 Yes, so good morning. I am here to present the INSAO Iniciativa de Monitoreos Sociecológico de la Massonio Occidental, Western Amazon Sentinel Landscape. It's even bigger than the Nicaragua Honduras Sentinel Landscape. It's 40 million hectare. It's at the border across three important Amazon countries. There is Brazil, Peru and Bolivia. Most of the land is forested for about 70%. Most of the forest is actually occupied by productive forest concession and concession for non-timber forest products, conservation and increasingly for ecotourism. The agricultural landscape Mosaic includes a variety of land units, mostly the graded pasture land and area of fallows are dominant in the matrix. And in some of the region composing the landscape we also have expanding commodity crops, mostly Inukayali. We have oil ponds and cacao that are increasingly important. There are three main socio-ecologic contexts. The areas that are along the rivers that are mostly populated by indigenous communities, practising shifting cultivation and the harvesting of timber and non-timber forest products and the Riberinos and mestizos groups. And then we have settlements along the road that are mostly inhabited by colonists and these are the groups that are most involved in the production of commodities and livestock. And then we have intensive peri-urban agriculture around the main centres of Pucalpa, of Puerto Maldonado and Cobia. So, yeah, we have contrasting growth paths across the different regions. For example, Inukayali that is one of the two regions of Peru. We had an important growth over the last years, mostly related to hydropower. Agriculture is not the most important sector in these regions. For example, Inukayali is now hydropower and market and services are growingly important. But agriculture is also growing, mostly because of the expansion of oil ponds. And then we have regions like, for example, Madre de Dios where we have, that is experiencing an economical decline related to the crisis in the mining sector. We can observe that there is a sort of explosion of the urban centre and particularly Pucalpa that is the capital of the department of Inukayali and the rapid development of transport infrastructure. Illegal activities are a main driver of forest loss and degradation, in particular the production of coca leaves, both in Inukayali and increasingly in Pando. And then the illegal gold mining activities in Madre de Dios. Land management conflicts are reported in all the regions, mostly due to overlapping rights, encroachment of migrants into indigenous land, illegal land titling processes. And then we have this issue of absentee landlords that is also related to this urbanization pattern. And this is what we are experiencing right now doing the surveys. We don't find the people in the villages. There is the house but people are living in town or even in Lima, but they maintain the land. So there is a mosaic of people and the mosaic of livelihood strategies and the mosaic of value chain that connect these people to national, to local national and international levels. And this is probably the main challenge for the landscape. It's not about poverty, it's about governing the dynamics of this landscape that is changing very, very fast. So one of the things for which we think that sentient landscape approach and that an integrated approach is important is this possibility of looking at scales at an horizontal level, so for example to look at rural urban connection and also across the different levels. And this I think is our added value and this is also what is considered important by our partners. The contribution of the sentient landscape is to understand and test methodology to characterize local context. So this place-based research that also Anya mentioned within national and global frameworks and to understand and especially describe the couple degradation and recovery processes in these landscapes that as I said there are, in particular the post deforestation landscape that are dominated by pastures and degraded land often without people really living on it. And then to demonstrate the role of current combination of cross-scale, cross-level interaction over the dynamics that are observed. And so in terms of the platform for research and development we have a series of partners that also the way in which we look at partnership corresponds to the way in which we look at our possible impact. And we have three different types of partners. We have research partners, we have policy partners and then we have NGO and development partners. And these different groups of partners operate at different levels. So we have local regional partners that are mostly the University, University of Uqayali of Madre de Dios. We have the National Research Institution and Yap is our main partner. They are the ones that are actually implementing the data collection in Peru. And then we have in collaboration with INEA and then we have more sort of regional level partners so that our partners that work in the region in the various countries. And we have the regional government and the Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture of Peru that are very interested in looking at what we are doing especially in terms of restoration. And then we have as partner FAO and IFRI as Ania mentioned and CHESVI which is an NGO that is working across the borders and that is now implementing the Sentinel landscape framework in Bolivia. So the outcome is that these partners adopt a different approach to identify, manage and regulate and foster local change path for production and ecosystem services provision. And this I think is something that we can already see that for example, FAO wants to link up with us and we have already been invited to be members of a platform to understand land cover changes and how to describe all the fallow, rotation and land uses trajectories outside the forest borders. Of course the Ministry of Environment and Agriculture that are quite interested in the way in which we look at integrated patterns across places and scale. So in terms of potential for cross FDA and CRP work of course it is a bit obvious that's also why they were selected. There is a wide diversity of sites that can be used for Flagship 1, Flagship 3 activities. There is a high potential for Flagship 2 in the context of forest management and genetic both for natural and restored sector and Flagship 4 is already quite active through bilateral projects mostly on red governance both from the aircraft and seaport side with tenure and gender as cross cutting issues. There is the collocation with the oil palm sent to the landscape. I think Pablo will present that later. We have some work on cacao certification connection with PIM, a project with CCAP that will start next year on low emission development strategies across scales. And then this other pilot project that Anya mentioned with IUCN that's in terms of bilateral that is another block that an extra block that we are adding in the region of Ucaiali to work on restoration of the graded smallholder landscape. I think that's all. And thank you. The data, we also have an updated portfolio about all the data and things. If you are interested, I can share it with you but I thought it was more important to give you an idea of the context.