 Well, I'm wondering, I've become more and more intrigued with the idea of mandatory voting like has done in Australia. Now, I'm wondering, you know, if there's, if that, it can only be done on a federal level, or could a city, you know, cities and states and laboratories, could that be done because San Antonio, if the citizens got together and kind of talked about it and say they wanted it and formed a grassroots organization like I'm talking about, somehow get it to where we have a, you know, voting in San Antonio becomes mandatory. Yeah, there'd be a small fine for not, probably. Yeah, there'd be a small fine and the fine could go back as revenue for the city, you know. But now that can hurt the, you know, people who tend not to vote, they might be a lower income. But so there's things like that I wonder about. But then at the same time, overall increasing voting would seem like a benefit, you know, especially maybe people of lower income. Yeah. So it's a constitutional law question whether it would be constitutional and I don't know the answer. I've never heard of that. I'm interested in the law of voting, so I'll look at it a little. I've never heard of a court case that actually, because I don't know if a city or state's ever actually tried it. I assume that what would happen is San Antonio would say we're going to require it for local elections and if you don't do it, we're going to have a fine and somebody would sue, right? Yeah. And then we would find out. But the constitution doesn't explicitly forbid it and generally leaves voting matters to the states in turn. There'd be a home rule question too here. I don't know whether, like in Massachusetts, a municipality couldn't do it. Clearly the state legislature would have to approve it. I don't know how that works here. That's a state law question. I just want to mention one legislative change that I'm pretty sure is constitutional that we would be supportive of is lowering the voting age in municipal elections to 17 or 16. Just municipal because you can't do it, federal. And it's for a specific reason to go to that age, which is that then the kids can be taught how to vote, not who to vote for, but the voting process during their high school socialities class. And they can get in a habit of voting when they're 17. So 18 is a really bad year because an outright majority of kids have just left high school and you can't teach it to them anymore. And several cities either have or are planning to lower the voting age. Tacoma Park, Maryland. Thank you. The question came in on Twitter. Oh, it did? Yeah. And I'm for it. I'm for it. I even did an op-ed on it. Terrific. Oh, okay. If I really had, Michael, to your question, if I really had the time in organizing the cloud, I would probably go for lowering the voting age rather than requiring voting just because I feel like we'd lose a requiring voting battle because it's just the American. You know, I just feel like we would, I'm for it actually, but I just think it's a loser. If you lost in a legal battle, that might set the precedent. Yeah, that's another reason. But I also think it'd be really hard to get a city to do it. Yeah, maybe the right city could do it. Right. Antonio, maybe, but I'm not sure that it is. Yeah, yeah.