 So, ladies and gentlemen, first of all, I'm glad to be here. And in the following minutes, I would like to talk about the preliminary results that we gained through the investigation, through the integrated archeological investigation of two pits at Kokuj Turiamnaga to Middle Bronze Age site. If we try to think about the household archeology attempts to understand the life of priesthood people, we always see that usually what they are reaching for is the material culture and the buildings that they leave behind. However, we have to admit that there are other sources that can be really useful to reconstruct what they were producing and how they were managing it on site or off site. One of the main possibilities here is to sample anthropogenic sediment and try to gain some information through different bioarcheological and gearcheological methods. In this particular attempt, we were using factlet analysis and the classical macro botanical to carcological analysis to get some information about how Middle Bronze Age societies in the Vaca culture at Kokuj Turiamnaga used their site and what they were producing for aging. I'm not going to go very deep into the details regarding the site because there are a couple of presentations here dealing with it. But just a very short introduction, where we are geographically and in time, we are in the central part of the Carpathian basin, which is in the Middle Bronze Age, the Vaca culture occupation territory. And what we know that they had a highly developed settlement network based off different types of settlements, fortified, multi-layered tiles and hilt of settlements. And these are present at the western bank of the venue and in the other side on the eastern bank of the Great Hungarian Plain, we see the open air settlement form states and villages, which were probably more likely to be the places of agricultural protection. The site itself is extremely interesting. It's a three-parted settlement with three different clusters. The main nucleus, the main territory, is believed to give place to the houses and the household. And there are two other outer clusters, which were probably part of the agricultural production throughout the settlement. We have two trenches that were excavated in a part of a bigger project. They are situated in one of the outer clusters. And as you can see on the geophysical perspective, they had a very remarkable anomaly here. So it was quite easy to find. And they had a very interesting morphology as well. The first one is trench number eight. And based on the description that was done during excavation of the macromorphology of the soil of the trench profile, at least four phases could have been distinguished. And our task is now to either support this theory or reflect on what would have been the other way. So the lowest part, the bottom of the trench, was probably used for storage purposes. At least this is what was previously. While we have another collapsed, very heterogeneous layer complex, so to say, with macro layers, which is believed to be the result of the collapse and the natural soil erosion that occurred during the development of the pit itself. Above that, we see a very interesting complex structure, which is basically a complex of furs and ovens produced of plastered-out layers. And then we have a ceiling layer, which is, of course, the result of soil erosion that occurred in this site. Trench number 10 seems to be a little bit less complicated. At first, we have a homogeneous field of bones and organic material. And above that layer, which is extremely rich in broken bone fragments, pottery and grinding stone fragments. In order to get some minor information and some preliminary results about what could have been happening here and what was the evolution of these trenches, we had six and six samples. All analytical results are gained from the same samples, meaning that we have used samples for macro botanical analysis to get some information about seeds and fruit. And these were sub-sampled. And then five-lit analysis was conducted on these samples. At the current stage of the research, we do not have the C14 dates. I'm sorry, I cannot present it here. But we hope to receive it by the conference. But we did not. So we have to rely ourselves currently on the chronological assessment of the archaeology to find that we have here. The meaning of the integrated archaeological research is to select different types of indicators and try to compare them to different local human activities. And these imply serial storage, serial cleaning, the distinction between the cleaned crane and the serial byproducts, the food preparation processes or stages in the food preparation processes. The presence of building materials and even dunk storage. For this, we have selected different kind of indicators from the archaeological spectrum. So to say, we're looking mainly at serial remains and cleaning remains, which are very good information submitters of what kind of cereals were produced and about the know-how and technological level of harvesting and the plant cultivation. And then we have the very complicated named phytoliths. For us, the most important ones are related to different parts of the cereals. Because if they are present in our samples in the anthropogenic material, we can be fairly sure that that part of the plant was there, so after it was decomposed, they leave these phytolith signals behind. So very fast about the results. In trench 8, we see the presence of acorn, which is not very surprising in terms of Bronze Age in the Carpathian basin, because it is believed to be one of the most important cereals of that era. What you see, though, that there are no grains, just gloombases present. And we have a very, very low diversity and the amount of weeds, which is, again, pretty interesting. Because usually they come to, if they are not cleaned very, very backward, they usually come together. Now we have a trench 10, where besides the acorn, we have different barley. And again, the ratio between the grains and the gloombases, so the cleaning material is almost 50 to 50. And then we were lucky to find also lentil, because all these are also important pillars of Bronze Age food strategies. And then we have a higher amount and higher diversity of weeds. I would like to draw your attention to Placid Pemobilosum, which is a old post-ethnogram. It has a lot of other English and Hungarian names. This is a special weed, because currently in Hungary this is only found at three of three to five locations and extremely endangered species. And we constantly find this together with iron corn on Bronze Age and iron age sites. And it is believed that that does it be a real estate somehow attached to the agricultural production of iron corn. And it's infiltrated throughout time through the valley from the south to the north. There we have the results of the final analysis. For us, the most important ones are the so called dendritics, which represent the generative organs, so the dehusking activity that took place either close to the trench or somewhere else, but the cereal base was brought here. And then the indicators, which are for the vegetative organs, so they represent hay and straw. On a statistical basis, there is no real difference. There's no real distinction in the pigs. However, if we would like to go in some details on just the observations of the pigs, we see that there is some that can be some differentiation in between the hay and straw and the husk material. We have almost the same situation in the trench then. So this is what we see at the moment. I would like to put all this into a little context. What we see, what we know, based on the archaeological analysis of other pasture settlements, is that iron corn and barley and different kinds of tools, especially field wheat and lentil, are the main pillars of Bronze Age food strategies. And we found these, we have found these species and these plants at Bakustulia. And it has to be added that the low quantity of cartological remains is probably in connection with the very bad testimonial circumstances, since these sites were placed in a sandy and very dry environment. So we do not have those very favorable testimonial circumstances that could favor the survival of many more archaeological cartological remains. But in the other hand, fightwits are not affected with that, so they are there. So if we, again, get back to our trench and see what was happening, I try to summarize what we have seen in the results. We had a question, was it used for storage in our vision? It was not probably used for storage. Most probably it was used for discarding waste. This is underlined by the presence of most in the macro and in the micro record, the husk and the gloom base and all the other serial cleaning byproducts. The, still, we don't see very clearly about the big complex layer, complex in the second phase. What we know that there is a lack of macro remains. There is almost no fightwits in there. However, we have a very high organic matter and a very high micro charcoal content, which also could have some indication but at the moment we are not really sure what that could be. And then we have the place of food preparation, which is underlined not only by the presence of hearts and ovaries, but by the presence of barley grains and lentil seed. And also we have a good support from the micro parts as well. So this is how we could somehow reconstruct the life of this trench, at least on the data that we have at the moment. And we have a very similar situation here. Again, storage is questionable. It's more likely that these trenches were used consciously for depositing waste and not for storing any other material. Not for storing any other material. And since we don't have here any material remain of food preparation, we can be fairly sure that this was used throughout its life as a waste deposit in the waste pit. Thank you for your kind attention.