 I'm fairly evangelical around Compellent, and I always say I made two mistakes with Compellent. One is they tried to talk me out of buying less 15k SaaS disks, you know, you don't need this. Your status is going to work for you. Our algorithm does work, and we're like, no, no, no, let me just go ahead and make sure I got enough spindles and enough speed. So my first mistake was buying too many drives. I really didn't need them. Now that was a mistake, but they were right. My second mistake was not listening to the first mistake, right? But you know, they're fluid data, the fluid data progression really works well. And I would say, you know, for 99% of my data, whether it's my ERP system or file data, this Compellent does what it's supposed to do without my interaction with it. So combining all those resources, I happen to use SSDs as well. Yeah, and so by having that smaller, it's a much smaller tier as far as capacity, but by having that option for extremely low latency, extremely high IOPS, and allowing the algorithm to do its work effectively, I feel comfortable now in migrating everything to Compellent, migrating everything to basically the same SAN. I have all the IOPS and latency issues kind of resolved at the moment. So, Jack, do you envision, and maybe you're moving in this direction already, sort of two tiers, so tier zero SSD flash and then a bit bucket, tier three SATA? You know, it's all about cost, right? If everything was the same price, we'd all do SSDs, right? And so that's the whole point for tiered storage. It's cost per megabyte or per gigabyte or per terabyte right now. And so I see, we're still going to stay on the three tiers, but of course as the price of SSD is going down, everybody's been waiting for this for years. For us, it has been a lifesaver moving to SSD. I think we have one of the use cases to where, we don't have extremely high IOPS, but we have extremely high latency due to some of our legacy file applications and ERP applications. So we were having some pretty critical performance issues in some areas where SSD was the answer at even a high price point. That's been a consistent theme that I've heard from a lot of customers this weekend and elsewhere. Yeah, absolutely. I think we're going to see a consistent trend of more SSD use. We're going to see the two tiered systems move to three tiered as they adopt SSD. We saw a sharp rise this year just with the lower cost of SSD and I think that trend's going to continue. So as the cost of these resources comes down, we'll see more customers deploying and realizing the benefits, right? Like you said, Jack, lower latency is one of the key reasons, but there's a small minority of data that really needs that highest performance, lowest latency. But I think you're going to see the three tiered architecture because there's still going to be a majority of that data that would reside on those 15K spindles. We'd call that the tier two today, right? So I think what we'll find is as the cost goes down, tier two may start to disappear, but over the next year or two, I think we'll still see more of a three tiered architecture.