 Fyng spineisio y r traddain o'r 11 ystod yn 2019 o'r Gwyl Gwyl Gerstd, Mae Gwyl Gwyl Gwyl Gwyl Gwyl Gwyl, mae hynny'r rel 50 yn iawn mai gyrraut Cymru oherwydd Aelon, oedden nhw dweud y cysylltu i'r Gwyl Gerstd i'r Aelon, cysylltu i'r Aelon i'r Cysylltu i'r Gwyl Gerstd i fy modest yng nghyddiad i'wДwylliannol i'r llwyddiad i ddechrau yn ei ddefnyddio ac yn ei ddefnyddio. Rwy'n dechrau i Gwyl Gerstd hynny. The second item is an instrument laid under the European Union Withdrawal Act 2018. We are looking at the scrutiny procedure and the categorisation applied by the Scottish Government. The instruments, the Town and Country Planning and Electricity Works, EU Exit Scotland, Miscellaneous Amendments, Regulations 2019, SSI 2019-80. Those regulations address deficiencies to ensure that EU-derived Town and Country Planning legislation relating to environmental impact assessments and hazardous substances continues to be operable and enforceable after the UK leaves the EU. It's been laid under the negative procedure and it's been categorised as of low significance. Our advisers indicate that the scrutiny procedure and categorisation could be appropriate. Is the committee content that the appropriate scrutiny procedure and categorisation has been applied? Continue. Thank you. Gender item 3 is an instrument subject to affirmative procedure. No points have been raised on the draft justice of the peace courts. Sheriffdom of South Strathglide, Dumfries and Galloway, etc. Amendment Order 2019. Is the committee content with this instrument? Contained. The fourth item of instruments subject to the negative procedure and the first is the Town and Country Planning SSI, which we've just considered under item 2 and which now have before us for technical scrutiny purposes. The instrument contains minor drafting issues relating to clarity of meaning in specific regulations. The Government's acknowledged these issues. Full details can be found in correspondence with the Government, which is included in our published papers. Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament under reporting ground H on account that the form of regulations 510C, 514AI and 611AI could be clearer? Agreed. As the drafting issues are minor and corrective action is not urgent, is the committee content with the Government's assurance that it intends to bring forward an amending instrument? Agreed. The next instrument is the Teacher's Superannuation and Pension Scheme Scotland Miscellaneous Amendment Regulations SSI 2019-95. This instrument makes provision to ensure that the current employer contribution rate of 17.2% will continue to apply to 31 August 2019 with a revised rate of 23% applying from 1st of September. The regulations were laid before the Parliament on 18 March and come into force on 1 April. This does not respect the requirement that at least 28 days should elaps between the laying of an instrument which is subject to the negative procedure and the coming into force of that instrument. The standing orders require the committee to draw to the Parliament's attention any failure to respect the 28-day laying requirement. The Scottish Government's reasons for not complying are set out in correspondence with the presiding officer, which is available in our published papers. Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground J as the regulations fail to reply with the requirements of section 28.2 of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform Scotland Act 2010? Is the committee content that the failure to comply with section 28 is acceptable in the circumstances? There is one other instrument to consider under this item. It is SSI 2019-96 and our advisers are not raised any points. Is the committee content with this instrument? Item 5, considering instruments, is not subject to any parliamentary procedure. Our advisers have not raised any points on SSIs 2019-92, 93 and 97. Is the committee content with these? Content. I will move the meeting into private.