 As usual, I was on the day that Jan and C, I think maybe, you'd like this back, would you? That's fine. I want to miss you, Freda. I don't want to miss you. Thank you. Well, thank you. My pleasure. And good luck. Well, thank you. Good luck to you. All right. And it's a little souvenir, so don't forget us. Thank you. I promise I'll never forget you. Thank you very much. I think I could do to help just let you know. Okay. It's a blessing. Take care. I couldn't I went. Go. Okay. That's a promise. Stay strong. Toe marks. Tongues. Yes. negotiating. She can squeeze it. a magic. Squeeze it a little bit. Squeeze it. Look at me. I'll make a few. Ten cranes. And then we can... I just wanted to make sure that everyone has their eyes open and is looking at me. He was just sitting rigid. Fascinating. When I was over I found out why. He was counting the jet on his camera. It's smoke. It's smoke. It's smoke. Okay, sir. Yes, sir. Well, listen, welcome everybody. And let's get going because we've got a few things to talk about. I first wanted to take a little bit here to report on the meetings that we had. That my meeting with King was the same. It was a good meeting and I had to say that all the setbacks and everything was shown. Great deal of courage and it's still in there. I'm just trying to get into outright face-to-face negotiations. Reasons, episodes of violence just emphasize not just to draw back the great urgency needed to go forward. This courage and leadership haven't been about major risks, of course. And that area is under constant, not even any pressure from all of those who are opposed to a peaceful settlement and meet their legitimate defense needs. Wish them to become much more evident because of his willingness to take the example. Is that I propose that we settle the passive arms to him and I hope that you'll recognize that he has put himself at rest and there's other evidence that this is definitely needed. So I'd like to ask for your support so that we can continue to have direct negotiations and adjustments to last in peace. And without them, we'd need the greatest contribution to Israel and me. Then more secure as one as ourselves. But now last week we also had productive meetings with Soviet Foreign Minister Shevronovic in which we outlined our approaches on U.S.-Soviet issues including human rights, regional issues, bilateral matters, and of course security and arms control. Now when I say we have productive meetings, we recognize that the meeting was only kind of discussing the agenda of this morning meeting in November. But I'm quite convinced that Mr. Shevronovic has had to go back to Moscow with the news that we're for real with regard to disarmament and there's many games that we're playing. And I think also that after our conversation he's going back to give you reports honestly, which I'm sure he will do, is that we need to, not only on that, but they've got any hopes that we're going to be able to run the past over that never looks cosmetically proper known because we made a very plain to him that the United States is not seeking superiority in military strength, but we're not going to let anyone else have sufficient military superiority to ever be able to threaten us, to be able to deliver an ultimatum on a surrender on a basis. We're going to do whatever it takes to see that we're able to defend our systems. I think we will not have that in mind. We reaffirmed our strong interest, as I said, however, with regard to defense and encouraging them to see defensive things for a mix of offense and defense that could lead to what both of us have expressed and that is a desire to get rid of military weapons entirely. He brought to me a letter from Borisov, a new fellow that was written in Russian. So I found it out to be delivered back and basically what it did was talk about the proposal that finally has been presented at Geneva. This is the first time that I can recall that they had ever come forth with an actual number and said that they were willing to talk about a number of weapons that they would reduce. We've had such a proposal around the table that everyone's going to negotiate to start. And all they've done is said they would make speeches and never come back because you wouldn't normally go to the police and say, well, we can't buy your figure but here's our figure and then you sell it to us and it's the contribution you get to each other. That's never taken place. I should assume that it will now that there's two sets of numbers on the table. It's clear that western unity and firm have struck that negotiating table after they walked out in 1983 for over a year and after a lot of posturing about moratoriums and freezes and so forth, as I say, proposing reductions. I don't want to get into the details of the Soviet proposal in the barred issue of the section that belongs at the table between the negotiators now out in public, except for one thing the Soviets are still laying out and not everything you read about it in the papers is quite accurate. So now I'm going to ask the money field a few words to say it myself about the situation in this meeting. Brother.