 تشرف بالاشتغالي بالعلم ولا تبغي به ما عشت يا دا دا دا وياله من شراف عظيمي so here we're gonna go into another point which he رحم الله is mentioning before we move on I'm gonna mention the views of who said which chain of narration is almost authentic زهري عن سالم عن ابهي this is narrated that is حاكم الراهوية and أحمد بن حمبل said that this is the most authentic chain of narration they said that this is the most authentic they said that if ابن الشيهاب الزهري narrates from who سالم and سالم narrates from his father his father is who عبد الله بن عمر then they said this is the most authentic chain of narration this is the view of his حاكم الراهوية and أحمد بن حمبل the next one is if محمد بن السيلي narrates from and he narrates from عبيدة عبيدة السلماني who narrates from عليب الابيطالب they said that this this view is taken by عليب المديني and فلس they said that this is the most authentic chain of narration the third one which is if أعمش narrates from إبراهيم النخعي and إبراهيم النخعي narrates from عالقامة and ألقامة narrates from عبد الله now عبد الله here is who عبد الله مسعود إمام يحيب المعيل said this is the most authentic chain of narration يحيب المعيل said that this is the most authentic chain of narration the fourth one is زهري narrates from عليب بن الحسين عنابيه حسين من عالب الابيطالب who narrates from عالب الابيطالب and this is the view taken by أبو بخي بن عبيشيبه the great Imam that wrote that he مصنف رحمه الله بخاري رحمه الله he chose the fifth one which is إثماركي narrates from نافع and نافع narrates from who عبد الله المععمل إمام البخاري said this is the most authentic chain of narration all of those views are good now some even went to another point where they said no it's better that we say some said no it's better that we say the most authentic chain of narration أبو بخر is this the most authentic chain of narration عمر is this the most authentic chain of narration فولان is this or to say the most authentic chain of narration of this people of this land is this I mean those views and views I advise you if you want to see all of these chains of narration go to the الباعث الحسين اختصار علوم الحليث by أحمد شاكر حمد شاكر and he brings it on the تعليقات نشار حيدان اختصار علوم الحليث by إبن حجر رحم الله after that point he is swiftly moving on to another point which is the most authentic book the most authentic book or the most authentic books he is going to go into in the order of the most authentic books that's what he is going to go into I mean some after what he mentioned meaning that the حانيث in its levels they are not the same in authenticity you just saw because they have أصحو الأساني حافظ رحم الله he said قدما صحيح البقاري ثم المسلم ثم الشرطوهما the first one he said that is given presidency and given put forward is بقاري's book is what he is بقاري was the first person بقاري's pay attention nobody came before Imam al-Bukhari who conditioned authenticity for his book he was the first to do that first before him صحيح was written but no one conditioned authenticity بقاري was the first to say my book everything in it is going to be authentic first أول من قال the first person who said or the first person who authored in a book which is purely and all of it to be صحيح he is the first one who did it and then after him came his student الإمام مسلم رحمه الله I want to ask you guys a question now الإمام الشافع رحمه الله he said شافع he said on the face of this world today there is no book after the book of Allah أصحر من كتاب الماليك more authentic than the book دموطة how do you explain that شافعي سينا the first the most authentic book after the Qur'an دموطة إمام ماليك نعم شافعي was before إمام مالبقاري and it was قبل وجود الصحيحين شافعي remember this always remember this before أئمة الأربعة before the six books of Hanif وحنيف was before إمام مالبقاري المسلمة بداوة المذي الماجة سوز إمام ماليك سوز إمام الشافعي سوز إمام محمد they were all before them pay attention so شافعي was talking about the book that was present prior to بقاري's book coming out he didn't see it كان قبل وجود الصحيحين إبن الصلاح point it out in his كتاب علوم الحريث so the علامة brothers are of the view that بقاري's book are you with me بقاري's book is the most authentic book and it has the most benefit and that that his book it took presidents in authenticity of every book that came after it and then after comes his student مسلمة وحجد until إمام البقاري دار قطني دار قطني he said لو للبقاري لما راح مسلم ولا جاء if it was not for بقاري مسلمو not have come and know if it was not for بقاري مسلمو not have been in the equation know he have left the equation he would mean nothing meaning in the sense بقاري taught him that means benefit in general as that's that's something mentioned by دار قطني that's a general praise but when we come to in terms of specifying why بقاري's book is greater and the reason that بقاري's كتاب is more greater than the book of مسلم is it goes back to two things بقاري's كتاب is better in terms of the chain of narration being connected the connection of the chain that's the first one and it's also greater than مسلم in the angle of the narrators are reliable the reliability of the narrators from those two angles بقاري's كتاب is better and this is the evidence to show you بقاري رحمه الله the men in which he was alone in bringing مسلم did not bring his book pay attention the men that you find there are repetitive men they use both of them but the men that بقاري was alone that Muslim did not bring is 435 men 435 men بقاري had alone مسلم didn't have these 435 men from those 435 men which you will finally be alone but you won't find مسلم those who have been criticized from those 435 criticized are 80 of them only from those 435 those which have been criticized from those 435 is only 80 80 have been criticized what about the narrators that مسلم narrated in his Sahih that you won't find in what that you will not find in بقاري is 620 600 add 620 the narrators that have been criticized from those 620 is 160 so who has a stronger men بقاري does because the criticism that has been put to his men is less in number 160 the second one is that بقاري the men in which he is alone in who are criticized he did not bring in his Sahih many times because that makes sense those men in which بقاري was held against he didn't use them in his book in many many many many many many occasions where مسلم brings them a bit more than بقاري normally does so for that reason بقاري's authenticity is stronger the third one is the men that were spoken against بقاري or 4 the men in which his Sahih were spoken against in 4 the majority of them are his teachers the majority of those 180 those 80 are his teachers so we will say that the man is more aware of his teacher than you are the man is more aware the individual knows his teacher better than you do whereas مسلم is the opposite the people in which he narrated from it is those he was a contemporary or he lived at the same time as the fourth one is the majority of the people that بقاري was held against 4 or the men that was criticized from the 80 of his he brings their narration not to use it as an evidence in and within itself but to use it as a backup for other narrations as a shawahid are you with me for it to witness for other narrations opposite to مسلم مسلم brings it in his usul in the again بقاري's better than that and good the fifth reason while بقاري's حديث so that was all all that had to do with what the عدال of the رواد we finished that the fifth one is now are you with me بقاري رحمه الله the matters pertaining to his connection of the chain of narration ما يتعلق ب ما يتعلق بالتصال سنة that which pertains to the chain of narration being connected for Imam Imam Al-Bukhari if you look at the methodology of Imam Al-Bukhari when you look at the methodology of Imam Muslim you will find that their methodology is different let's take مسلم for instance first his methodology was what his methodology is if the narration consists in it عن it has anana in it he said that it has the rolling of it being connected if the the people who are narrated from each other عن lived at the same time he said that's enough for me and it was possible for them to meet each other whereas Bukhari he said no that's not sufficient he said I need an additional condition which is these people have to have met each other even if it's once that is an additional condition I require there has to be اجتماعهما there has to be them meeting each other even if it's one so Bukhari what did he negate مجرد المعاصرة just the fact that they lived at the same time Bukhari wasn't surprised with that so who is better in terms of chain now Bukhari is better and then you come back to the word of who رحم الله where he said رحم الله اول مصنفة في الصحيح محمد وخص بالترجيح the first person who authenticated authentic book is محمد meaning who محمد من اسمع إلى وخص وخص and he is specific to have he has he is specific to have what he is specific رحم الله in authenticity ومسلم بعد وبعض غرب مع أبي علي فضلوا دي لو نفع and Muslim is after Bukhari in authenticity even though we find some of the علماء مغارب لقد فاقل بخاري وصحة كما فاقل مسلم وصلاعتا بخاري past مسلم بخاري past مسلم and authenticity but you know what a muslim past بخاري in in the way muslim wrote his book muslim the way he organized his book is far greater than the way بخاري organized his book why is that بخاري because he was chaptering and muslim did not chapter his book and muslim was not looking after chaptering because the person who done the chaptering of imam al muslim's book some say it's no way and some say no it's not only no way but abbas al qurtubi who done the shara'ah which is what's it called المذهب I think so but abbas al qurtubi who also done the shara'ah of no way they all came together and what did they do they chaptered muslim for him بخاري because he was looking after chaptering pay attention بخاري because بخاري was looking after chaptering he cuts up the hadith he places it in different places the hadith which is in its long length he will take part out of it he is looking after chaptering so what would that do to the hadith it will break up the hadith and the hadith will be placed in different places and this will cause the student of knowledge not to have the cellist the way he can find the length of the hadith when a muslim will bring the chain of narration the hadith in its totality totality totality so you find a hadith as a whole in muslim بخاري now and you find another part of its segment in another place or he might bring the same hadith on the different chapters the way he organized it scholars they said نعم نحافظ رحمه الله we took previously in our previous class we talked about that muslim was put before بخاري مسلم was put before بخاري in terms of الصناع صناع حديثية the way that muslim wrote his book and بخاري was put before muslim in terms of authenticity we spoke about that issue and that the call of عليا ني سابوري who had said ما تحت قديم السماء عليا ني سابوري's view on that issue is not referring to الصحية it's not going back to the authentication of the book and which one is more authentic but what he's referring to on the other hand is he's referring to that the high book is what that the muslim's book is better in terms of سرد because if you go back to muslim after Imam Muslim رحمه الله you come from the مقدمة after the introduction all the hadith are just long and it goes on like that so memorization the way it's organized muslim is better whereas بخاري رحمه الله authenticity we spoke about it we spoke about it and we also spoke about the and we got to the issue of the issue of the issue of حكم الاتصال إذا تعاصرة المعنى فتمام المخارboy رحمه الله الالي كندش فبوت الكائه Peterson وأول من صنف في الصحيح وخص بال торجيح ومسلم بعد وبعض غرب ماعensored it was Lorenzo that was Ib حيث نحن نترك إلى المفلومة الثالثة حماها تقم بها المنزل ما were the first authentic books that were ever written we said it's Bukhari and Muslim we spoke about the first point which is who was more authentic amongst them too now insha'Allah we're going to move on to the second part which is Did Bukhari and Muslim both of them Did they bring all the authentic books a Hadith that were present in their books meaning all the Ahadith which are in Bukhari and Muslim are the only authentic Ahadith and anything outside them are not authentic and that they are the ones that encompassed and have narrated all the authentic Ahadith is that the case the answer is Bukhari and Muslim none of them had brought all the authentic Ahadith that were out in the world they did not bring all of it in their صحيح if you go to Bukhari Rahimullah Imam Bukhari Rahimullah he said as Ibn Salah mentioned his كتاب علوم الحليث he said he said I did not put in my book except that which is authentic Bukhari saying I did not put in my book and he said I left a lot of Ahadith which are authentic I left them not to lengthen my book so my book doesn't become too big so that's why his book was a مختصر he didn't bring every Ahadith that were authentic in the world same as Imam Musim he said Imam Musim said not every authentic Ahadith ليس كل شيء لدي صحيح he said not everything that is authentic in my eyes that I put in my book not every single thing that is authentic that I place in my book I only put in my book that which is unanimously agreed upon its authenticity are you with me so there were there are some things that Musim did see authentic but he didn't put in his book he chose not to are you with me so that question which is هل استو عباء الصحيح للبخار المسلم بوث انقمبس did they bring all the Ahadith which are صحيح the answer is no but then there comes a question after that which is هل فاتهم أشيء كثير did they if that's the case then the Ahadith which they have narrated which are authentic in their books both of them is there more than the ones that are remaining or are there more remaining out there which they haven't narrated this is a question that came up that the scholars of Ahadith spoke about إمام الحافظ ابن الأخرمي الإمام الحافظ ابن الأخرم رحمه الله he said إمام الحافظ ابن الأخرمي he said لم يفتهم إلا القليل nothing has passed them meaning what they've left out both of them is little meaning Ahadith are out there left which are صحيح are little in number now