalil Herbert and Devonte Booker, I don't think Khalil Herbert's in this conversation. So we can kind of knock him out. And I like Daryl Williams more than Devonte Booker right now. I don't like these rumors about Marlon Mack potentially going to Kansas City. I know they just got Elijah McGuire. So maybe that means that they're not going to go after Marlon Mack, which would be great. I think Daryl Williams would probably be the 1A regardless. But you know, I like Daryl Williams more than Devonte Booker because I think that there's a chance that the CEH injury lingers more. He's already on IRs. It's already going to be three weeks, but it could linger more than the the Saquon Barkley injury could. And it's just a better situation in general for Daryl Williams. So I prioritize Williams more than Booker. So this comes down to Gaskin versus Williams. And I would say, do you need a long-term option, which I think you could say Miles Gaskin would be the guy, or do you need immediate production, which would be Daryl Williams? That's how I would handle this. The one complicating factor here is I don't think the Dolphins have a buy after their London trip, which is really strange. They're in London this week. And I think that they don't have their buy right away, which is a weird choice. But so you would at least get Gaskin in the short-term a bit as well, which may help if you're in the short-term versus long-term equation there. Sock to Alvin, how much of your waiver budget would you place on Remandre Stevenson and Devonte Booker? You thought of Booker a bit there, Saquon Barkley not on IR yet. And it sounds like there's a chance he could be back decently soon. Stevenson, more of a speculative type thing. Damian Harris is fine, but also fumbled and potentially might have gotten benched in addition to the injury this past week. So what are you looking at with Stevenson and Booker here? Yeah, I like Stevenson as an ad this week. For the reason you talk here, that ribs injury, that doesn't sound that bad. So I'm not really that concerned about that, but he did have those fumbling issues. He's now fumbled in two really, really important key parts of the field in times in the game against Miami in week one and then Houston this past week as he was trying to score a touchdown. So I like Stevenson as no one's really thinking about him kind of ad, at least in a more casual and normal league. So I would say you can get Stevenson probably for five to 10, maybe 10% of your budget this week and feel fine about that with Booker. All of this depends on league size as we say every single week. It all depends on league size and what your waiver wire looks like and the size of your bench and all that. If we're just talking about like a 12 team league with like six guys on your bench, I think the Booker is probably in the 15 to 25% range. I think it depends on what you need. If you don't really need Devonte Booker, if you don't really need a running back, you should still try to add him just because he's valuable. But I would go more towards the bottom end of that range and go more towards the 15%. But if you do need him, I can make the argument even to go to the 30% range if you really, really need him. If you have Saquon or something and you're a little bit worried, I can make that argument. But I would say, don't go crazy. This reminds me of some of the other waiver wire ads that we've had this season where people just go completely, even like Chuba Hubbard when people just went like, absolutely nuts with Hubbard. And it's like, yeah, I get it. Booker's going to step in. I mean, Booker saw Saquon Barclay usage without Saquon Barclay in that game against Dallas. So I get it, guys. I mean, he's going to be a very usable piece over the next couple of weeks. But this is sort of like a Chuba Hubbard situation where I feel like people assume that Barclay is going to be out for eight weeks or something like that when the timeline is more conservative than that and looks a little bit better than that. So I'd say, don't go above the 25% range for Booker. It also seems very likely that Mike Glennon is starting and that does downgrade the outlook for Booker as well. Assuming that it's just like a one-week thing. For Saquon, Dananda, would you trade in half PPR, Chase Claypool from Mark Andrews, or Chase Claypool in the Tavius Murray for Chase Edmonds? Mark Andrews just went off last night. So I don't know if there's just like recency bias, but like, I kind of want the Mark Andrews side of this one. What are your thoughts here? Yeah. I mean, these trades are fine. I don't really have a preference, like a super strong preference. You know, you're trading Claypool at a time where he's coming off a big game obviously, but I'm expecting him to see not necessarily a spike in target share, but a more consistent target share week in and week out. I mean, he's already seen no less than a 22% target share in each of his last three games. So, you know, he's being utilized in a pretty decent way. It's just that, you know, there's always these question marks about like what happens in 12 personnel, two wide receiver sets with Pittsburgh. And now that Juju Smith Schuster's out, there's no question that we're going to see Chase Claypool, you know, be on the field in two wide receiver sets, which is great. So he can see more, more, more upside. So if you need a tight end, sure. That's a, I think that's a fair trade. If you need a running back, I think that's fair enough too. I mean, this is really Claypool for Chase Edmonds because I don't see Latavius Murray as this like interesting or meaningful piece. I think it's fine. I mean, Edmonds was banged up. He didn't have a great game this past week. But yeah, I think that both trades are reasonable and fair. It just depends on what your need is. Let's talk to Amandja over on YouTube. Would you trade Dak Prescott and Darrell Williams for Kyler Murray in a single quarterback, a 12-person PPR league? So you're getting an upgraded quarterback. You're giving up a piece who is not like a huge needle mover to do it. Do you view Kyler as being that big of an upgrade over Dak or what are you seeing here? Yeah, I think this is fine too. You know, if you have decent enough running back depth and you know that you're not going to start Darrell Williams while CEH is out, you know, let's even assume that CEH is out for four weeks. Maybe you get two pretty good performances from Darrell Williams in those four weeks. Yeah. I mean, this is an upgrade at the quarterback position. I typically don't really care about going for an upgrade at the quarterback position, especially when you have Dak Prescott. But I think this is reasonable enough. You know, I think that looking at this trade, it feels like one of those situations where the team that's giving up Dak Prescott and Darrell Williams probably is pretty loaded. Like it's feeling pretty good right now. And if you can get Kyler there, then you're in a good spot. The one thing I'd say Amandja is I would check out the injury report Wednesday because Kyler's shoulder was kind of weird on Sunday. So if he's a full go and practice Wednesday, I feel a lot better about that one. CJ and hat PPR was offered Aaron Jones for us, Neckler. Would you make this deal? Again, could be recency buys, but like I feel like with Aaron Jones losing some red zone work to AJ Dillon this past week, which was really weird and really frustrating. A little bit wary of Aaron Jones right now. And I feel like I'd rather have Eckler here. Where do you land on this one? Yeah, man. Eckler's it. You know, after I saw Eckler get the goal line work that he got in week one against Washington. It was I was all in on Eckler. I mean, it was just a buy high. I don't care. Get us and Eckler. He's seeing perfect usage behind a good offensive line and a good offense with the stud quarterback. You know, I know that you can make a similar argument for Aaron Jones, but there's no AJ Dillon in that backfield. So I'm going to go with us and Eckler over Aaron Jones. All right, talk to DJ. Should I go to Devonte Booker or Chuba Hubbard? I don't think Chuba is probably someone I'd be looking to add right now, given CMC is going to play this week. So Devonte over Chuba, correct? Yep. Okay. Let's talk to Jack, who is asking. I scroll past the comment. Here we go. Wow. I always do that. Okay. Rest of season. Tyler Lockett or Deontay Johnson. So Deontay getting more targets now, but Gina Smith also starting for Lockett. So what do you see in here? I think you have to go with Deontay Johnson because of the injury. And not only that, but the injury to Juju Smith Schuster. You know, Deontay had a really weird game this past week where he had that big touchdown and then he just, he had like an 8% target share in that game. I would not expect that week in and week out, but yeah. I mean, Deontay Johnson is great. He's a lock, no pun intended. And the thing that scares me about Lockett is the deep ball ability of Gina Smith and that connection and whether or not that's there. You know, Lockett over the first couple of weeks when he was just completely destroying fantasy football, he was almost a large, a large portion of that and those points that are being scored were happening on 15 plus area throws, 20 plus area throws. So is that going to be there with Gina Smith? I mean, you're going from one of the best deep ball passers and best quarterbacks in the league to, you know, a backup. I mean, we can think that Gina Smith is a good backup, but he's still a backup. So yeah, I'm going to go with Deontay Johnson, even though Ben Rothesburg is also playing like a backup. Okay. Let's give Justin a temperature check here on Antonio Gibson, banged up with that, like apparently a broken leg, which is pretty wild. But he's still producing and he's getting a lot of carries, getting his two targets every game. What are your thoughts on Antonio Gibson right now? Yeah. I mean, here's the thing. Anytime that you're looking at a player and you say, well, his usage, there's question marks around that usage, but he's finding the end zone a lot. Typically, that's not the best sign in the world. And I'm not saying that Antonio Gibson's not an RB two at least. I mean, he's at least a mid-range high-end RB two. The problem with Gibson, you know, with the usage is that he's not seeing work as a receiver. They're still using JD McKissick pretty heavily as a receiver. He has like a 12% target share since week one. Antonio Gibson has a 6% target share since week one per game. He has two targets in every game since week one. That's just not a lot of work through the air. That's with a changing quarterback. And there's a lot of data that suggests that quarterbacks drive at least a portion of the kind of looks that running backs get, but it's a combination of like Taylor Heinecke being back there and also their use of JD McKissick. So temperature check on Antonio Gibson, you know, if I would, I would say he's mostly a hold, but if I were to lean one way, I might lean sell a little bit more than buy, but I would wait until after this week because they're getting Kansas City. So don't go selling Antonio Gibson right now because that game could be very, very high scoring. Antonio Gibson against Daniel Sorensen is going to be fun. Let's talk to Andre quickly here about the Ravens. Can we safely say the Ravens have become much more pass-heavy offense? We've seen recently, Marquis Brown has seen a top 15 wide receiver going forward. They will get Rashad Bateman likely back in week six. So that's likely to happen here, but also like their one game isn't as good as it was before. I think that's, it's, you combine that with Lamar Jackson just playing out of his mind as a passer. And I feel like we can bump up their baseline pass rate a bit, but I don't want to go too crazy on it. So JJ, what do you think about this Ravens passing offense going forward? Yeah, I actually think what's driving it most is that the defense sucks. The defense is just not playing well, right? I mean, like, like we have not seen a Ravens defense like this with Lamar Jackson under center ever. And so because that defense is so bad, there's more negative game scripts and that's forcing them to throw the ball more. And, you know, they're still like not the most pass-heavy team in the league, but they are throwing it a little bit more. And like you mentioned, you know, the Rashad Bateman, his return to injury or from injury is going to, it's going to hurt Marquis Brown at least a little bit. But again, I feel like Marquis Brown is another one of those guys where like the production doesn't match the way people view him in fantasy. Like, like you couldn't, you wouldn't be able to get, if you had Marquis Brown and you're like, I want to sell him right now, you wouldn't be able to get a top 15 wide receiver for him probably because people don't see what he's doing as sustainable. Well, it's not totally sustainable. He scored now in nine of his last 11 games and that should be 10 because one of those games was that Detroit game where he dropped like eight touchdowns. And so, so yeah, I mean, I think that that Marquis Brown is probably like a top 20 wide receiver, maybe not 15 top 20 wide receiver moving forward. I don't think that's that crazy to think. And a lot of it is driven by, I think not only Lamar Jackson just being dope, but like the fact that that defense is just so, so it's just not playing well at all. Under what I would do right now is go to Marquis Brown's fan to a player pool or like player page, click on him and then check out the yardage numbers recently. It's not just touchdowns. The yardage has been amazing and consistent. And that's like, that's new. So I feel like we should be bumping him up too. So, Nick, should I prioritize Jacobi Myers or Rondale Moore off the waiver while trying to get both but only can use priority on one. Rondale Moore did see an increase in his route rate this past week. Max Williams got hurt too. So we could see some more for receiver sets of the Cardinals. He took away some snaps from Christian Kirk and for your seven receiver sets too. So who would you rather have Jacobi Myers or Rondale Moore? I don't like cars, but you know, I'm not a car guy, but I would say that Jacobi Myers is like a Honda Civic. You know, like he's fine. You know, you can get Jacobi Myers. You're gonna, you're gonna be fine. Look, I used to have a Honda Civic. I love that thing. Rondale Moore, I don't have an analogy for this. I don't know what a good car comparison for Rondale Moore would be, but he's not a Honda Civic. He's got a lot more, he's got a lot more upside, a lot more juice. He's a lot more fun. I think that Rondale Moore is the ad off the waiver wire because in a league like this where both those guys are on the waiver wire, you have to assume that most teams are good. It's probably shallow league. You need more upside on your bench. So I'm going to go with Rondale Moore over Jacobi Myers. I might go with Rondale Moore in most leagues over Jacobi Myers at this point. Rondale Moore has a lot of score touchdowns. Covey Myers is not. I think that's a pretty easy discussion there for sure. Let's talk to DJ. We talked about this one in 15 transactions, JJ. Is it time to drop Trace Sermon and replace him with other running back stashes like Lil Herbert? Maybe not Jamar Jefferson, but like in general, would you drop Sermon for a running back stash? Yeah. Jamar Jefferson is not someone that I would, I would really add because he's still number three on the depth chart, but he's number four. Godwin, Igway butte. He's strictly special teams used to play safety, but Godwin, Igway butte, go cats. Number three running back. That's actually, I totally forgot. So the thing about, the thing with Trace Sermon is he's basically a handcuff now because we know that they utilize Elijah Mitchell as the lead back, as the 1A in that offense. We now have, like, I know that we have these priors from August as to how we felt about the San Francisco backfield. And I know that they kind of lied to us because they use Trace Sermon even as the starter in the preseason at some point. And then all that stuff happened with that two weeks in between the last preseason game and the start of the season, week and a half, whatever. And then week one happens and he was a surprise inactive. But since week one, every action that they've taken has shown us that they like Elijah Mitchell more than Trace Sermon. Literally every opportunity that Elijah Mitchell has had to see the field over Trace Sermon, he has. And Trace Sermon this past week had two snaps. Elijah Mitchell had 40. And it's a situation where I would much rather have Mitchell and Trace Sermon, we've seen him in action as a starter, wasn't very good in fantasy. He's very average. I mean, he was like an RB3 in fantasy when he was the starter. So we know he's not even a high end handcuff. And that's why I think you can drop him. Obviously, you know, things can change. And, you know, maybe he develops a little bit more. He's a rookie. I get all that. But Elijah Mitchell looks to be the guy in that offense. It makes sense. Because like I said, and like we talked about at the beginning of the season, he's like a Raheem Moster clone. They're like the same kind of player. And that's Kyle Shanahan clearly has a thing for that. Yeah. Jeff Wilson be back eventually, but Elijah Mitchell's rest season outlook is pretty good. So I think that's Trace Sermon. Pretty easy guy to drop for me. That is all that we have here for today on this FanDuel Live Q&A. But as mentioned, we are back once again on Thursday, Thursday Night Football preview. Brandon Godula will have that from four to 430. Then on Friday, we'll have our snake draft four to 430 to get you set for week number six. JJ, you can find on Twitter at late round QB and check out the late round podcast by searching for the late round podcast wherever you get your podcast. JJ, we appreciate the time. Good luck to you with waivers this week and in week number six. Thanks, Jim. Appreciate it, man. All right. I am on Twitter as well at Jim Sonnis, J-I-M-S-A-N-N-E-S. Big thank you to Joy Affleck, our video producer for running the video side of things here today. Thank you, Joy as always. And thank you to everyone for tuning in. Good luck to you with waivers. We'll talk to you once again next week. This has been the Waverwire Q&A.