 Ronnie, that's because a lot of math geniuses can't teach and they assume all the complex parts are simple. To a certain degree, yeah. But I don't think math geniuses need to teach. The requirement, the quintessential requirement for teaching anything is love. As Krishna Murthy would say, you don't need math geniuses to teach high school mathematics, okay, or elementary school mathematics or even university level mathematics, the first two, three years. Anyway, I'm not a math genius, right? I don't even consider myself a mathematician. I just know how to use mathematics, the language of mathematics, to do what I need to get done. And a lot of that is because I was self-taught, right? I got my bachelors in geophysics at a minor in mathematics, but I really didn't understand mathematics until I started teaching it. And what made me understand mathematics, why we did certain things? Because my students would say, why do you do this? I go, well, because it's the way it's done. I didn't know why we did it. And I started looking up the whys. That was the love in me trying to make sure the student understood how to do mathematics that allowed me to learn mathematics to the level that I was comfortable with teaching, right? So you don't need to be a math genius or genius in anything to teach a certain topic. You have to have love to teach it, right? For the subject preferably, as well as the student, right? Because when you're asked a question and you don't know the answer, you can't dismiss that question, right? That means you're dismissing a student. That shuts them off right away, right? You need to seek out the answer so you can answer that question. And that's a love of learning because as soon as you try to seek out the answer for the question that you didn't have an answer for, you're going down a path of self-educating yourself, right? So it makes you more powerful. And that's what it did with me. It made my mathematics more powerful. So I'm not a math genius. I'm just someone that gives a rat's ass.