 فسألوا أهل الذكر إن كنتم لا تعلم الحمد لله رب العالمين والصلاة والسلام على من أرسله الله ورحمة للعالمين سيدنا ونبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه ومن تبيعهم بحسان إلى يوم الدين أما بعد المؤسسة التي أسألتها هو الجرح والتعديل هل جرح والتعديل يتبقى على جرح التعديل؟ جرح التعديل يتبقى على جرح التعديل أخينا يجب أن نفهم أن أقوال العلماء يتبقى على جرح التعديل جرح التعديل يتبقى على جرح التعديل يتبقى على جرح التعديل ويقوم بعمل المؤسسة والكردسة على مخلوقهم حيث يتبقى على جرح التعديل عندما يقول لك أنه يتبقى على جرح التعديل يمكن أن يكون right ويكون wrong كان هناك مقاومات فيه ومنذ صراعي فهي يقدمه على hearts of the devil ولكن القناة who does the H.T.H.H.H.H. Which is a great scholar who has reached the level he's allowed to do it if he gets it wrong لقد حصلت على that level he is allowed to do it if he gets it wrong مجورل he is rewarded for his striving and he has one reward for it but if he gets it right he has two but if he doesn't get it right and he gets it wrong he gets one reward and he is not sinning because the messenger said إذا حك بالحاكم if the person who is judging judges فجتاد and he strives ثم أخطأ but he gets it wrong فله أجرود he has one reward so what is he between he is either between one reward or two rewards so he is not sinning on him okay but there is a matter we need to keep in mind which is the original essence of the people of knowledge اهل العلم who have reached that level and who have reached that level and who have reached that level and who have reached that level and who have reached that level and who have reached that status of knowledge اه the essence of a person of knowledge is عد ليب وإلصاف that he is a just individual and that he is a person who would follow the text and nothing would take him out of following the religion correctly and no whims and desires or is in himself okay a scholar that's what we believe in of him originally but that doesn't mean اه that the scholar sometimes something may carry him but that thing that carries a scholar in order to criticise another scholar there has to be evidences that indicate that show it because as I said the original essence of the scholar is that he is a person who is just a person who is fair but if we see it and we sense that this matter is not based upon true point evidence but it's what لهوان there's a whim, there's desire in it هه مر بذا بيرحمة الله سلت he said رحمة الله تعالى and this is in his Kitab سيرعلا منه بلاء ذا بيرحمة الله سلت لسنا ندعي في عماة الجرح والتعديل العسمة من الغلط النادير pay attention and he said we won't claim that the scholars of جرح والتعديل that they have in them العسمة that they are infallible من الغلط from mistakes النادير which are rare ولا من الكلامي بنفس الحادين فيمن بينه بينه وبينهم شحناء وإحناء and we won't also claim for the people of جرح والتعديل that they are infallible from what speech which is based upon harshness and is due to شحناء they have something towards one another and he said we realize وقد عُلمة أن كثيرا من كلامي الأقراري and a lot of the times it has been known and documented that a lot of contemporaries مُهدر لعبرة به he tried to put the other one down where there is nothing really behind it there is no pure evidence that he supplied regarding that person he also said رحمه الله وكلام الأقراري بعضهم في بعض الله يُعبأوا به scholars who are contemporaries regarding one another that is not looked into it's not given consideration رغال إذا لا حلاك أنه لعداوة especially if it becomes a parent that is due to enmity اولي مدهب or because it's due to each one ascribes to a different مدهب اولي حسن or there's an indication to show you that there's حسن involved وما ينجو منه they have been said many people are saved from it إلا من عصامه الله except the person who Allah saves him from it وقد علم وما علمتو they have been said I do not know ونعصف من الأعصال that there was ever a time from the generation that came سلم أهلوه that the people were saved من ذلك that they were saved from this type of enmity or this grouping and this مدهب حسن towards one another he said I don't know an error where we can say this was safe that the people the scholars didn't have this in their hearts I don't know a time they ever come came by except he said except the prophets سدقين the truthful ones ولو شيطو he said if you wanted that he said لسرتو من ذلك كراريس لسرتو من ذلك كراريس if you wanted I can write books after that scrolls regarding to proof how many people did this إبرا عبدالبرحمه الله he said إلا من صحت عدالته anyone who becomes clear to us his reliability his justice becomes clear to us وثبتت وثبتت and he becomes also clear to us في العلم بأمانته his truthfulness in terms of knowledge وبانه ثقته and in fact he's a thقة it becomes clear to us in knowledge لما يلتفت we will not look at it and it should not be looked into إلا قول أحد the speech of a person إلا أياتي unless he comes with في جرحي in the criticism of this person بيبيلت كليقة evidence عا ديباتي which is just يصيح that can be that can be correct بيبا جراحه in which he criticized it for على طريق الشهادات in a way of witnessing ونعمل فيها من المشهادات المعينة it has to be a matter which eyes can see observation can't be matters like behind closed doors and it has to be كليقة and a lot of the time we hear youngsters who really don't have a lot of understanding who keep repeating the word الجرح مقدمون على التعديل that criticism takes presidents over praise and they keep repeating this and they think with due to the ignorance that this is at his generalization أنه على الإطلاق that this is just open like that but this is جهل عدم الإطلاع and it only comes from ignorance and not observing and studying rather there's another ruling and another principle which stands and each and every one of them have it scholars have رحمهم الله جميع they applied them both correctly so not you can't do إطلاق of any of the two the other one which is that the contemporaries that which they have said about one another is not taken into consideration and it's not narrated okay scholars have said that as well so this point that we have to understand is if the person doesn't come with and this is a تفصيل which is important to be looked into that is if the person who's criticizing this individual does not bring بجنة عديلة clear evidences which can be taken and considered and it's based on fairness and justness and this evidence is clear then we take it if not بقية عديلة to this person remains reliable we take his speech we won't look into yours and Imam تاجس سكي رحمة الله he said الحذر وكل الحمر warning the people everyone warned from this which is what انتفهم قاعدة that you understand the principle of the scholars الجرح مقدر على تعديل سكي say this and it's all على إطلاقها just like that in the open without giving any تفصيل and explanation you just take it like that but it's صوابي but the correct is سكي say this اتبت إمامة وعدالة وكثرة مادحوه وندر جارحوه anyone whose reliability becomes firm his Imam his Imam and the fact that he's an Imam becomes firm and the people who praise him are a lot and the ones who criticize you are very rare huh وكانت هناك and there's also an indication قريلة دالة على سمة الجرح من تأصب من هبي وغيره لم يلتفت إلى جرح and there's another clear evidence that also indicates that this is based this criticism is based upon مدهب or it's based upon what other means other reasons then the criticism is not given any look it's not given every any look it's not given any look he also said عرحي الله عرفنا أن الجانح لا يقبل منه جرح عرفناك come to make we've brought to your attention and we made you understand that the criticism is not accepted or the criticizer who's criticizing his criticism is not accepted وإن فسره even if he comes with جرح which is حسر it's not accepted في حق من غلبه عرفناك أن الجانح لا يقبل منه جرح وإن فسره even if he gives a detailed criticism is not looked at and it's not accepted في حق towards the right of whom من غلبه قاعته على معصياته the person whose obedience has overcome his disobedience وما يحوه and the people who have praised him are more على ذامه the ones who are criticizing him ومرز ومزكوه على جانحي and the praises the ones who praise them are more than the ones who criticize them إذا كانت هناك if there is what there is that challenge worldly challenge between the two كما يكونوا بين النظراء like it happens between the contemporaries أو غير ذلك or other than it وحينئي فلا يرتفد at that time we don't look into it such as what لكلامي الثوريو that which إمام مصوفيان the theory said and other than him which I said about بوحانيفا we don't give it a look ووأمي ذبن and what I said about إمام ماليك we don't look at it and what يحيب and that which إمام النسائي سالبا أحمد من صالح we also don't look at it all of those are examples he brought ولو أطلقنا تقديم الجرح if we if we generalize and we just open it على مصرعيها just like that that the جرح takes presence over the تعديل لما ساليمة لنا أحد nobody will be safe for us من الأئمة from the scholars from the aim nobody will be safe for us إذا من إمام because there is إمام إلا وقد طاعنا فيه طاعنون except that somebody criticized him وهلك فيه الهاليكون so brothers we have to understand this issue is what إذا قامت البيينة if Clicker Emirates comes to us العادينة which is just على خطائه this person's mistake أو عرض كلامه or that person's speech is taken and it's presented in front of the book of Allah and the Sunnah and his speech goes that person who's been criticized his speech goes against the Kitab and it goes against the Sunnah فإن القولة هو مردود then the person whose speech is criticized ولا يلزمه sorry if a person he becomes sorry إذا قامت البيينة if Clicker Emirates brings to us and shows us العادينة that is just على خطائه the mistake أو عرض كلامه or his speech is presented to the Kitab and the Sunnah and they go against it فإن القولة هو مردود that person's speech is rejected ولا يلزمه and it's not necessary حسب قواعد أهل العلم according to the principle of the people of knowledge and you better that that person that that this person is made a Muqtada أو لحكما بخروجه or that we take him out of أهل السنة بمجرد خطائه just because of that mistake we found in him we reject the mistake but that mistake automatically we don't say he's an innovator أو we don't place a ruling on him which we say you've left أهل السنة و الجماعة regarding matters which are what مسائل العلمية و العمالية بمجرد خطائه just because he done a mistake in what مسائل علمية المسائل عمالية فإن أصر على خطائه if the person is persistent upon his mistake أو بارد معصية أو his shortcoming has become very clear فالجرح المفصر now at this point مقدمه is given presidents على التعديل on the praise that was present on the praise that was present because he is persistent upon the mistake he chose not to come back from it as for if the person is ignorant about the matter أما إنجع إلى مراده as for if the person is ignorant about intent فينظروا في سيرة المجتهد we look at the سيرة of this individual المجتهد إن كانت حسنة إذا if it was a good life he lived حملة كلابه this speech of his that we have what do we do we take it we push it to a good interpretation good meaning because Allah said in the Quran والبلد طيبه the lad which is good يخرج الناب to be with the Lord who the lad which is good it brings out crops good crops the lad is good the crops are good with the permission of Allah وإن كانت سيرة تغير الناب but if his biography shows us that he was an evil person this speech of his that we have we will take it to the evils of meanings because Allah said والذي خبثا لا يخرج that which the lad which is corrupted does not bring except corruption because the person who has pasteurized me and the person whoulu time of mistakes we will take care to do it to a benefit those that are good send any torch to tell themها something important we gonna to dodge the meaning for that then maybe i should say Ming and God is great in the final