 That concludes general questions. Before we move to First Minister's questions, I have agreed to allow the First Minister to give a brief update on Covid-19. At my request, the First Minister wrote to party leaders to provide details of the update as far as possible in advance so that members would have the opportunity to consider that and ask questions. I am going to extend this session to facilitate this, First Minister. Thank you very much for that, Presiding Officer. Before I update Parliament on Covid protections in schools, can I firstly, though, take this opportunity to pay tribute to Her Majesty the Queen following the 70th anniversary of her accession, becoming the first monarch to celebrate a platinum jubilee represents a unique and remarkable record of service? In recent weeks, and as recently as Tuesday, I have committed to keeping Parliament and school communities updated on Covid protections in schools, including the use of face coverings in classrooms. I have been clear that we do not want to keep those or any other measures in place for longer than necessary, but that we must continue to be led by scientific and expert advice and put the safety of our young people first. On Tuesday, the advisory subgroup on education met to discuss a number of issues, including the use of face coverings. The group reiterated its previous position that the removal of mitigations in schools should be phased. It also advised that the next step of the phased approach could begin after the February half-term break, starting with the removal of the requirement to wear face coverings in the classroom. The subgroup has advised that this change should apply to pupils and staff in classrooms and take effect from 28 February, when all schools will have returned from the half-term break. That change will reduce barriers to communication in the classroom and reduce any wellbeing impacts that arise from the use of face coverings, for example, through their use in support learning and teaching. Of course, in that point, I want to stress, any young person or staff member who wishes to still wear a face covering in the classroom should be fully supported in doing so. We currently expect that face coverings will still be required outside the classroom in indoor communal areas of schools for a period after 28 February, but that will be kept under regular review. In arriving at its recommendation, the advisory subgroup pointed to reducing case rates for secondary aged pupils, which is a recent development, falling hospitalisation rates across all age categories and the fact that, at this stage, the estimated R rate is now below 1. In addition, vaccination rates for young people continue to increase. In recognition of that encouraging situation, the subgroup also advised that the remaining restrictions on school assemblies should be lifted and that school visits link to transitions, for example, primary 7 children visiting a new secondary school should be given greater priority. Those changes were all discussed with the Covid education recovery group this morning. Our guidance will be updated next week, but I wanted to confirm this decision today in order to give children and young people, their families and school staff certainty about the forthcoming changes before the February break. They represent a further step in allowing children and young people to return to a more normal experience in school after many, many months of sacrifice. I hope that they will be welcomed not just across the chamber but, more importantly, across the country. Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. Like the First Minister, I want to pay tribute to Her Majesty the Queen and her incredible service over the past 70 years. I was in the chamber yesterday when my colleague Stephen Kerr led a debate on the subject and I was pleased almost every member participating in that debate was able to recognise the incredible service of Her Majesty the Queen. In terms of the statement that we have just heard from the First Minister, Scottish Conservatives have urged for weeks that young people should no longer be forced to wear face coverings in classrooms for seven hours a day. Young people's education has been unnecessarily disrupted for far too long. Finally, after weeks of refusing to budge, the Government has returned and, while it is welcome, it has taken far much longer than was necessary. But today I want to ask about another pressing issue. Earlier this week, ScotRail confirmed that it is going ahead with plan cuts to 250 services across Scotland from May of this year. In April, the Scottish National Party Government took charge of Scotland's railways, so will the First Minister commit today to cancelling those cuts? First Minister, in response to Douglas Ross's comments about my statement a few moments ago, the fact that he has been urging this change for weeks is not a demonstration that he has been right—it is a demonstration of his deep, deep irresponsibility. Had we made this change weeks ago, we would have done so at a time of soaring infection rates among school-aged children and put school-aged children and those who work with them in schools at greater risk. Secondly, had we done it before today, we would have been acting against expert and scientific advice. It would have been the wrong thing to do. We are doing it now at the right time and in line with advice, and I think that marks the responsibility of this Government in contrast to the responsibility of the main opposition. On the issue of ScotRail, first I welcome the transport minister's confirmation yesterday that ScotRail will come into public ownership on 1 April, of course, upholding a manifesto commitment of this Government, which was so overwhelmingly elected just under a year ago. We will continue to do what ScotRail is already doing, making sure that we have a railway that is fit for the future. It is the case that travel patterns and the numbers of passengers have changed substantially and significantly in the course of the pandemic, and the pattern of rail services needs to reflect that. We also need to keep that under review. As we see people begin to go back to the office, although we are still in a period of hybrid working, as we see passengers increase on our railways, we need to ensure that the timetable and the routes that are serviced by ScotRail remain fit for purpose. This Government will take on that responsibility to make sure that we have a railway that is fit for the future and the type of railway and the quality of railway that the public have a right to expect. The First Minister welcomed the transport minister's statement yesterday. Did she also welcome what the transport minister said about the cuts when they were announced in her local area and said that they were not acceptable? I will be interested to see if the First Minister agrees with that previous comment from her transport minister. Here is the problem. The Government says that it wants more of the public to use public transport, but it does not do enough to improve services or bring down rising ticket prices. What is the use in nationalising services if the SNP is just going to do the exact same as ScotRail? The First Minister has just accepted that she is going to continue with the cuts that ScotRail is planning. If she will not change those cuts that are planned, will she at least guarantee that when the Scottish Government assumes control of ScotRail, not one further service will be cut? First, let's talk in terms of reality rather than the mischaracterisation and misrepresentation that we have just heard. I know that Douglas Ross will not want to hear that, but I am going to persevere in answering the question. The timetable, which he initially proposed to add 100 extra services compared to December 2021, is now adding nearly 150 services following the consultation. From May 2022, ScotRail will operate around 2,150 daily services, providing almost 600,000 seats. The key point is that I am not sure if Douglas Ross or anybody else across the chamber is suggesting that there should not be changes to ScotRail timetables to reflect changes in passenger usage. We have seen a significant and substantial change during the pandemic. That change, to some extent, will continue after the pandemic. It may revert back to what the usage of services was like before the pandemic, and the timetable needs to adapt to that. That is the sensible and responsible approach to take. Of course, on rail fares, we will continue to take steps to keep rail fares affordable. That is one of the key benefits of public ownership in the years to come. I will end this answer with a reminder that rail fares, on average, are significantly lower already in Scotland than they are where the Conservatives are in power in England. The First Minister urged me to listen to her answer, which I did, but it had nothing to do with the question that I posed to her. She went on for quite a while and I asked, would she commit to guarantee that her Government will not cut any services going forward, and there was nothing in that answer? To defend the changes that are coming in May, based on what was happening in December 2021—we know what was happening in December 2021—the First Minister was warning about the tsunami of cases and urging people not to go out of the house or go to work. It is not really a fair comparison about December 2021 with the situation that we are in today. All that the First Minister is doing is replacing ScotRail with SNP rail. Different owners have the same problems. While public transport services are being cut, her Government has turned against drivers as well. She has abandoned plans to improve roads, and now she is bringing in the workplace parking tax without any cap on the amount that people will be forced to pay. When it was first proposed, organisations such as the EIS, the Scottish Police Federation and the Unite Union warned about the cost falling on teachers, police officers, care staff and shift workers—all warnings completely ignored by Nicola Sturgeon and her Government. This week, the Scottish Retail Consortium has said that the workplace parking tax is a recipe for extra cost and complexity. Today, the AIA warns that workers will be hit with levies as much as £1,000. When people are already on the brink with bills increasing and the cost of living rising, why is your Government in favour of a costly workplace parking tax at the same time? Before you respond, I would remind colleagues that I would very much like to hear both questions and responses. Many people in this country right now are on the brink because of benefit cuts and tax rises being imposed by the Conservative Government at Westminster and because of their complete failure to respond appropriately or accordingly. Let me address the points on ScotRail first of all. What I guarantee is that, when the Scottish Government takes ownership of ScotRail, we will operate a timetable that is reflective of the usage of the railways by passengers. That is about the real-world running of a railway that is fit for purpose. Secondly, we will continue to ensure that we have affordable rail fares. We will take action to ensure that rail fares are affordable. Let me remind Douglas Ross that right now rail fares are 20 per cent cheaper on average in Scotland than they are across the rest of the UK. That is a good foundation on which to build, I would suggest. Let me turn to the workplace parking levy. Remind Douglas Ross that it gives a discretionary power to local authorities. They do not have to use it if they do not want to or if they do not think that it fits their local circumstances. I remind Douglas Ross that it was before he was the leader of the Scottish Conservatives. I grant you but in their last local government manifesto the Tories said, and I quote, we need to empower councils and give them a renewed sense of meaning and purpose. We are giving discretionary powers to local authorities and what do we have? The Scottish Conservatives opposing it and moaning about it. The second point is that this is simply giving local authorities in Scotland a power that local authorities in England have had for a decade and more, which is allowed to local authorities in England by the Conservative Government. Not for the first time, there is a deep hypocrisy at the heart of Douglas Ross's question. Here we are again. All parties across this chamber are rightly signed up to our climate change objectives to our net zero ambition and we need to get people out of cars. We need to get people on to public transport, which is why public ownership of the railways is a good thing, which is why free bus travel for under 22s introduced by this SNP green government is a good thing. We will not just set the targets, we will take the action to help meet those targets and we will leave Douglas Ross and his colleagues whining as usual on the sidelines. Douglas Ross, here is the difference between myself and the First Minister. I want to empower councils. She wants to use them as a shield. Last week it was her shield about chopping the bottom of the doors and this week she is using councils as a shield against her tax rises. It is going to be councils led by the SNP and the Labour Party that will introduce these car park levies, because I can assure her that Scottish Conservative councils will not. Her government is anti-driver. Her government is anti-driver. The First Minister does not seem to understand that, for many people, particularly those living in rural areas, they need their car to get to work. Instead of delivering better public transport to make up for the difference, her government is going to nationalise the railways and make no improvements to the services. Just what can people expect from a nationalised railways service from the same government that cannot even build a ferry? From the same government that launches ferries with painted-on windows and sends ferry contracts to Romania instead of poor Glasgow? First Minister, are trains under your government going to go the same way as ferries have? On railways, this is a government that has connected or reconnected more of Scotland to the railways in the last number of years. Since 2009, the communities of Alloa, Lawrence, Kirk, Armadale, Blackridge, Colger Crookes, Conanbridge, Shofair, S-bank, Newton-Grange, Gorebridge, Stowe, Gallashale, Tweedbank and Tor have all been reconnected to the railway through the reversal of beaching cuts. In the next three years, Reston, East Linton, Del Cross, Cameron Bridge and Leven will all follow in being reconnected to the railways. The Government has a record to be proud of and we will build on that record. I am going back to the workplace charging issue. Listening to Douglas Ross there, it is quite clear what his approach is. He will empower local authorities, if he ever gets the chance, which I would humbly suggest is unlikely. He would empower local authorities only if they then do exactly what he instructs them to do. That is not empowerment. We have given powers to local authorities. It is up to them to judge whether and to what extent to use those in line with their local circumstances. That is empowerment. We will get on with improving public transport and meeting our net zero targets. That is why people continue to put their trust in this Government. I start by joining others in paying tribute to Her Majesty the Queen, 70 years of dedicated commitment and service to the public of this country. On face masks, I welcome the developments today. After almost two years, that will add anxiety for staff and workers in schools as well as for parents. It makes ventilation and hippofilters even more crucial in our schools, so we need a credible plan from the Government on those issues. We are in the midst of a cost of living crisis. At the same time, energy giants are posting record profits. Shell, £14 billion profit this year. BP, £9.5 billion profit this year. Combine that over £44,000 a minute. At the same time, household energy bills are going up by almost £700. We need a windfall tax on energy companies with the money going into people's pockets. It is unbelievable that the SNP and Tory MPs refuse to back it, but they are also failing in this Parliament. The SNP Government has known that this crisis is coming, but despite months of pleading for action, why are people still waiting for help? First Minister, this is quite an incredible line of questioning by Anas Sarwar. It is a serious line of questioning, and I will come on to the very serious point about the cost of living crisis in a second. He asked me about a windfall levy on oil and gas companies last week. I made clear that I have no objection to that. I said again yesterday that I think that companies seeing rising profits should make more of a contribution, and it is for the UK Government to come forward with proposals on that. He is asking me about something that regrettably I have no power to do. Perhaps, rather than Anas Sarwar asking me about things that I lack the power to do, he should join me in seeking those powers for this Parliament, so that we can actually do those things, as opposed to just talk about them. It is not the case that this Government has not been taking action. We have taken a range of measures to help people in poverty. Of course, we have set up the child payment. We have recently announced plans to double the child payment. We have taken action to help people with the cost of winter and rising fuel costs already. Of course, in spite of believing, as we do at the moment, although that is still to be finalised, that the announcements from the Chancellor last week will not deliver any net increase to what we were already expecting to have in the Scottish Government budget. The finance secretary will set out further plans this afternoon to help those who are struggling with the rising costs of energy. We will continue to do everything that we can to help, but looking to the future, would it not be better if more of those powers lay in the hands of the Government in this Parliament, rather than then being left at Westminster in the hands of Conservative Governments? Anas Sarwar. Forgive me for praying, but this is classic SMP. We say one thing, do another. Your MPs had a chance last week to vote for a windfall tax and failed to do so. I did ask the First Minister about what this Government plans to do, because while the First Minister scrambles to put together a last-minute plan, we set out proposals months ago, which could have been helping people right now. In response to the deepening crisis, we have published plans to support hard-pressed Scots. That includes a UK windfall tax that provides most households with £200 off their bills, and a further £815,000 household in Scotland, £600 off their bills. The First Minister says that she will set out plans for Scotland this afternoon. We have already set out detailed plans that would help over half a million of the hardest-hit Scots. £400 to people who receive council tax reduction, pension credit, child winter heating assistance, or care-ins allowance supplement, and a top-up to Scottish welfare fund, giving councils the ability to award £400 to those not covered by the scheme, but also struggling to pay their bills. Will the First Minister support those plans? The finance secretary will set out additional plans this afternoon. Of course, we will look carefully at any proposals that come from Labour or anybody else, but like most of Labour's proposals, they lack any indication of how the plan should be paid for. The Scottish Government has actually got to fund the things that we do. In terms of what we have already done, so we have already taken significant action. For example, we have provided pandemic support payments to more than half a million households. We have delivered the Scottish child payment, we have delivered bridging payments to those for older children, we have continued an increased funding for discretionary housing payments, which of course is how we also mitigate against the Tory bedroom tax, which would not even be there if we had more powers in the hands of this Parliament. We have delivered our £41 million winter support fund to help people heat their homes and meet the rising costs of food. We have continued investment in the Scottish welfare fund, we are supporting debt and welfare advice services. We are taking a range of actions on the back of the chancellor's announcements last week. We assumed that there would be additional money coming to the Scottish Government. It now does not look as if that will be a net increase, but not withstanding that we have committed and we stand by the commitment to deliver an additional £290 million worth of support, which would have been the equivalent of the consequentials had they been passed on to us. The finance secretary will set out the detail of that this afternoon, where she will balance helping as many people as possible with getting the support to people as quickly as possible. We will continue to do everything that is within our power and our financial resources to help people. We have published a fully-costed plan that goes alongside the £290 million figure that the First Minister has just quoted. We knew that this problem was coming, and the Government has just set a £44 billion budget. Why was that not a priority when we knew that we were in the midst of a cost of living crisis? We are in the midst of a cost of living crisis, and Scots are being failed by two Governments who just do not get it. The Tories cut universal credit, put up national insurance and write off billions in fraud. The SNP increased water charges, increased rail fares while taxing people to park their work and squandered hundreds of millions of public money due to incompetence and mismanagement. Both failed to back a windfall tax on energy companies who are raking in billions while bills go up for millions. We have known about this crisis for months, but both Governments have failed to support people struggling across the country. First Minister, your answers just aren't good enough. If you really want to help family budgets, will you reverse your decisions to increase rail fares and water charges and back Labour's plan? Both rail fares and water charges on average are lower in Scotland than they are elsewhere in the UK, but can we go back to the point about votes in budgets and the use of our budget? It is only a few weeks, of course, since we had the stage 1 vote on next year's budget in this Parliament. That was a budget that included plans and included the money to double the Scottish child payment, game changing in helping lift children out of poverty. Scottish Labour voted against the budget that doubled the Scottish child payment. It will be interesting to see this afternoon whether Labour voted further against the budget at its final stage, but if they voted against it or failed to support it, they will vote against the doubling of the child payment. Anna Sarwar is saying to me that that is not how it works. I am afraid that it is how it works. If you want money for a child payment to lift people out of poverty, you have to vote for it in the budget. It is exactly how it works. We will do everything. The support for people in poverty in Scotland exceeds that in other parts of the UK, including in many respects in Wales, where Labour is in government. We do everything within our powers, everything within our resources to help, and that will continue. However, Labour will lack credibility on that issue for as long as it team up with the Tories to keep those vital powers over benefits, over energy in the hands of Conservatives at Westminster instead of arguing for those powers to lie here, where we can use them to do more to help the most vulnerable in our society. We will now move to supplementaries, and I call Christine Graham. Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. First Minister, what is your response to the actions of Kurt Zuma, the Premier League footballer for West Ham, who tormented one of his cats for fun, with a video of his actions posted on social media by the entertainment of others? Can she advise the chamber whether she considers the laws and animal welfare here are sufficiently robust to deal with such horrific actions should they occur here? First Minister. Well, this incident, certainly what I know about it, which is the same, I'm sure, as what everybody else knows about it, was absolutely appalling and sickening. But in terms of the question about Scotland, we have one of the most robust animal welfare frameworks anywhere in the world, actually, and we continue to strengthen and develop the measures in place to protect animals and enable effective enforcement action. So the Animal Health and Welfare Act 2006 would provide and does provide sufficient powers to take enforcement action in a case like this and, indeed, to remove animals away from abusive keepers. Graham Simpson. Thank you. The latest bombshell from Ferguson Marine is that cables on one of the ferries that they're allegedly building are too short and will have to be replaced. The First Minister will be familiar with the ferry because it's the one that she launched in 2017. Can she say how much extra this will cost and what the delay will be? First Minister, this is an issue around cabling that was installed by FML contractors in late 2018 and early 2019. Prior to the shipyard coming into public ownership, the Government and the Finance Secretary will be working closely with the yard to ensure that this is rectified as quickly as possible and as cost-effectively as possible, and she will, of course, keep Parliament fully updated. Pam Duncan-Glancy. Thank you, Presiding Officer. The First Minister will be aware of the situation with Trinity Towers in the Glasgow area and may know that 100 households in my region have been evacuated as a result of risk of this dangerous structure. Despite being advised that the evacuation could last two to three months, my constituents are being told by insurers that because no damage has been done to their homes, no alternative accommodation has been provided. In June 2018, following the Glasgow School of Art Fire, the Government made £1,500 of emergency funding available for households displaced and it was matched by Glasgow City Council. Can the First Minister, my constituents are anxious and distressed about being removed from their homes and possessions? Will the Government take action to ensure that similar support is now provided to them? First Minister, this is an incredibly difficult situation for residents of Trinity Towers and, indeed, residents in surrounding buildings who have all been evacuated from their homes and remain out of their homes. I know that the constituency MSP and, indeed, Alison Thewlis, the constituency MP have been very involved. I will continue to be very involved in supporting their constituents. We will, of course, liaise with and continue to liaise with Glasgow City Council and offer any reasonable support that we can to help to rectify the situation and get people back into their houses as soon as possible. To ask the First Minister how the Scottish Government is marking LGBT history month. The Scottish Government has a very strong commitment to advancing LGBTI equality, inclusion and rights. We work closely with national LGBTI organisations to protect, promote and improve equality. We also show support for key events such as LGBT Youth Scotland's annual fundraising day, Purple Friday. We recognise that many people feel under or misrepresented in history, so LGBT history month provides an opportunity to reinforce the sense of belonging, value and respect that everyone has a right to feel. It is also a time to reflect on what more we need to do as a society to ensure that Scotland is truly equal and inclusive and a place where everyone feels safe and valued for who they are. LGBT history month gives us an opportunity to celebrate Scotland's diversity and reflect on historic injustice and persecution. Let's be clear, Scotland is an inclusive nation and our commitment to human rights must not waver. That's why it's so shocking for many that bigotry and damaging practices such as conversion therapy still happen in this country. This week, it was revealed that crimes against LGBT people have accounted for more than a third of all hate crimes reported to transport police in the nine months to January this year. Will the First Minister stand with the LGBT community and condemn these acts of hate crime and outline what more she and her Government can do to tackle anti-LGBT discrimination in Scotland? I agree very strongly with the sentiments and, indeed, the substance of that question. I condemn all forms of hate crime, prejudice and discrimination. We should never be complacent and we should never assume—this is an important lesson for Scotland in many countries right now at this moment in history—that progress is not reversible. We have to fight for progress each and every single day. I'm sure that everyone in the chamber stands shoulder to shoulder with the LGBTI community and, indeed, condemn any and all hate crime later this year. The Scottish Government will work with partners to publish a new hate crime strategy to guide how we tackle hatred and prejudice, including when it is directed towards LGBTI community. We'll also work with the Parliament's Equalities Committee to introduce legislation that is as comprehensive as possible within our devolved powers to ban conversion practices by the end of next year. Those are harmful discriminatory practices, which have no place whatsoever in our society. I associate myself with the comments of Gillian Mackay and, indeed, the First Minister as we celebrate LGBT history month. Access to sport for LGBTI plus people has been historically challenging and remains so today due to barriers of stigma and discrimination. Although we have made progress on sporting role models globally, we still have a long way to go, with many professional footballers in this country speaking of the barriers that remain to players coming out. Would the First Minister agree with me that the work of organisations such as Leap Sports and campaigns such as Stonewall's Rainbow Laces are vital in supporting LGBT plus people to participate in and enjoy watching sport? What more will the Government do to support this important work? Can I absolutely take the opportunity to support the organisation and campaigns that he has cited? I think that they are really important. There is continuing stigma in our society and in sport, and perhaps in some sports in particular that stigma remains particularly strong. All sports people should be encouraged to be themselves and to be open about them being themselves. When they do, it is incumbent on all of us to make sure that we show them full support for that and to stand shoulder to shoulder against any discrimination and stigma. We will continue to work with a range of organisations to look at what more the Scottish Government can do to support this. It is something that I know many of us, and I certainly include myself strongly in this, feel very passionately about that is still work to do, and the Scottish Government is fully committed to playing our full part. To ask the First Minister what discussions the Scottish Government has had with professional footballing authorities regarding the protection of women and girls within football. Violence and abuse against women and girls is abhorrent and unacceptable. Football, of course, has a very special place in our society, and that is why it is so vital that football authorities and clubs ensure that they and their players are positive role models for both children and adults across the country. Scottish Government officials have recently discussed those issues with the Scottish FFA, which have advised that they have safeguarding policies and guidance in place for players and coaches. Of course, Scottish women's football also has comprehensive policies in place. The Sports Minister will be meeting with the football authorities in the near future to discuss what further steps they could take to support women and girls within the sport more generally. Now that Wraith Rovers has withdrawn their offer to David Goodwilly, the immediate media storm has died down, but an issue remains within the footballing environment where two clubs felt it appropriate to offer a job to a proven rapist despite no apology or contrition. Furthermore, claims have been made that no payment was ever made to the victim, Denise Claire. Firstly, given the leadership role that footballers have in our society, does the FFM support the concept that is floated by Val McDermott of an independent regulator that could, for example, undertake a fit and proper person test for footballers? Secondly, what steps can be taken by the Scottish Government to support a change in the misogynistic culture of football where scoring goals is awarded a higher priority than the safety of women? First, I think that Val McDermott's proposal merits further consideration in the interest of full transparency. Val McDermott is a friend of mine, but notwithstanding that, I think that she has said many sensible things on this issue. Football clubs have a particular responsibility that reflects their special place within our society. Being a footballer, for different reasons obviously, but I suppose a bit like being a politician, it is not an ordinary job. People look up to footballers, that is perhaps not always true of politicians, but there is a responsibility on football clubs to make sure that those playing for them are role models for the wee boys and the wee girls who do look up to them and see them as heroes, and that is an important responsibility. I think that the football authorities perhaps need to reflect on recent events and ask the question about whether current rules and regulations are sufficient. Of course, there is a deeper culture within our society and that is reflected in football. We need to tackle misogyny. Of course, we have Helena Kennedy right now looking at this issue for the Scottish Government due to report relatively soon, and we will reflect carefully on all of that. That is a more general response, but it obviously has particular questions for football. I would say one thing. There has been comment made, including about my comments, that, when this particular player signed for Clyde, the same outrage was not expressed. It is the case that I think that there are things that went uncommented upon perhaps in past years that are now called out. That is progress, and it shows us that there is less of a tolerance for misogyny, less of a tolerance for violence against women, but it is not yet zero tolerance, and it is zero tolerance that we have a responsibility to achieve. To ask the First Minister what action the Scottish Government is taking to restore Peatland as part of its net zero targets. Since 2012, we have funded the restoration of 30,000 hectares of degraded peat. We are committed to significantly increasing that to help meet net zero targets. In 2020, we announced that a record funding package of £250 million to support the restoration of 250,000 hectares of degraded peatland by 2030. That commitment is helping to grow this new industry. It is supporting a pipeline of multi-year landscape scale restoration projects. It is boosting the confidence of contractors to invest in the people's skills and machinery needed to get this job done. It is attracting private finance into the sector and by supporting green jobs in communities across rural Scotland, it is helping our just transition to net zero. I thank the First Minister for this answer, but we know that her Government's desktop approach to rural areas is failing. Peatland targets for the past four years missed. Emission targets for five key sectors missed. Since 1994, 50% of Scotland's iconic species vanished. Lord Debonne says that the credibility of the Scottish climate framework is in jeopardy. First Minister, when will your SNP-green coalition take climate change seriously and produce a robust, moreland strategy to save Scotland's iconic species and protect biodiversity from rural jobs and livelihoods? Ms Hamilton, I could not hear your question. I am not convinced that the First Minister would have been able to hear your question. Would you be good enough to repeat the end of your question, at least thank you? First Minister, when will your SNP-green coalition take climate change seriously and produce a robust, moreland strategy to save Scotland's iconic species and protect biodiversity from rural jobs and livelihoods? I should beg her's belief that a Tory MSP is getting up talking about taking climate change seriously. Clearly, she did not listen to the questioning of her leader at an earlier stage. The approach of the Conservatives, of course, is to say that we should take climate change seriously, but then opportunistically oppose every measure that we take to tackle climate change when it suits them to do so. We saw that very clearly earlier on today. The Government's record on peatland restoration is a good one. I have already spoken about the restoration of 30,000 hectares, the record funding package and all that that is enabling. We will continue to get on with taking the actions to tackle climate change, and perhaps it is the Conservatives who need to learn to take it a bit more seriously. Can the First Minister outline what funding has been made available to the 45 hectares of peatlands at Langlands Moss, and does she agree with me that the work undertaken by the Friends of Langlands Moss has been a huge factor in promoting the local environment and improving people's health? In 2019-20, the Scottish Government-funded peatland restoration programme funded work at Langlands Moss to the value of £63,800. I would certainly agree that the Friends of Langlands Moss is an excellent example of the type of partnership that is needed to allow communities to make decisions about management of their local environment and help to address the twin climate and biodiversity crisis. To ask the First Minister what action the Scottish Government is taking to reduce delayed discharge from hospitals in light of reports that it is at the highest recorded level since the Covid-19 pandemic began. The Scottish Government is committed to reducing the number of people delayed in hospital. In October, the health secretary announced an investment of £300 million to help address winter pressures. That included £40 million to support alternative interim care arrangements and £62 million to enhance care at home. Part of the funding is being used to rapidly scale up hospital at home services to, first and foremost, provide better care but also to help to alleviate pressures on acute services. There have been significant recent developments with new services launched in Ayrshire and Arran and Greater Glasgow and Clyde. We have also recently launched the Discharge Without Delay programme, backed by £5 million, to help local health and social care partnerships to improve discharge planning arrangements over the longer term. I thank the First Minister for her response. We know that, by ending delayed discharge, it frees up bed capacity in hospitals, has a positive effect on A and E waiting times and it even has a positive effect on ambulances queuing at the front door. The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport is quite right to set out his plan to help the NHS through the anticipated winter crisis. Given the record high levels of delayed discharge, does the First Minister believe that her cabinet secretary's strategy has worked and why is it that, seven years on from the SNP, promising to end delayed discharge completely, are there more than 1,600 people unnecessarily stuck in hospital? Yes, I do believe the actions that we are taking are the right ones but we are not complacent and we will continue to take whatever steps we can to address this. In fact, the health secretary and I and senior officials have a session just this afternoon to look at progress on this and what further steps we need to take. It is worth noting that the average bed days occupied by delay for 2020-21 represent a reduction on the previous year, a reduction of 34 per cent, but it is still too high. This is a whole system challenge and it is one that we are very focused on addressing. It takes steps across the whole of the health and care system and, of course, the work to establish a national care service in the longer term is important in this context as well. To ask the First Minister whether she will provide an update on what steps the Scottish Government is taking to improve CAMHS waiting times. We know that the pandemic has been exceptionally difficult for the mental health and wellbeing of many children, young people and families. We have allocated almost £40 million additional funding in 2021-22 to NHS boards to improve CAMHS. That comes from our overall recovery and renewal fund. More than £4 million of that allocation is directly focused on offering treatment to those already on CAMHS waiting lists to tackle the longest waits. We are working closely with all NHS boards, particularly those with the most significant challenges to develop and implement detailed local improvement plans to clear backlogs and meet targets. The Royal College of Psychiatrists this week have called on the Scottish Government to quote, pull out all the stops and explain how it will meet its target for investing in mental health services for our children and young people. I was contacted by a teacher who is more than happy to meet the First Minister, and that teacher said, could you ask her, can she rescind the free bus travel, stop giving out laptops and put some money into mental health provision for our young people? What good is a laptop and a free bus pass when you're in a deep state of anxiety and depression? Will the First Minister agree to meet with this teacher to find out what CAMHS delays feel like for those who are left to support our young people through this waiting period? First, of course I or the Health Secretary will be happy to speak to the teacher quoted or indeed any professional working with young people. This is a really serious issue. I'm not entirely sure if the member is seriously asking me or just quoting somebody else asking me to rescind free bus travel. I think that would be the wrong thing to do for the broader wellbeing of our young people, so perhaps that's something the member could clarify at some stage in the future. In terms of the action that we are taking, the NHS recovery plan commits to provide extra funding for more than 300 additional staff in CAMHS over the coming years. That has the potential to increase capacity to see cases by over 10,000. Long waits are always unacceptable, but it's important to stress that long waits are not the norm. The median wait nationally for a first treatment appointment in CAMHS was seven weeks, and of course almost eight out of ten young people, which is not good enough, but eight out of ten right now of children and young people are seen within the target we set. The final point I would make, Presiding Officer, is that while the investment I'm speaking about to tackle longer waits is really important, there is a bigger challenge here, which is to redesign and reform CAMHS services so that there is more preventative treatment, that there is more early intervention. That's why councillors and schools are so important, the approach to a national wellbeing service and, indeed, policies like free bus travel, which supports the overall wellbeing of young people. This is something that we need to address on all of these fronts, and this Government is doing exactly that. I acknowledge that today's announcement on face masks in schools was made on the basis of clinical advice, but for many clinically vulnerable staff and pupils in our schools, that will only increase their anxiety. Can I ask the First Minister to confirm that no school or council should seek to prevent any pupil or member of staff who wishes to wear a face covering from continuing to do so? Yes, I think that this is a really important point, so I'm grateful to Ross Greer for giving me the opportunity to underline it. The requirement to wear face coverings in classrooms will be removed from the end of February, but any young person or indeed any member of staff who feels safer and would prefer to continue to wear a face covering should absolutely be fully supported in doing so. In all of the decisions that we are taking right now, it is important that we balance that understandable and perfectly legitimate desire to get back to normal with understanding that those who are more clinically vulnerable do have a real sense of anxiety and we need to consider their needs and concerns as well. That's a really important point, and I'm glad to have the opportunity to underline and emphasise it. Over 200 nurseries wrote to the First Minister this week to raise concerns relating to the roll-out of 1140 hours and the funding and equity between private and voluntary industry and local authority nurseries. Private nurseries have warned that these are serious flaws in the delivery of 1140 hours, and if they are not addressed, many will have to reduce opening hours or close completely. Can I therefore ask if the First Minister will respond immediately to the concerns contained within the letter and if the Scottish Government will commit to an audit on early learning and childcare funding, comparing best value between all sectors? Of course we will respond and indeed listen carefully to the views expressed in that communication, but I'm really proud of the fact that since last August all councils have been offering 1140 hours of funded early learning and childcare to all eligible children and that the private, third and child-mining sectors are playing a vital role in the delivery of that and the increasing choice and flexibility for parents. I want to thank everybody across the sector for that. We are investing more than a billion pounds in early learning and childcare in this financial year and it's important to stress that the funding agreement between the Scottish Government and COSLA enables local authorities to pay sustainable rates to private nurseries who provide free early learning and childcare places and to child-minders. That's an important principle, but of course we will pay close attention to the points made in the letter and respond as quickly as possible.