 Do I have a second motion and a second for approval of a minutes from our previous meeting? Are there any additions or subtractions? Hearing none all those in favor of the motion as stated signify by saying aye Sure votes aye motion passes And actually we have to back up because I forgot to call roll And we can do that right now We'll start with Alderman Bowman Alderman Berg Alderman Monay Alderman Doyle is excused Alderman Graf Alderman Manny Alderman Montemayor Alderman Moody Alderman Perez Alderman Rheinfleisch Alderman Stefan is excused Alderman Vanakka Alderman Van der Wille Alderman Wangerman excused And Alderman Wehringer We have a quorum On that the first item on our agenda tonight is Blue Harbor a status report the presentation will be by Paulette Enders director of planning and development and Steve Salkowalski City Planner regarding the precise implementation plan for the Blue Harbor resort What I have on that is just a brief opening comment. I'd like to welcome everybody for attending this evening Tonight's meeting was called to provide the Common Council with the latest information and status of the South Pier district development specifically the Blue Harbor resort It is hoped that through informational meetings such as this the Common Council will better Be informed and also be able to make better decisions and better table better able to answer questions from their constituents Paulette Enders our director of planning and development along with Steve Salkowalski our city planner Will tell us about the precise implementation plan and what it entails when they are finished the council will be able to ask questions pertaining to the plan After the question period we'll hear from our city attorney Steve McLean regarding the status of our contract with Great Lakes the developer of the Blue Harbor resort on that Paulette you are ready Okay, I don't know is that working all right what I'm going to start I don't know if it is working, but what I'm going to start off by saying is that As Mike Warner mentioned Steve Salkowalski, and I will be giving an update on the planning process that the city has been going through as well as Great Lakes and Several weeks ago at the plan commission meeting Great Lakes was approved as far as the planned unit development process which included a General development plan and a precise implementation plan and then after Steve Salkowalski gives that update Then what I'll do is I'll tell you I'll give you a little bit of information on where the city's at as far as the work That we've been doing with Smith group JJR on the master plan for South Pier, so I'll turn it over to Steve Good evening. We're gonna get it in here All right as everyone knows we've been working hard many of us on this Development with Great Lakes and recently they did go through the plan unit development as far as actually getting On an approval to construct the project that's been described to everyone You do on your packet did packets did receive a copy of the precise Implementation plan that you can have before you as well as a copy of The table of contents that shows some elevations shows floor plans Shows some guidelines that you can all take a look at and ask any questions whenever you feel Pretty much just so everyone understands South Pier right now is zone pre-plan unit development And that really doesn't allow for any types of formal uses Until an applicant comes in and makes an application to do some development on the island itself At that point in time what a person will do is come in for a pre Pre-application conference will speak to them will get their ideas see what type of Process going to be involved. Let them know that here's you're at step a and here's how you get to step z The first step was basically that the plan commission initiated the PED process They approved the initiated the PED process on January 28th of this year and they also approved the The pre-application conference as well as just the concept plan just at that point in time things were just like here's what we think We're doing they gave us some information. We started got the ball rolling Then the next step was called the general development plan And that was one of the land use processes that came before the council in terms of actually changing the zoning from pre-plan unit development to actually It's called plan south pier PUD 2003-1 so at that point in time what we did was we took it to the plan commission It was still in a conceptual general development type stage But at that point in time what you're doing is you're rezoning the property from pre-plan unit development to the actual zoning That allows for the development to occur The fourth step is what you have before you this evening, which was called the precise implementation plan Which was recently approved by the plan commission on June 3rd of well last week and And so there were some things I think our initial Precise implementation plan hearing was on May 27th, and there were a couple of items that had not been addressed I'm sure many of you heard the aspect that it wasn't in color and that wasn't in color and that was one of the issues But there were other issues such as landscaping Parking signage there are more issues than just the drawings being in color and but that being said that was one of the Things that didn't need to come in on June 3rd a lot of that information did come in You have the plan that's before you this evening that is the plan that was approved along with the drawings and That's where we sit this evening, and if anyone has anything specific Out of the plan itself. I'd be more to have more than happy to answer any questions with regards to that Thank You mr. Chairman Can you explain I I don't quite get it has there been any major change at all and in the Or is it just minor changes? Yes So if there haven't been many changes from the general development plan, which we've seen you know throughout the process I'd say probably one of the biggest things that occurred was maybe the aspect that there are going to be some Water slides that are going to extend out onto the east side of the facility looking towards the lake actually protruding the egg wall and going out of the facility Supposed to provide the Person in the water slide a little bit of More enjoyment or whatever you'd like to say But it also attracts people and letting people know what's happening in that section of the building But that's probably the major change if any. Thank you Steve. Thank you very much Paul what and as I explained before what you what we're going to talk about two things would be the Great Lake Approval process and then also what the city's been going through on the master planning process I think what many of you are aware of is the the concept plan for South Pier that hasn't changed and the companion to that that we've been working on are the guidelines and These have been Kind of I think there was a draft that was presented. They were changed not Substantially, but they were tweaked here and there and so this is the final document that you have in front of you We'll be having this printed up But we thought we would get this out to the council before we do that so as you go through it You'll see that in the beginning We have the design principles that were worked on when we worked on the concept plan The character zones that talk about the riverfront area The family resort area, which would be the Great Lakes project area and then also the lake front And then we go through the design guidelines and talk about each one of those character zones And the riverfront zone would include the shanties and then we get into the architectural character of the shanties How we would treat those as far as building materials and the building edge condition we get into building signage surface parking areas service areas landscape standards and Then those go in public realm enhancements and that gets carried through the entire document for each one of the character zones So we go through the same thing for that the live work zone, which would be and with that interior area Which would include the lofts? And then we continue on to the family resort area, which would be called the dunes and Then we end with the lakefront zone or the beach area we also have some Think towards the end we talk about the review process that Other applicants would go through just like Great Lakes did so that once we start moving on and Marketing the remainder of the peninsula. This will be a good tool for them to use Any questions? Thank you. Thank you, Paul it on that Hearing being no further questions from the council will proceed to item number four, which is an update by city attorney Steve McLean Thank You mr. Chairman to preface my remarks and my assistant were out at the attending the municipal attorneys Institute to Put on by the League of Wisconsin municipalities in Green Lake last week from Wednesday through Friday, so I had to do some catching up today as well, but made some pretty good progress and I'll try to give you the best I can where we are on the status of documents and agreements and Kind of where we're going My understanding we received a copy of a financing commitment From Great Lakes lender to Great Lakes late last week There are a number of contingencies in there Just as there are a number of contingencies in our development agreement that Which Which means that While it's a financing commitment from a lender There's still a lot of hoops that Great Lakes has to jump through before they can actually get the loan, but at least they've been spelled out and Basically agreed to there are a couple of relatively minor items in there that Relate to the city and the city's relationship to the lender that Still have to be worked out with the lender but We're hopeful those can be worked out in the next couple of days the developers also working on A public equity offering for for part of its equity for the project that's in the works That'll take some time to actually Sell those equity interests, but they're in the process of Working on the sales documents as I understand it On tonight's council agenda, there are a number of draft documents That are the sub documents to the development agreement that we've Talked about over the months the convention center operating lease Resort ground lease the condominium ground lease There's a restrictive covenants and cross easements agreement and a reimbursement agreement Those are being submitted tonight Just to get them in as council documents It's it's our hope that Will be acting on those or or have them presented for action by the council in the near future Exactly one is Not firmly established yet I Guess the best date we've got Currently is a closing for June 30th How realistic that is I'm not sure But that's the date we're using right now and that June 30th date for the closing would mean that the council would need to act and the redevelopment authority would need to act on These documents prior to during June 30th, and that's that's two Mondays from now so We're not sure When we'll schedule a special council meeting or if we will before then But it's possible that one will be set could be next Monday I guess we were hoping to get some idea of a better date this late this afternoon, but I really don't have a better date for you, but Very soon down the road There will be on the council for for action Final versions of these various documents Now there's another document that goes along with this the inter creditor agreement between us and the developers lender that the developers lender is preparing that we don't we haven't seen yet, so That isn't in the packet with the documents that are being submitted tonight One issue that came up late last week and We've placed it on the agenda for tonight's council meeting also and I think I could hand it out for discussion with the committee the whole here, so you get some idea of it and Just for informational purposes is a request by the developer to get on the site prior to closing prior to actually signing all the documents and Getting the loan moneys and and so forth I Should say this is in draft form, but I'll go through it a little bit without reading the whole thing What this is is if it were executed by both the city and the redevelopment authority be permission for Great Lakes and their contractor to Move on to the site not necessarily to start construction, but to do some preliminary work do some staking Mobilize their trailers and perhaps Start moving some of the fill dirt that's on the south pier over to the site that works going to be Needing to be done Regardless of this whether this project goes through or not But the developers basically asking the city to give it permission to go on site prior to Finalizing all the documents The the last two pages are Some dialogue back and forth Actually, it's just one-sided, but it's in reference to comments by Great Lakes on some of the provisions in this draft that At least at this point the staff And our outside council are recommending we make changes to basically we're Gonna recommend making the changes that they request in the on the last page But also a couple others that aren't in the document yet one would be a Cut-off date for this permission to be June 30th so that The permission would end there if nothing else happened if there weren't weren't any extensions or if there weren't Approval of the development agreement so that we couldn't have a total just open-ended thing that they'd keep staying on the site without a finalized development agreement And we're also requesting it's it is in here a Certificate of insurance which we have not received yet But the developer says that they're they'll be willing to provide The the early start agreement Basically doesn't obligate the city or the redevelopment authority to anything it says That We tell the developer that the agreement isn't final if it doesn't become final for whatever reason Your people on site aren't getting any money from the city, so they've got to know that and You'd have to get off the site and whatever left there is there and Be no obligation on the part of the city or the redevelopment authority to go forward It's hoped at the council meeting following this that Or at least the request will be for the council to authorize the mayor to execute this letter as as amended and we're We're scheduled to redevelopment authority meeting for tomorrow afternoon to have the redevelopment authority act on this as well you recall the The whole 40-acre parcel is owned by the redevelopment authority as opposed to the city city doesn't own the land but City controls the purse strings and has a lot to say and as far as the development proceeding I don't know if anybody has any questions on that I Apologize to Alderman Benet that the document that's on the council agenda I brought in under his name without talking to him in advance but I brought it in under his name because he's the Aldermanic representative on the redevelopment authority and We have kind of a short time frame to get this document in for the council tonight The the document that is on the council agenda is on the amended Portion of the agenda it's document 6-66 When when we get to the council meeting If I could I had one question is that pretty typical to do something like that All of them get on the property ahead of time it seems to me we done that somewhere in the past for another project We call exactly which one there are other projects that aren't Nearly as big as this where we've done it on a more informal basis. I think There may have been one where Well, there there are a number where Like in the industrial park in the business park where the developer started to Digging excavating for the foundations or something before something's been finalized so It's not unprecedented that we Agree to some early start. This obviously is a bigger project. There's more at stake, you know, if They started on the site and for whatever reason the development agreement doesn't get executed So this this is a little more formal letter that provides more definition to what's going on and the relationship of the parties so that there's no misunderstandings once they're on the site that That they have some impression that they're there to stay and they have the right to be there That's about all I can think of as far as update as far as the development agreement itself. That's still I Haven't I Didn't download it on my email today yet when I got back, but there's a version 17 that's on my on my computer I Trying to think which version it was that the council last Acted on it seems to me it's version 14. So there have been some minor changes. I Really haven't looked at the latest changes. I've had some discussions on some of them I think they're fairly minor non-subsid of we're down to Really fine-tuning or tweaking The the basic document that really hasn't changed substantially There's one bit of good news as I understand the commitment letter from the developer from the lender is for 29,500 dollars when originally they were talking about owning the developer $28 million so and it's my understanding that it's higher than that because the The offering by the slender was pretty well received with their With their clientele and their customers so they were able to borrow more money for the project and That's an indication that I guess they feel that the project is worthy enough to lend more money than they originally anticipated. So that's That's positive I'll try to keep you Like I said before may have to schedule a special council meeting sometime between now and the 30th of June and unfortunately, we're not in a position to say when that's going to be yet or if it will be but We'll try to do that as soon as possible and I'm sure the mayor will talk to the aldermen as far as if there's Problems with scheduling since we're getting into vacation schedules and things and it gets harder for big groups to Meet You have any questions on what I presented. I'll be happy to answer any questions. I Think I think you Steve I guess I would say everybody try to keep the next Monday night open That's a good possibility. So just kind of put a little mark on your calendar on there any questions Thank You mr. Chairman with respect to this letter here Steve We've come a long ways with this thing and pretty much winding it down. I Like the at-risk clause there in the end the fact that we're we're asking for insurance and the Termination date I think is important because it obviously can't be open-ended. They need to have some termination date and the joint in several Liability I think there are good clauses to have there. I did have a question though with respect to the To the hoops that you mentioned that they're having a jump at the last minute. Do those hoops involve any Additional commitments either financially or either other commitments from the city that that are major The contingencies in the commitment letter from the one right now there they're basically they're similar things to You know not exactly the same but similar things to what we've got as far as contingencies in the development agreement in other words The developer doesn't have to close until we provide certain documentation for instance that They have a right to look at the title and raise any issues as to the title similarly We've got a right to look at their plans. We've got a right to look at their construction budgets and And there's quite a number of things that we've got as contingencies before we close that We haven't gotten to actually exchanging those documents yet, you know We're still we've still been in the process of compiling all those lists of what we'll need and things like that and moving forward sort of incrementally, but the I haven't done enough of these big projects to say, you know What's a reasonable period of time in which to exchange all those things so that everyone is comfortable and ready to proceed but From the city standpoint, I feel it's important that we should not be rushed into it where we get a whole bunch of Documentation that ties into the contingencies on the 29th of June and are asked to approve it all in the 30th Where we haven't had a chance to look at the things so The other and thank you for reminding me all them for as a the other item that isn't in this letter that would be attached and the developers agreed to is a More of an itemization as to the certain construction work that they're going to be doing during this interim period When I read it it talked about permission to commence certain construction work and it really wasn't clear What they're contemplating doing I think we have some idea of what they're going to be doing as I mentioned staking maybe moving some dirt to fill the area so it has some time to settle but There'll be an attachment to this in the final version that'll state more clearly what it is They're actually going to be doing in the interim period That's there they have a commitment To present or come to the table with some of their own money and they're they're raising that money Thank you Oh, thank you Just a comment not a question after a cursor examination of this information. It seems pretty clear-cut pretty precise I think is a good job on this letter regarding permission to start construction before the closing date looks To my eyes. It looks pretty good Good And that's a good thing. I thank you Anyone anyone else Hearing none We'll move on to the next item on our agenda And that was this resolution number 230304, which we already passed at our May 12th meeting. I think I got on here by accident So we are going to just skip right over that one and at that point Anyone has anything else one minute I just have a brief closing comment I'd like to thank everyone for their attendance tonight and Thanks to Paulette and Steve for providing us with a greater understanding of the precise implementation plan And I also like to thank Steve McLean for updating us on the status of our contract with Great Lakes TV eight and my cuts for getting that set up as well and mirror shrimp for support and getting this information to the council and to The public that really is the intention of these meetings and I would mark your calendars In July as we're playing another committee of the whole meeting for July 21st at this time It looks like that date will be on that Monday at about 6 p.m And the information at that meeting will be presented by the Sheboygan police department You get more information as time come along again. Thanks to you all We'll call the six regular meeting at a common council order Pat. Would you call the roll please? Bowman Burr Duel Excuse Manny Montemayor Moody Perez Rindfleisch Stefan Excuse Ben Akron Vanderwill Wongamon Warner Weninger 14 present Corms present Alderman graph Thank you, your honor. I'll move that we dispense with the reading of the Previous common council minutes in the same plan approved has entered on the record Moving in second at the minutes of the previous common council be approved under discussion Hearing none all in favor Opposed motion carried Alderman Bonilla. Would you lead us in a pledge allegiance, please? I? Pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands One nation under God Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Thank you, Anthony public forum Okay Call them in graph. Thank you, your honor. I'd like to pull two documents forward One is item 642 And one is from other matters 661 These are both documents that Have to do with the industrial park fund and a transfer So that Donahue and associates can start work on their new addition or the new plan as soon as possible So at this particular time I'd ask for suspension Moved in second for suspension or is there any objections for suspension? Hearing none proceed then I'd ask that the arrow be accepted and filed and that the resolution be put upon its passage Move the second at the arrow be accepted and file the resolution be put upon its passage under discussion Everyone I don't know if everyone knows Donahue will be building a new building out in our industrial park It's very good for our city, and I thank you Larry for that And a good partner with the city That would you call the roll please? Bonnet graph. Hi, Manny Montemayor Moody Perez Greenflash, then Akron Vanderwill Wongamon Warner Weininger Bowman 14. I motion carry. Thank you. Thank you Alderman graph and your honor the consent agenda 6 1 through 626 I would move that all our old be accepted and filed all our C's be accepted and adopted We pass the resolution and pass the substitute of ordinances Move it in second at all our old be accepted and file our C's be accepted and adopted Resolution and substitute ordinances be put upon their passage under discussion Hearing none, would you call the roll please? Bonnet graph. Hi, Manny Montemayor Moody Perez Greenflash, then Akron Vanderwill Wongamon Warner Weninger Bowman Berg 14 eyes Motion carried 627 will be referred 628 through 641 to be referred 643 644 45 46 and 47 by Alderman graph as a Resolution authorizing the borrowing of seven million Dollars providing for the insurance of sale of general obligation promissory notes therefore and level it levying a tax In connection there with Alderman graph You're on I would move that the resolutions be put upon their pass You only read what one one is. Yeah, go ahead. There's five of them here. I mentioned the other four oh 644 which is an initial resolution authorizing the borrowing of not to exceed six million two Six million two hundred ninety thousand providing for the issuance and sale of general obligation securities 645 which is a resolution authorizing the issuance and providing for the sale of two million three hundred seventy-five thousand a bond anticipation notes 646 which is an initial resolution authorizing the borrowing of not to exceed 12 million five hundred seventy thousand providing for issuance and sale of general general obligation security and 647 which is an initial resolution authorizing the borrowing of not to exceed 15 million eight forty eight providing for the issuance and sale of general general obligation securities I would move that all those Resolutions we put upon their passage Move did seconded the resolution be put upon their passage under discussion hearing none. Would you call the roll, please graph? Hi, Manny Montemayor moody Perez Rindflash Vanagren Vanderwill Wongamon Warner Weninger Bowman Berg Bonnet 13 eyes one no motion carry We have to take a moment in signings Some refinancing which it resulted in Substantial savings of interest and so forth. So you just want to mention those a couple items where we refinance sure, okay Yeah, okay All right, I'm Carol worth from Griffin cubic and as alderman graph mentioned One of the borrowings that we did tonight for the seven million dollars Includes your three million dollars of your capital improvements programs It also includes two refinancings of existing debt which have been extremely successful We had a state trust fund loan outstanding For about two million dollars at an interest rate of four and a half percent So part of that seven million was issued to refinance a state trust fund loan and as a result the city saved $177,000 of interest savings as a result of doing that refinancing and another part of that issue was to refinance What the principal remaining on your notes done in? 1996 is about a million eight left on those on that issue now That is outstanding at four point three six seven at this time We refit refinance that and saved an additional 63,975 dollars so out of the seven million dollar issue There's about three point eight done for refinancing which the city saved $241,000 in interest costs by doing that refinancing so extremely successful results for the city Thank You Carol good job. Thank you Okay, moving along 648 will lie over 649 to win 630s right now There may be a special council meeting coming up Next week. I'm not sure I'm gonna have What they'll be it will be Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday I have to find out some of your schedules some of you will be out of town next week for vacation a few days So I will be in contact with you this week and we'll set the meeting up Probably tomorrow. I'll be calling you just to find out what your schedule is right now. It'll lie over till 630 still have 649 to be withdrawn 650 by Alderman Graf winning her Stefan Doyle and bone eight transferring appropriations and the 2003 budget You're not moved at the resolution you put on Moved to the second the resolution to be put upon its passage on a discussion. Wait a minute. Which one are you six fifty? No, that's that's supposed to lie over It would be suspend otherwise you have to suspend no, that's right. We'll let it lie over. I don't need it Okay, we'll let it lie over 651 through 654 to be referred 655 by public protection safety recommending nine beverage operators licensed 1642 based on the applicants in a eligibility for licensing Alderman Doyle No, it's not here. I don't know Alderman Vanderweil Thank You, Your Honor. I make a motion to accept an adopt the arrow And I would ask at this time if a license holder Number 1642 is is it here? She is not so I'd like to make a motion to deny license number 1642 It's been moved in second for denial of license number 1642 Under discussion hearing none. Would you call the roll, please Manny? Monta Mayor Moody Perez Brin flash Ben Akron Vanderweil Wongamon Warner Wenninger Bowman Berg Bonnet graph 14 eyes motion carried 656 and 657 excuse me Alderman Bowman Thank You, Your Honor an item number 656. I would move it this time to file this general ordinance Move this second to file under discussion Alderman Bowman. Thank you, Your Honor The reason I'm asking to file it is because we've been discussing this Particular item in Public Works Committee, and we've been asking that the city attorney look into Extending this if he can To other than just the vehicles under 8,000 pounds if this is what state law allows so needless to say or over 8,000 pounds my apology and At this time, this is why I'd like to see it move to file only because we'd like to come out with a different recommendation Alderman graph I'm not sure, but I believe that this came out as a result of workings in In finance as well as the city attorney's office They wanted to To do something with this and I thought But of course you were gone last week. Maybe you didn't get a chance to look at this Alderman graph my recollection was this was drafted at your request that's brought in under your name. I draft it up Okay Alderman Warner, I think your honor, I guess the document was being referred to finance Couldn't this be referred to finance and then they could discuss the changes there Is there any reason why we can't do that? I'd like you have you have a motion to file right now and that takes precedent So if you can vote the motion down if you want and then refer it to finance and send it to finance If it is under discussion on a motion, why would we want to do that and we can take it sent it to finance And if they want to make changes to it, I guess Alderman ballman if there's any reason why you couldn't do that I would totally object to it, okay Hearing another all in favor to file say aye. Aye opposed Motion carries file Okay, five fifty. We didn't say what happened six fifty seven six fifty seven to be referred. I said that but Okay, you mentioned the number, but you didn't say five fifty arrow By the director of human resources and labor relations relative to the tentative agreement with the shabuaga professional police officer association Alderman van Akron We also take five sixty five five fifty one five fifty five sixty six five fifty two and five sixty seven if you'd like to sir I move that all the arrows be filed All three resolutions be put up on his passage Moved in second at all our owes be accepted and filed in the resolutions for the professional police officers Union asked me what one fifteen sixty four couple asked me fifteen sixty four agreements Firefighters IAFF local 483 National do it right No, I want to make the amendment on the three resolutions On all three contracts. I'd like to add a 2.5% employees premium share effective 6103 for all three contracts Excuse me. I Was under the impression because we don't have any the Terms in the resolution that the terms are in the are all That you on would not want to amend the are all just to explain what the Are would you want to mend this at the resolutions because we don't have any terms in the resolutions that this is this is what So you want to what was the amendment then a 2.5 employees premium share effective 6103 for all three contracts, right? Okay, that's not it showing up in any of the contracts, right Okay We have them go ahead Just to clarify I believe Alderman vernachron that That's to clarify The language in the RO's that sets forth the tenet of agreements that talks about the 2.5% employee premium share This this is to clarify the starting date. I believe Corrected Okay, we have a amendment before us first we got a vote on amendment all in favor I Posed motion carried. Okay proceed. I moved at all three resolution to be put upon as passage as amended Okay That would you call her old please? Monda mayor. Oh, excuse me all the money. Thank you your honor Before we vote, I'd like to offer a few comments Because as I look at the contracts and appreciate all the work that goes into them and respect the numbers that are there Given a normal economic climate Today I have problems with these because of the economic climate that we're in the cut and the shared revenue If we pass these I believe that we'll look at a situation where individual employees will be terminated as One viable approach to watching our budget and balancing it It's either that or tax increases of some significance. They're quite possible. I simply would like to state my perspective on the whole issue and Suggest that a broader way of looking at that some of this might be To take a lead ourselves and take lesser salaries across the board in the city From departments head from mayors possibly cuts in all their people's salaries So that employees and unions also taking lower increases than here printed would not feel duly discriminated against So I would prefer an approach like that. This is throwing a monkey wrench into the whole thing I simply state this would be my preference in one way to address the situation that we're facing today. Thank you If there's no other discussion Pat, would you call her old please? Montemayor Moody Perez Rindflash Van Ackeren Vanderwill Wongamang Warner Wenger Baumann Berg Boney Graf Manny Thirteen i's one more Motion carried 583 by Alderman Graf, Stefan Doyle, Boney authorizing transfer transferring appropriations in a 2003 budget Alderman Graf I move that the resolution be put upon his passage Move to second resolution be put upon his passage under discussion Hearing none, would you call her old please? Moody Perez Rindflash Van Ackeren Vanderwill Wongamang Warner Wenger Baumann Berg Boney Graf Manny Montemayor Fourteen i's Motion carried Motion carried I'm sorry I'm awful 460 Public Works Recommending entering into a contract for the Salisbury District Riverfront Promenade Alderman Baumann Thank you, Your Honor. I move that we accept and file the report of committee and pass the attached resolution Move to second to accept and adopt the RSC and pass the resolution under discussion Hearing none, would you call her old please? Perez Rindflash Van Ackeren Vanderwill Wongamang Warner Wenger Baumann Berg Boney Graf Manny Montemayor Moody Fourteen i's Motion carried 658 will go to finance 659 will go to public works 660, Alderman Vanderwill Thank you, Your Honor. I'd like to make a motion to have ordinance 660 lie over You don't need a motion for that. It's on the agenda for lying over Yeah? Oh, it doesn't? It doesn't see on there, you know Oh, we forgot to put it It'll lie over That's right. It's not on there Okay, just Thank you. It'll lie over That's right. It's not on there 661 along with 640 to a resolution by Alderman Graf We did that I did that Okay Steve They're printed so he doesn't have to read them Yeah, they're on the amended sheet Oh, okay 662 Can be accepted and placed on file Alderman Moved in second to placed R01 file All in favor? Aye Opposed? Motion carried 663 will go to plan 664 will go to city plan commission 665 will go to city plan commission 666, resolution by Alderman Bonet Authorizing grant permission on behalf of the city For the Blue Harbor Project developer To commend certain construction work Alderman Bonet For the resolution contest Moved in second to resolution We put upon this passage under discussion Hearing none, would you call the roll, please Rin Flesch Ben Akron Van Der Wiel Wongerman Warner Winniger Fowlman Berg Bonet Groff Manny Montemayor Moody Perez Fourteen Eyes Motion carried 667 will go to city plan commission 668 668 is an arrow by the city clerk's committee And communication from Gary Plummer Requesting an encroachment Into the north side of Mayflower Avenue West of North 13th Street For the purpose of maintaining An existing fence For property located at 1330 Mayflower Then we'll go to plan commission 669 is an ordinance granting Gary Plummer His area's science privilege of encroaching Upon described portions of Mayflower Avenue For the purpose of maintaining An existing fence That will also go to plan commission Moved in second to adjourn under discussion Hearing none, all in favor? Opposed?