 This paper reviews existing measures of research collaboration quality and outcomes focusing on those that are applicable to clinical care, education and program delivery. The authors found that most measures of collaboration quality have reliability and some form of statistical validity, but few measures have been tested in multiple settings. Additionally, many measures focus on group dynamics rather than individual contributions. Finally, most measures do not define how counts were delimited, obtained or assessed for reliability. The authors suggest that future measures should be developed and tested in multiple settings, should include individual contributions, and should define how counts were delimited, obtained and assessed for reliability. This article was authored by Beth Betigs, Dorian Miller, Catherine M. Dudding and others.