 Okay, thank you. So I'm not sure how many of the persons' only questions I'm going to address. Certainly in 15 minutes. If I don't get to do more than one or two of my excuses, I think I came from the other half of the session which was organised. But there will be a connection between what I'm talking about and what the person's just been talking about. Particularly around fair data. yn goio i fed yn ei gyddion hyn o'r cyflwydu o'r cyfledd y dyfodol yn y cyfledd yn digital, yn y defnyddio y gallu, yn 20 gynhyrch o'r cyflwydu digital, dwi'n drwy cyflwydu digital yn cyfiwyr o'r cyflwydiad cyflwydu sydd wedi'n ysgrifennu bod ni'n gofio'r cyflwydu i'r cyfrownau gwahanol ym d грindodau. A yna, ysgrifennu cerdd ydy o'r cyfrwyddiad o ddeithasio i chi ei ddweud o gwisod o bod ymddangos o amser infrasurthinkaholau bydd eich cynllun i ddisigio cael ei gwybodaeth gael gwybod i'w bwysig. Fod ar gyfer y gallai fi yn gweld yn enyngor iawn, dwi'n dysgu am y pan hwnnw o bethau gweld yn y digwydd a wneud bod hynny a fors yn ddweud yn eu gyfathau bod rhywun yn edrychwyr. So hyn ydw i'n ceisio maen nhw, rhawn i'n bwy nifer o gweithio'r ddweud, ac ydych chi'n defnyddio eu gennych yn rheswm yn brosiecti felly yn gyda'r hyn byw, mae nhw'n credu bod y Byllglwyr yw'r cwmysudon fel y cyfnod o'r ffagor y Lodin Sain, ond yn Gwmp Llywodraeth Llywodraeth i'r lleol, fel ddigon darnod, a llwynturd yr argynному. Cyndd yn bryd yma i chi'n galw amdano, ac rwy'n credu'n bwyd mwy ffall�i. Rhaid yr oeddeniaeth sydd ei wneud drwy sefydlu sy'n gweld eisiau am oed bethau sydd gennym newydd bwysigol, sicrhau'r hynny yn ei ffrindio'r rhanau gwahanol neu'r cyfor, ac wrth gwrs, mae'r cyfrindio'r cyfrindio fyddai â hynny'n yw hormoddiol yn ymgylchedd ac yw'n cyffredinol yn allan i'ch beth sy'n eich rhan oherwydd mae'r ffordd not just that they're accessible now but will be accessible into the future and you know the terms and conditions that you can use them under that they need to be interoperable. It's no good to have lots of data silos, you need to be able to search across data sets. It's very well exemplified by the MISMA initiative and they also need to be in format that they can be reusable for future research. That is the ideal. Now what is most archaeological data like? Now that I owe this to Isto Huwbiler who gave a paper at the CDH conference in Leiden in 2017 entitled Being Fair when Archaeological Information is Means. He thought that most archaeological data is miscellaneous, exceptional, arbitrary and non-conformist. So we've got some way to go, I think Isto Huwbiler is right, we've got some way to go to make our data fair but there is a lot of help available to do that. There is a risk that fair is just a platitude and that everyone now sites, our data will be fair in their research grant application to tick the box. There is much more to it than just a box ticking exercise and we need to think particularly about the impact of the fair principles upon archaeological data and what it implies for our own discipline. There are some useful guidelines coming out in the sector. I will particularly highlight these guidelines from the Parthenus project which I think largely the work of Dan Stee, the Netherlands Data Archive on guidelines to verify your data management. I'm not going to go into them, they're downloadable from the web they've been translated into multiple languages you can find on the Parthenus website but they went through 20 guidelines you say to verify data management and make data reusable particularly from a heritage perspective. Fair is being quoted by large numbers of European initiatives in heritage and much more broadly. The most relevant one to heritage that I'll say a bit more about is Ariadne Plus, the follow-on from Ariadne and a quick plug for a book published in fact yesterday, the Ariadne Impact. It's available, there's a specimen copy on the Aqualunga Bookstore on floor 5 but it will be available as an open access monograph online in probably about a month's time downloadable from the Ariadne website and a lot of the papers in that book provided by a variety of heritage partners are about the fair principles and their application in their own areas. But Ariadne Plus sits within a larger framework of infrastructures. ERIS is in the preparatory phase of being set up as a European research infrastructure part of the S3 framework specifically for heritage science and then that sits within, there's hierarchies upon hierarchies within these things but it sits within a thing called SHOCK which is the social sciences and humanities open cloud which brings together a lot of the larger infrastructures such as Dario, you may have come across the arts and humanities that says the social sciences clarion and the linguistic. These are all data infrastructures bringing together data across Europe and beyond and SHOCK in turn is working closely with this thing EOS, the European open science cloud. So archaeology is just a small area in that but we can influence it, we can contribute to it, we're a community within that. Say a bit more if I have time about each of these. So ERIS is based on the concept of four types of laboratories what it called which are the areas that need to support heritage science research. So the large-scale permanent facilities like the radiocarbon dating labs, Fix Lab, there's Mo Lab for mobile laboratories which travel around the country and bring instrumentation too. Then there's ARC Lab which are the scientific archives including reference collections and then Digi Lab which is where Ariadne Plus and other initiatives come in which is a virtual laboratory. It's large and bringing data sets together but there is a sort of fixed element of that with our performance computing as well. So Digi Lab is about digital data and tools, that virtual access to scientific data, particularly concerning the tangible heritage. ABS has a particular role within ERIS in looking at two areas and unfortunately you can't escape things like financial aspects of data management. We say there under the definition of this particular task heritage data are potentially very large, they're collected in a wide variety of formats, they're often born digital. They are valued for future research, they need to be preserved but that can lead to significant long-term costs and that's often not considered. So one of the things that we are doing as part of that work package is writing recommendations, reviewing the different cost models that exist for digital archiving and that's something that's been taken up. I said I wouldn't have time to mention this in the presentation but I can mention the CERDA cost action which we're also involved in which is saving European archaeology from a digital data dark age and there we're also looking at this issue of how do you set up a digital archive and how do you look at the cost of that. But then we're also looking at particularly aspects of data curation for the heritage science area, data quality assurance, the life cycle, data management and preservation, particularly looking at the quite special, unique types of data produced in heritage science. So moving rapidly on to shock, as its subtitle suggests this is particularly looking at how the social sciences of the humanities fit into the European open science cloud. And ADS is in there representing really area of any plus but representing more broadly the archaeological research community as one quite well developed research community in its use of digital data and so we're informing the development of shock policies in terms of what are the user needs of the archaeological community. And there are other groups involved as you might be able to see some of the logos there but another group for example the National Gallery in the UK are representing another sort of heritage related user community. But shock also makes extensive reference to these fair principles which cover the whole data life cycle from the initial concept and collection through the processing, distribution, discovery and then analysis and there should really be a circle going round there back to the beginning. And shock as I mentioned sits within this broader European concept of the European open science cloud and brings together these infrastructures in what it has this concept of a marketplace, putting users in touch with services, putting them in touch with tools that they can use to analyse their data, making them aware of training courses that are available to help them reuse data and I scattered a few flyers on the table about opportunities for training courses within area of any plus and transnational access of the flyers and about that. These are available to apply for and you don't have to pay to go on them even better. You receive money to go on them so look out for the calls just being announced. So that sort of fits in within this broader marketplace of opportunities here and again particularly in there is a game focused on the sort of heritage science area and some of the specific accessibility and interoperability issues there. And trying to think about the differences that exist in different parts of Europe as well and beyond in terms of the difficulties of making data fair and I mentioned there some examples about the difference in the legal protection systems. So we're going to be talking later on papers about access to publicly collected data about metal detected data, which of course is a really interesting issue in Europe and some countries it's illegal and others it's a major source of research data. So it's how we reconcile those in the context of European infrastructure is quite challenging. So those are the sorts of issues that we're thinking about there. So last but not least plug for Ariadne Plus which is just kicked off this year where we are trying to provide a lead for the archaeological partners and bridging the link between the archaeologists and the information scientists. Ariadne Plus, if you're familiar with Ariadne that had partial European coverage, we're trying to extend to cover most of Europe now and also to cover, we're going to be hearing from our Argentinian partners at the end of this session when we're going to cover Argentina, Japan and the United States to make those international links there. But we're also extending thematically in terms of chronological coverage, but also in different areas of archaeology that are being covered, particularly in the science area, bioarchaeology, environmental archaeology and archaeometallogy, dating etc etc. And we've set up a number of special interest groups that mentioned there very briefly. I think this presentation is being recorded so you can review there the partners that are leading those and it's an opportunity then to get involved and to participate in some of those task groups if you've got interest in making data fair in those areas working through those sub tasks. So Ariadne Plus is a number of particular things that we're doing with regard to fair data, we've been a practice gap in archaeological data management. We're going to be providing over the next four years a number of policy support tools specifically focused on the archaeological community, a data management plan, a template, a protocol for our domain, a policy wizard according to which country you're working in. It will guide you to the policies that are online, whether they're ADS for the UK or England, some aspects of that, or whether they're Swedish national policies or the Netherlands once and so forth. And then what we're calling a standardisation wizard for documenting major standards in the archaeological domain and the various authority files and the sawrines and so forth. We're also going to be providing guidelines on creating repositories for those countries that are trying to develop them, manage those, how you do quality control, how you get the core trust seal for example, which is the sort of comic mark that digital repositories aspire to, and how you manage your fair data thinking about issues of IPR and providing training. Thank you for listening.