 Yes, 701. I guess, does everybody expect Tom? It is, yes. Okay, very good. Then I'm calling the meeting to order. This is a regular schedule meeting with the town of Berlin Development Review Board. We have one applicant tonight. That application is really a reapplication by John and Elizabeth Fitzhugh for final plan review of a minor two lot residential subdivision. And representing the applicant tonight is Keith. Keith, how do you pronounce your last name? Van Eiderstein. Van Eiderstein, okay. Good to meet you. So, let me ask you this question, Keith. If I may just go right to the heart of the matter. I've reviewed this application. I reviewed our minutes and our findings from 2019, October 2019. This is the same application that we reviewed and approved back in October 2019. Is that not correct? That is correct. This is the exact same application. There are no changes to the design or the layout. What happened is there was essentially communication's error with getting the final mile are recorded within the six month timeframe. We felt like- Communication error is a good one. We finished the survey, but it never got recorded. So that's why we have to resubmit. And Keith, did you do a complete survey of the boundaries or just a parcel? I did a complete survey of the boundaries. I actually have it by PDF. If you want to do a screen share, I can show it to you. No, that's quite all right. I just wasn't clear. The notations on the plan indicated a survey by others. Right. Right. But you're right. There were some older surveys that we were relying upon in the preliminary stages of the subdivision. Due to the size of the property, we make it a practice of getting the town approval before we go through the full expense of the entire official survey. Since it did get approved, we did the full complete survey and I certified it back in November of 2019. Okay. Carly, you have a question? Well, I'm just a point of clarification because I'm looking at, this must be the original application. And this is just, it says that Gunner McCain is acting on behalf of the application. I just want to make sure that we have something saying that Keith- I spoke to Gunner today. He had a conflict and he advised me that Keith would be on their behalf. Okay. Keith is an employee of Gunner. Okay. Okay. It's McCain firm that's doing the representation. I just wanted to make sure, just because we had this come up one other time when it wasn't okay. So I just wanted to make sure. Nothing against you, Keith. I understand. So what's Gunner's chief excuse for not being here? We actually- Just talk about what it was to know what his chief excuse was. Y'all know probably George too. We actually have three different DRB meetings with four different pro- with five different projects going on tonight. So it's kind of hard for two people to be in three different meetings at the same time. Good. Well, listen. I'm going to suggest that there's no new testimony unless there are questions by board members. I'm sort of prepared to accept the previous testimony and the previous findings that we have on this matter. I think that's legitimate. Unless somebody objects. I don't see why not. It's already been decided. It's just the filing. Right. Nothing's changed. Well, we do have one or two board members that were not, I don't think tour was available at that time. Tour was the only one it wasn't. That's correct. So do you have any questions on this application? No, I'm not, Mr. Chair. I took a look at the, you know, documents that were sent by email and they're pretty quick to me. So. Okay. So if they're. Keith, did you want to add anything to the testimony we've already been presented in writing? No, that's the project hasn't changed. Scope is the same. So I don't think we need to add anything. Very good. I would entertain a motion to close this hearing. I moved. I moved. Second. Motion been made and seconded. Is there a discussion of that motion? All those in favor of that motion, please signify by saying, I. I. I. I. Opposed. None. Very good. This hearing is closed. Thank you very much. Thanks, Keith. Thank you. We had a major fire catastrophe here. No. No, I just had to. I had to be in two places at the same time. That's why I'm at the fire station. I'm going to go back to the meeting. I'm going to go back to the meeting. I'm going to go back to the meeting right back to our regular meeting, which is going on right now. We're joining us. Good to see you. You're going to see you again. Thanks, Keith. What's that? You picked the right. Yeah. All this quick. Almost everybody here. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. You're the only other man we have come before this board tonight is a minutes. Of the meeting of March 16th. We accept the minutes of the meeting of March 16. Most have been made by Polly. Is there a second? Second by John. He beat you. Tour. Discussion that motion. All those who have that motion, please think about it. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Does the board want to go into a blue recession on this application? Sure. You said sure, Carla. We have to know. We don't have to. If we only want to discuss all conditions and. Okay, then now. Yeah. I think my feeling is, is we have the same application, the same conditions, the same findings. I agree. Okay. Very good then. Is there any other matters to come before this board tonight, Tom? No, just a reminder that you will have a. Meeting in two weeks on. 20th, April 20th. 20. Very good. In that case, I would take a motion to adjourn. If only my meetings are so quick. So moved. Molly and John. Thank you very much. All those who fail that motion, please say hi. Hi. Does this meet the old record? I don't know. Right. It was yours, Carla. I don't know. Put up too soon. Good night, everyone. Good night. Thank you. Thank you. Good night. Good night. Good night. Good night.