 political order. In this discussion we are going to highlight the political order given by Mix Weber because Mix Weber's scheme also highlights the discussion on the state and its mechanism because he described his political order which is categorized by struggle among various groups just like that in the society. Mix Weber's scheme is that in the state, there are various groups like in the society. What is the reason for that? Who should have the resources? What is the ultimate objective? People are involved in the state. People are involved in the working of the state. They are involved in the state institutions. They also have their own objectives. So the political system or state institutions do not come under the control of a single group or class because there are some authoritative positions that affect the other social institutions and they have the emphasis on the democratic form of government specifically with the help of political leadership. Mix Weber's philosophy regarding political order is that the political order does not come under the dominance of a single individual. In fact, all the systematical leaders in the state are given the same orders and duties and all of them have to create a political order that ultimately moves towards a proper democratic system. What is necessary for that democratic political system is that a single class or a single group does not have dominance. In fact, all of them have representation in this entire system and all of them have equal opportunities to work. Political leaders in Weber's political scheme are talented and responsible. Those who have some kind of characteristics like that they can be elected by the help of a popular election and through the elections some kind of leadership can emerge because then the leadership must have the favor of the people, majority of the people. If they get elected, they will have the support of the people on their backs and they will have the ability to do their work properly and they will be sure that because people are with them, they will be able to do their work in a better way. Then definitely the state machinery that consists of military, police, parliament, judiciary and civil services. Now where do these people come from? They come from different classes, from different groups and this competition of all of them also keeps going for their authoritative positions. It is not like there is no competition in the state machinery but how does all of this depend on the political order? That is how the leaders want to run the affairs of the state and the government. So the authoritative positions and the desire to occupy the authoritative positions actually here in the system sometimes there are clashes or controversies. Because the state has the legitimate power and which can be used whenever the state needs to use that kind of power. Because the institutions here run different types of tussles and as a result of these tussles, sometimes there are problems in the state machinery but if there is a popular, particular representative leader then he will be in the position to maintain all these situations and issues and he will have the ability to run things properly and smoothly. But if the leadership does not have the ability or skills then the controversies within the state machinery and the authoritative positions run by the controversies because of which the system is always disturbed.