 The slogan referring, among other things, or mainly to the fact that the activity is mainly social based on networks, communities, etc., rather than person to person. Do you think learning 2.0 supports inclusive lifelong learning? In the framework of the prevailing institutions, I think the answer is basically or most of the time negative, because I think the institution of formal education today, mainly primary and secondary education, to lesser extent higher education, are immune in a way to the impact of the Internet, and they have kept rejecting all the impact in the last 30 years, so there is no reason to believe that they will accept it now. So within their walls, I don't think they will make any change. Outside, there is a lot of inclusion and interaction going on, of course. My second question is, do you think isolated experiments in learning 2.0 can be mainstreamed in education? No, the reason I just mentioned the answer is no. As long as educational, well, there are few countries, like in Scandinavian countries or Holland, which have relatively open and flexible culture in general, and also the educational system is rather open naturally. So in case of the very few examples of open, not open in the sense of open education, but relatively open organizationally systems, experiments that have been done in a laboratory setting or artificial setting might be integrated. But most other educational systems, including in the big countries like the United States and most European countries, et cetera, are too rigid to allow it, they are hostile to it. And my last question is, actually, you probably just answered. Do you think learning 2.0 will ever fundamentally change educational landscapes? Well, I didn't answer it because if you think in the long term, let's say 10 to 15, 20 years from now, the power of the Internet and all the very deep changes, radical changes it brings with it to society will overcome the antagonism of educational systems. And the wall of educational systems will crumble in one way or another. But it hasn't happened until now. I was hoping all that it should happen, but it didn't, and it will happen sometimes in the future. I don't know why, when, it can be very sudden, like the fall of the Egyptian president, like the collapse of the Berlin Wall. I mean, it might be one of these kind of events, or it might take place gradually. I don't know, but I mean, eventually it will happen, but not in the near future. And let me just ask one more question. We talk a lot about target groups of inclusive education, inclusive distance learning. Do you think these target groups can be really reached in their variety and in their extent? What do you mean when you say we talk about target groups? The students or in terms of inclusive projects, the seniors, the dropouts from school, all those who don't have access to education, do you think they could be reached? I think that they can be reached, but again, it's not the question of technology. It's a question of the culture of the society. And I think societies that were open and inclusive to start with, again, like the Scandinavians, have done it without technology. And they will continue to do it, maybe better with technology, because there are very strong social economic powers at work, and technology by itself will not change, at least on it not in the short term. Thank you very much.