 तुट्रिंट जिंग कताल लोग पूलितिकल साँईस के दिसिप्लन से हैं या पूलितिकल सुष्योलोगी के दिसिप्लन से हैं तेर वेरी मुज्छ प्मिल्यर पिद्दिस नेम अप तुमसोव कुंक तुमसोव की जु कोंटीब्उष्यशन हैं उकी तुमस्पी हैं और जिस कोंटेकस्ट में वो आपनी बात करते हैं ताप उपर यह लोग गर पागतर नजुर तुमगे जोभी फिलोझपर वेरी मुज्छ से भागत के मुटाबिक अपके नजरीयात पेश करता हैं याँ अआप्ट्टाइम प्रीरेईट ता और यंगलिएड गंडर एऽठे है आपट भने हुए नहाँवाँ जब आप पस में मूश्लेग की अंडर तसल थी लोगों के इच्टलापात थे और उसकी बजहासे बहुत सारे लोगों को जो मुष्कलाथ का सामना करना पडा उस् सिवल वार के हालात, उनके मुश्रे की मुश्कलात, उनके नजर्यात के साथ मिखसाप कोगीं। सो, to describe this conflict in the most general of terms, it was a clash between the king and his supporters. And specifically, the groups, those were in the favor of Munarki and who preferred the traditional authority of Munarki. And the groups, those were in the favor that Munarki has, that is, the power of the king should be so much that it should be all-in-all. And in comparison, the other group, they thought that the authority should be divided between the king and the supporters. So, this clash of interest, about this, the Hobbes learn from their time and circumstances in their philosophy. Because at that time, the development regarding the institution of parliament, that was also debatable. Hobbes represents a compromise between these two factions. On the one hand, he rejects the theory of divine right of king. It is very interesting that Hobbes said that the absolute authority of the king should not be there. There should be a check on the king. Because Hobbes lived through a time when England and the English history and the most productive years of his philosophy that was again considered when he was experiencing a turmoil in his state. So, under this situation, when Hobbes presented his perspectives, then they became controversial. Why did Hobbes' philosophy become controversial? Because Hobbes thought that the human being, the human mind, is basically self-centered or interest-based. Because wherever the human being is, he will not accept any other force that is against him in his path. So, where Thomas Hobbes discussed that the absolute power of the monarch is not there, he also thought that if we have to control over the human beings, if we have to keep a check that the situation is normal, if we are in control, then what can be the way for that? That the distribution of power is such a mechanism in which not everyone has a share, rather that the formula of the distribution of power is created by keeping the human nature in mind. So, the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, the contribution of Thomas Hobbes regarding discussing human nature, regarding the distribution of power, regarding the role of the monarch, there are many questions about this which have many objections to the response of Thomas Hobbes.