 Please subscribe to this YouTube channel mentor. Talk can do, press bell button for notifications. You know, as reported in a section of media, more than 50,000 people have illegally crossed the Canada-U.S. border to file refugee claims over the past four years, walking over ditches and on empty roads along the world's longest undefended border. Canada and the U.S. entered into a bilateral pact to deal with this situation. The bilateral pact known as the Safe Third Country Agreement, which required the asylum seekers trying to enter Canada through the U.S. border to first seek refuge and asylum in the United States so that first they could be vetted and dealt with by strict American immigration laws. However, the bilateral pact has gone into a muddle recently when a Canadian federal court struck down this bilateral pact between the United States and Canada by declaring the same as invalid. The court has ruled that this prerequisite and the U.S. immigration detention sort of violates the human rights of the asylum seekers. So that became the ground of declaring the STCA as an invalid pact. The refugees who were pushed back at the Canadian border contested the STCA on the ground that the United States does not qualify as a safe country under the current establishment or under the current regime. The federal court of Canada declared that the agreement was in contravention and breach of a provision of a Canadian Charter of Rights which obligates the laws and state actions that interfere with life, liberty and security to correspond to the principles of fundamental justice. However, the court verdict stands suspended by the judge for six months to give Parliament, the Canadian Parliament an opportunity to respond. The agreement obviously shall remain in force during this suspension because the agreement has not been stayed. The verdict has been suspended. The federal court decisions can be appealed to the federal court of appeal and to the Supreme Court. Let's see what happens next.