 really just a few weeks of being there, presented on my desk for my review and approval, was a revision of our copyright policy that they had obviously been working on for the last several months, I gather. And I took a look at it and I had done, as you know, some work previously in my previous position with an explication of the code and its meaning and teaching people about how to apply it. And I took a look at this policy and it seemed to be at several levels, not at all applied to the kinds of new principles that I knew we were trying to enunciate and the principles we were trying to pursue. So I drew upon that experience from my previous position and contacted all of you and gracious enough to come and help us essentially do what I think of as sort of the second generation of the code work, which is basically to take this wonderful theoretical framework and principles and begin to actually apply it to put it in action in policy. I really think that this sense of liberation was really a reflection of the fact that we have all labored under these assumptions, if you will, and these pretexts about how to apply fair use that we've all known from the very beginning, were rather artificial, didn't really apply fair use very well and required us to be sort of not particularly good in enforcing policies and procedures that we knew weren't really reflective of the principles we were trying to enforce anyway. And so I think there was a real sense of relief that where we were finally able to take the principles that we believed in and be able to apply them in a policy was something that I think was really a relief for everyone and a real joy to be able to work in and apply. Legal context in which it presents itself, the foundations it has really we found went a great, a long, long way towards working with legal counsel who are essential partners in developing an application really carried a lot of weight with them in terms of knowing that the applications and the risk that is being talked about on the part of the university was well-based and well-grounded. And pleased to say that as a result of the discussion with everyone involved, we were able to take the principles that were outlined in the code and the concepts, and this is I think a great thing about them, about the code and how it's written, is it's a really nice theoretical orientation or context that you're then able to take and apply it to a campus situation in very real terms. And for us, that worked extremely well, so we had all that context of theory and context and legal background and precedent and being able to put into application on campus with legal counsel present and participating was extremely helpful and made it work.