 Great. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Appreciate it. And Ms. Tannen, again, thank you for taking time to speak with me last week. And we had the opportunity to go over a number of different issues, including a bunch of policy issues. Let me focus today at the outset on the issue that many of my Republican colleagues have raised with me. As we've discussed, OMB Director has to be able to work with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle. This is true with Cabinet officials generally, but specifically with OMB because you have so many interactions with them both on the budget and on the oversight responsibilities. And typically the OMB Director is not a partisan in particular because you have to have these kinds of relationships. I believe that the tone, the content, and the aggressive partisanship of some of your public statements have added to the troubling trend of more incivility and division in our public life. And in your case, I'm concerned that your personal attacks about specific senators will make it more difficult for you to work with them. Just to mention a few of the thousands of negative public statements, you wrote that Susan Collins is, quote, the worst. Tom Cotton is a fraud that vampires have more heart than Ted Cruz. You called Leader McConnell, Moscow Mitch, and Voldemort, and on and on. I wonder specifically, how do you plan to amend fences and build relationships with members of Congress who have attacked through your public statements? Senator, I very much appreciate that question. I recognize the concern. I deeply regret and apologize for my language and some of my past language. I recognize that this role is a bipartisan role, and I know I have to earn the trust of senators across the board. I will work very aggressively to meet that concern. I know the last four years or the last few years have been pretty polarizing, and I hope that we can work to address the country's challenges in a bipartisan and nonpartisan manner. I appreciate that it's upon me to prove that to this committee and to members, and I will work as hard to address the concerns of Republican senators as Democratic senators and will be accountable. I want the OMB to be accountable to Congress and work effectively with you. There are media reports that during November of 2020 after the election, so late last year, more than a thousand tweets were deleted from your account. Some of these public statements have been tweets. Are these media reports that you deleted more than a thousand tweets in November in advance of your nomination accurate? And if so, why did you delete them? Senator, I appreciate people's concerns about my tweets, and I've regretted them. I deleted tweets because I regretted my tone, and I've deleted tweets over many months. For those concerned about my rhetoric and my language, I'm sorry, and I'm sorry for any hurt that they've caused. So you did delete the tweets. Did you delete them because you believe you might be nominated for this job or another job? I deleted tweets over many months because I regretted the tone of my tweets. Okay, but specifically after the election, you deleted a thousand tweets according to media reports. I take it from what you're saying today that's accurate. Is that true? I don't actually know, but I completely conceded the point. Okay, and I guess that the question is, you know, is that the right thing to do to go back and try to cover what you had said, given that you might be in a different position, which would be a nomination for a cabinet level job? With the removal of more than a thousand tweets, there's still a lot of harsh partisan tweets on your account. I found through my staff, there are still nine pages of tweets about Senator Ted Cruz, for example. How did you choose which tweets you wanted to delete and which ones you wanted to keep on your account? Senator, I mean, I just thought of some of my language and deleted my tweets. But I would also just say again that to the extent people are hurt by my language, I deeply apologize.