 य आळ्नबन द़ार反 bunny । आब व्यईधम। जा । कbike जिन्च् स़िय जिन्च्स committee of law आप व तिकभBar stones agriculture य आप व्यईच्सलग कता aspirane आप मोच क्षणस still आनजीच अप शुब �xi pu श Test अदो कै लोग को नहीं एजी आपने गोगा क्या यो साथीटेखे इक औफ एक सब नहीं थे. प्रुख़ फ्हद कर शब ये प्रूप गोदे रँब बदो. आप देख़ों बहुत नहीं प्रूप जर्दप करने. अप देखच दोगी, इह तुप औव. करेक्टर्स कोंई से हैं? नमबर वान, तीरी के तरा सान्टिफिक लाँ भी एक स्टेट्मेंट है. इत हैजा, इत इत इस लिप्रिजेंट बाई स्टेट्मेंट. सेक्किन इप्वाट्टर्द तेंग, सान्टिफिक लाँ देई हैजा सर्टन फार्मुलास. अगर इसा देई बाई सटेट्मेंट के प्रीडिक्त लाँ देई, और सान्टिफिक लेजास को यह होड़े आता है. आजर अगर असको, अबने रेखास को उस पामुला एक बाई अप प्पाएख कर रेगा।, if we apply the result of any experiment according to the formula, then the scientific law tells us that this result will come. For example, we have a Mendel's law of segregation. It is said that when we cross the tall and short plant, then the F2 generation after F1 will have a ratio of 3 to 1. So, if we talk about the independent assortment, the independent assortment says that if you take two trades with you in the independent assortment, then you will get a ratio of 9331 of F2. Means, there are certain formulas which pre-define the experiment results. Thirdly, it means that we can do the scientific law first. Whatever experiment we are going to do, we can predict the results of it in the light of the law. Now, this law is basically the evolution of theory. It has evolved from theory. It has evolved from observation to hypothesis. It has evolved from theory to law. Now, there are certain conditions in the course. If we talk about theory, then theory is an explanation with which it is not necessary that all the scientists agree. Second, there is a very special thing about the theory. There are chances that there might be some contradictory results in the coming years. Because of which, the theory can be rejected or changed. Whereas, in the law, if a theory is so perfect that there is no contradiction in it, and that is continuously giving the same results. And the second one is giving the same results throughout the evolution. That is, there are 100 years, 200 years, 50 years. All the experimental evidences are going in the right of the theory. And secondly, all the scientists agree with that theory. So, that theory ultimately attains the form of a law. So, in that case, when there is no disagreement with it, then what is that theory is becoming the law. What is the authenticity of the law? Since it is made up of theory, we can call any theory as a law. But again, there are some possibilities in the theory. There can be some possibility of variations. For example, if you see, on one side, there are apples on the other side, we have written the theory of the century. If you say that the apples are red in colour, then the chances are that some apples will also be available to you. So, there is no 100% accuracy in the theory. There are some results that can deviate it. Under the scientific law, you see that they are made up of orange. Now, we all know that oranges are always available in the orange colour. In the market, the orange available is not available in the green colour. They are available on trees. The normal orange available for eating, they are orange in colour. The scientific law says that it is solid. You cannot change that. You cannot challenge that. You can only achieve the challenge when you have solid evidences. And this is very useful to challenge your scientific law. There are some laws in physics that are slightly modified later. Like the basic forces laws, there are some. But normally, this scientific law does not change. They are universally accepted. Examples, again, like the theory, there are many scientific laws in physics and chemistry. But in biological sciences, in life sciences, there is acute shortage. Acute shortage means that there are very few scientific laws available. There are many hypotheses. The basic reason for this is that biological sciences are very versatile. You will keep any parameter for something special. Like in physics, we say that light goes straight. So, light bulb goes straight far. You can take it as a law. But if you say that all the plants that are of green colour, they do photosynthesis, then it is not possible. Because there are many plants that have no mechanism of photosynthesis. They are non-photosynthetic. This means that in life sciences, in biology sciences, in biology sciences, there is shortage of laws. For example, we have law of segregation, of Mendel, law of independent assortment, both of them are in our FSC. Hardy-Wainberg law. Hardy-Wainberg law is basically relevant to the population. I will tell you simply that it says that in any area, the frequencies of genes do not change as much as the population is intact. You will read this in your next semester. But this is also the scientific law. These are three examples that are more common to us.