 I'm gonna attach and that is what a put this in a context. I want to blog the dream lounge. People read that and they look at it and I blog about politics and stuff and let's say, oh Anthony is libertarian. I used to call myself that and go with it, but in reality it's not true. I'm actually, when I got down to it and started really researching and attaching my beliefs and my convictions on politics to a philosophy of politics, I had trouble finding one and then I found a term that is, it's pretty money for it. And it's actually much more radical than libertarian. It's very radical. It's fully consistent is what I call it. And it fits perfectly into what we're saying here. The what, the why, the what, and versus the how. So my political philosophy is something called declarationism, declarationism. And that basically holds the Declaration of Independence of the United States in this country and my view, specific view of it, on par or even foundational to the United States Constitution. So if you look at the US Constitution, which in this country is a supreme law of our land, it's a how document. And I think as far as I know, it's undisputed. It is literally a plan of government for how to run it. It's a series of laws of all these different things. Again though, it's a how document. And it wasn't the first one, the second one we use. What it does not give you though, at all, read it, is a what and a why. It gives you, and if you actually read it, you're creating a more perfect union, but a union of what. It doesn't tell you what or why you're doing anything in the first place, which in that case is a very serious thing, government, a monopoly on force. So again, the United States Constitution is a how document and it is a supreme law. But if you don't have a what and a why, the how can never be right. It's never gonna be validated. So when you hold the Declaration of Independence as on level, meaning equivalent to, yeah, or beneath it in the sense of being a foundation, like a filter that the US Constitution can't fit through, then this actually becomes supreme in that sense too. And the what and the why that the Declaration of Independence gives you, the Declaration of Independence is in a single sentence and it's that to secure these rights, which in the Declaration of Independence refers to individual rights, life, liberty, and suit of happiness, governments are instituted among men. What that means is you have a what, you have a government being instituted among men, which is quite literally not in the US Constitution. You just have a plan of government like an operation plan. So it gives you the what, you're instituting government and it gives you a why to secure these rights, which you don't have in this document, which basically invalidates anything in this document and any subsequent law that our legislators make is invalid and illegal if it doesn't fit through that what and that why. The what is easy enough, the why is where you're in trouble, because that means if you're right to your own life, to your own freedom, your liberty, and your unhappiness or your pursuit thereof is ever not protected or invalidated by the document, that part of the document's invalid, which is a very serious thing if you take it to the full extent. That means no one has the right to enact force against you, to threaten your life for any reason, meaning arrest you for say, takes a full income tax, military draft, or force you to do anything when you haven't violated someone else's right first. So again, a summarized declarationism which perfectly expresses this. The Declaration of Independence gives you a what, your instituting government, and a why you're doing it. The US Constitution doesn't. And this is kind of where we're at now, which when this was respected and held very, very, and understood very clearly, and it was practiced, our country was at a different point, and it was, I think, a lot better off. As we lost sight of this and stopped caring about it, now we just have a document just like our society now and all these are the topics, exercise, nutrition, dating relationships, where it's a total obsession and addiction to how things are done. So people now, if you look at government, they want to let the ramble too much on politics. They want to, they talk about how to fix government, how to improve conditions for XYZ, how to do all this different shit, but no one talks about what they're doing in the first place, and more importantly, why the fuck they're doing it, why? Why do you get up every day? Why do you go to work? Why do you go to school? Why do you do anything? Because life is good and it's worth protecting. Specifically, again, through the Declaration of Independence which gives you these, and our constitution doesn't, and if it's not filtered through that, I think it's invalid. I think our law is actually in history, and you look at everything objectively, that's actually where it fits together.