 My name is Granjur Jnitsa, I'm a postdoctoral researcher at Grass University of Technology in Austria and they all present the visualization driven training for vibrotactile skin reading, which is our paper. Just a bit of context, skin reading is conveying complex information through vibrotactile displays and typically this is done by first encoding symbols which could be letters or phonemes and then expanding towards sentences. And there's a lot of research done in this field, especially in finding locations, simulation methods and also encodings. However, one of the problems that still persists is that training users is tedious and time consuming for users and we end with our research to make this as user friendly as possible. Hence, we propose our visualization driven training method where participants are trained using a visualization of activators that encode a certain symbol. To evaluate our proposed method, we performed a user study with 18 participants where we compared our visual based training method with a baseline. So as shown here in the slides, both methods used the audio stimulation which spelled the encoded symbol, tactile stimulation which stimulated the vibrotactile pattern that encodes the symbol and a visual stimulation where both methods differ. So in our visual based training, the activators that encode the symbol are visualized whereas in the baseline, the encoded character is printed on the screen. This baseline is a very common way of training participants and it's used in many studies before. We trained participants in four rounds of training. Overall participants were able to recognize symbols that were trained using visual based training significantly better than symbols that were trained using classical training. However, the larger difference seemed to appear in earlier rounds whereas in the last round of training there were no significant differences as the differences diminished with more rounds of training. Participants were able also to reconstruct the pattern of that encode the symbol significantly better in all the rounds combined as well as in the last round. Moreover, we performed tenacity elix at the end of the training and we found out that there were significant less workload in training when using our visual based training compared to the baseline. Participants also preferred our visual based training significantly more than the baseline. To summarize, this paper proposes and evaluates a visual oriented training approach for skin reading. Overall, participants will learn better with this method however the differences seem to be more prominent in the earlier round and they seem to vanish in later round. Nevertheless, this provides a steeper learning curve for participants. Also, participants experience less workload when training with this method and prefer much more than the baseline. Thank you for your attention and I invite you to read our paper for more details.