 It's just the same shit though. If there's going to be a leak out of this meeting, let it be that I said that the Democrats are going back to their old habits and spend and spend. I know it doesn't look that way, the way they give the figures out. I think they're blowing smoke. Some of them in the Senate play partisan politics with the budget resolution, and now over in the House they're putting together a budget that I think takes no meaningful steps toward reduction of spending. I realize that on our side it's a few shorter votes. You and the rest can make a strong case on the floor. We need to include the House resolution before we get to the conference and then the conference. I think we've all got to hang tough and force some responsible fiscal decision making. I believe that they're playing a dangerous budget game because of the people in this country. This whole talk that makes it look like we're really on our way to doing something like this was. We've done this for the economy, for the business optimist. So if they keep on with this political posture and advocating a responsibility, I think we may not have the budget we want for the time, but we're certainly going to have a political issue. And there's Dave's comment. Dave's got a comment on the House budget. We briefly discussed our legislative strategy. Well, I'm just going to say that we now pretty well know what's going on out of the House that's been offered by the House committee. In the contrast between a historic across-the-board reduction of the Senate budget last week and this Elmer Gantry budget that we had coming under the House that the Democratic Committee Chairman this week couldn't be clear. Both of them looked the same on the top, 56 billion in reduction the first year. But at the 56 billion in the House, 40 billion of them is either defense costs that are excessive or gimmicks of one type of budget that will not permanently reduce federal spending in the budget. One example of the gimmicks is that they're taking 4 billion, which has been in an escrow fund for several years in the litigation about offshore receipts, and putting it into the budget. Well, that reduces the reported deficit by 4 billion, but right now the Treasury is borrowing that money from the escrow fund so it will have to go out into the public market and borrow the 4 billion and put it into the budget. So there will not be one dime of change in the Treasury's borrowing, which is precisely the problem in terms of the financial markets today. Another way of showing the contrast is to say, what have they actually cut in the House budget by way of domestic spending? I'd point out that the baseline for domestic spending in 1986, if we make no changes and discretionaries or entitlements here, is $594 billion. The House budget exempts from one dime of cost, nearly 60% of that entire baseline of non-definition spending. $360 billion worth of baseline spending, not one dime of cuts. All of the entitlements for the most part, attention entitlements are exempted. All the means-tested programs are exempted, all the education programs, the social programs, a variety of others. Now, there's just no way you can get a real tax reduction package. Well, hi. Good to see you. Well, good for a minute. Have we a minute or two? Sure, absolutely. Bob's got to solve this problem for you as the President. The Soviets have put down a proposal on federal work. Is that the main thing, verification, or is it the difference in what they want to cut down to? There are two problems. One is the verification. But it's related to the name of the problem. Table figures, and they're similar to table figures that are about $160,000 less than what we know they have. And the last one they don't wish to have out of a verification because we'll discover pushing them on. It's been going on for 11 years, and we have not agreed to the name of the negotiations yet. We call it MFI, which is a balanced force reduction. They call it MFI, mutual force reductions. They don't like it balanced. They don't like the word balanced. So for after 11 years, they can't agree on the title. That's reflecting what they've got to do for us to agree to a treaty in this new city. I wonder what had happened if you go in the back of the table and it started getting out of there. I've never mentioned it, but just you started saying that. But now we won't agree to any clause that would allow you to comment on what we have. We're not going to do that. All right, good to see you. Well, it's good to see you. You don't mind. We just decided since the weather is nice to go out and sit around on the patio. Don't be afraid. Thank you. You're welcome. I assure you. Good to see you again. Welcome back. Thank you. Nice to be back here. You've just been here, and then you can then join us for a pretty future. I have just come back from Annapolis from shaping hands with 1032, and they presented me with a Navy bathrobe, and then they showed me what's inside the Navy bathrobe, in big gold letters. The Army. The Army. The Army. Oh, hold on a minute. I think it will. Now would you come in and join us? At the summit, the economic summit, all of a sudden the other heads of state around the table decided they'd better get involved with this whole program too. Was that on the car, sir? No. That came from Romania. He was a director at Hollywood. That was his story. The ambassador of Romania. How do you do, Mr. President? Welcome. Thank you. Thank you. My wife, Elena. How do you do? Nice to see you. Thank you. She's interpreted. Mr. President, I will tell you, why don't we do this, you and I, over in front of the fireplace for pictures? Thank you. Thank you. No. No. My magic handshake takes place. 1032 of them. The ambassador of China. Yes. Welcome once again. I know you've been here before. Yes. My God, she's met you. Mr. President, nice to see you, and we're looking forward to the President's visit here. Let me. You and I are going over in front of the pictures. Thank you. You can join us after we take one picture. When you're waiting, then you can come in for a second. Yes. Yes. Thank you. This is my letter of credits, and it is my remark. Yes. All right. Oh, you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Now, thank you. Yeah, go ahead. And watch some of YouTube. There. Yes. Thank you. Well, I can watch. Thank you. I want to say we're looking forward to this meeting. July. Yeah. Thank you very much. Yes. I have brought the warm greetings from Chairman Chen Tiao-pi. General said, General said, please help President Chen Tiao-pi in the first 10 years and the premier talked about the great pleasure of our visit there. Well, thank you. Must have gotten hot standing out there in the sun, though, for over an hour or so. It was getting a little warm, yeah. They're coming back from both sides. Yeah. Coming in. That made it get through faster. Professor, the ambassador of Jordan. Yes. Our successor. Welcome. Well, we're looking forward to next week's visit with your king. You and I shall both be from the fireplace here and have a photo taken in exchange for our favors. And what the king is doing in this attempt to appease us. I have a step back for so many of you. The governor has some discretion on me. Oh, the governor has some discretion on me. The governor has some discretion on me. Oh, okay. We'll let you check that. I'll tell you. You're right on the thing. I'll check what it is. I'll let you check what it is. I'll tell you.