 Well, you know it's really interesting. We've been doing a study since 2008 called the Dynamic Soil Property Study and we've been going from one site to the next, looking at the differences in soils. Really, for the most part, looking at how degraded these soils are and comparing that from one side of the fence to the other. The good example of that would be that maybe this first soil that we have here is a scoob soil in Smollett County, White River, South Dakota. You can see the two profiles here. This is that native rain site, the Deep Organic Manor in that profile. This is something that was plowed 100 years ago or so. And you can see, here's the plow layer, but you can see that diminishing organic matter. When we do this in an analysis, we can see that we start with almost 10% in the surface on that native rain site, but we've diminished that organic matter in that profile. Huge losses, huge differences in infiltration, two minutes to almost two hours, huge differences. People look at me and they go, well, that's one site. Well, let's go to the next site. This is a glenum soil. This is in Hyde County, South Dakota. It's my Hymor. The site is actually north of Hymor. It's a glenum soil. Here we've got that native rain site that's rotationally grazed, something that's overgrazed right across the fence. And then we had it converted to crop line right next door also. Again, you can see that diminishing organic matter pool, differences in that infiltration data, huge differences, two minutes. Actually, this one was less than 10 seconds in one of the reps. Down to 30 minutes, once we convert it to crop land. Huge differences in data. Then you start looking at, well, what are the differences in organic matter from one side of the fence to the other? Native range, compared to that converted crop land, we have 45 tons of organic matter that's different from one side of the fence to the other. If we look at that whole profile.