 Because through the critical discussion about European history you realize that Europe is not something enforced upon us but a request of ourselves means trade union, social movement, socialist movements and if that is the case then the present things we do not like that much in Europe can be changed as well. I think what we need mostly right now is a critical discussion on the European present but any discussion on the present will necessarily depend on some re-evaluation of the past. Let's say let's take the issue of the new fascism. Ideally function as a sort of antidote to the rise of populism and populism and I would say all populist movements have a strong nationalist core and as such our forces working for a disintegration of Europe and in particular the EU. Instead of this dubious code work framework of totalitarianism we have the vocabulary, we have the experience, we have the knowledge, we've been there, we've been in fascism, the contemporary rise of fascism is not so new and I think we can fall back on our experience in fighting the first fascism. First we need to call it this not totalitarianism which has a strong anti-communist dent which makes it impossible for us to understand why the Soviet Union took the pain to defeat the Nazis. So instead we can fall back on our very European tradition of anti-fascism from the interwar period and also post-war and that would be perfectly enough for us to combat the challenge. I probably would stress more this experience of colonialism which of course pertains not to all EU member states but to quite a number and that's why we need to when we speak critically about let's say issues of far-right violence it's impossible to understand this violence without going back to the to the imperial and colonial periods and European races and the history of European racism too. Not each but many in Europe have a colonial past but that is sort of exclusively part of their national history. It is not a transnational feature and in my perception as a historian of course it is transnational feature and I think that could be stressed in the exhibition. Yeah that is that Europe is a result of revolutionary democratic movement starting right in the 19th century with workers crossing all borders cooperating and particularly then in the 1920s when Europe was one of the main requests of socialist parties trade unions, peace movement, women's movement, reflecting itself in many congress resolutions in favor of building the United States of Europe but Europe was discussed also at local level and socialist trade unions started to cooperate practically building a socialist Europe, a trade union, a peoples Europe from the bottom. That I would very much like to be remembered maybe more than it is in the moment and in the museum.